Cargando…
ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Selective outcome reporting and publication bias threaten the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and can affect clinical decision-making. A rigorous method to evaluate the impact of this bias on the results of network meta-analyses of interventions is lacking. We present a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02166-3 |
_version_ | 1784602975844433920 |
---|---|
author | Chiocchia, Virginia Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Higgins, Julian P. T. Page, Matthew J. Papakonstantinou, Theodoros Cipriani, Andrea Furukawa, Toshi A. Siontis, George C. M. Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia |
author_facet | Chiocchia, Virginia Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Higgins, Julian P. T. Page, Matthew J. Papakonstantinou, Theodoros Cipriani, Andrea Furukawa, Toshi A. Siontis, George C. M. Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia |
author_sort | Chiocchia, Virginia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Selective outcome reporting and publication bias threaten the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and can affect clinical decision-making. A rigorous method to evaluate the impact of this bias on the results of network meta-analyses of interventions is lacking. We present a tool to assess the Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN). METHODS: ROB-MEN first evaluates the risk of bias due to missing evidence for each of the possible pairwise comparison that can be made between the interventions in the network. This step considers possible bias due to the presence of studies with unavailable results (within-study assessment of bias) and the potential for unpublished studies (across-study assessment of bias). The second step combines the judgements about the risk of bias due to missing evidence in pairwise comparisons with (i) the contribution of direct comparisons to the network meta-analysis estimates, (ii) possible small-study effects evaluated by network meta-regression, and (iii) any bias from unobserved comparisons. Then, a level of “low risk”, “some concerns”, or “high risk” for the bias due to missing evidence is assigned to each estimate, which is our tool’s final output. RESULTS: We describe the methodology of ROB-MEN step-by-step using an illustrative example from a published NMA of non-diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with low risk acute coronary syndrome. We also report a full application of the tool on a larger and more complex published network of 18 drugs from head-to-head studies for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: ROB-MEN is the first tool for evaluating the risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis and applies to networks of all sizes and geometry. The use of ROB-MEN is facilitated by an R Shiny web application that produces the Pairwise Comparisons and ROB-MEN Table and is incorporated in the reporting bias domain of the CINeMA framework and software. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02166-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8609747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86097472021-11-23 ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis Chiocchia, Virginia Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Higgins, Julian P. T. Page, Matthew J. Papakonstantinou, Theodoros Cipriani, Andrea Furukawa, Toshi A. Siontis, George C. M. Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia BMC Med Guideline BACKGROUND: Selective outcome reporting and publication bias threaten the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and can affect clinical decision-making. A rigorous method to evaluate the impact of this bias on the results of network meta-analyses of interventions is lacking. We present a tool to assess the Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN). METHODS: ROB-MEN first evaluates the risk of bias due to missing evidence for each of the possible pairwise comparison that can be made between the interventions in the network. This step considers possible bias due to the presence of studies with unavailable results (within-study assessment of bias) and the potential for unpublished studies (across-study assessment of bias). The second step combines the judgements about the risk of bias due to missing evidence in pairwise comparisons with (i) the contribution of direct comparisons to the network meta-analysis estimates, (ii) possible small-study effects evaluated by network meta-regression, and (iii) any bias from unobserved comparisons. Then, a level of “low risk”, “some concerns”, or “high risk” for the bias due to missing evidence is assigned to each estimate, which is our tool’s final output. RESULTS: We describe the methodology of ROB-MEN step-by-step using an illustrative example from a published NMA of non-diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with low risk acute coronary syndrome. We also report a full application of the tool on a larger and more complex published network of 18 drugs from head-to-head studies for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: ROB-MEN is the first tool for evaluating the risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis and applies to networks of all sizes and geometry. The use of ROB-MEN is facilitated by an R Shiny web application that produces the Pairwise Comparisons and ROB-MEN Table and is incorporated in the reporting bias domain of the CINeMA framework and software. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02166-3. BioMed Central 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8609747/ /pubmed/34809639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02166-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Guideline Chiocchia, Virginia Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Higgins, Julian P. T. Page, Matthew J. Papakonstantinou, Theodoros Cipriani, Andrea Furukawa, Toshi A. Siontis, George C. M. Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
title | ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
title_full | ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
title_short | ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
title_sort | rob-men: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis |
topic | Guideline |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34809639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02166-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiocchiavirginia robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT nikolakopoulouadriani robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT higginsjulianpt robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT pagematthewj robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT papakonstantinoutheodoros robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT ciprianiandrea robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT furukawatoshia robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT siontisgeorgecm robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT eggermatthias robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis AT salantigeorgia robmenatooltoassessriskofbiasduetomissingevidenceinnetworkmetaanalysis |