Cargando…

Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of myocardial bridge (MB) has been defined in different femoral access conventional coronary angiography (FACCA) studies, the frequency of MB on radial access coronary angiography (RACA) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in the incid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şenöz, Oktay, Yapan Emren, Zeynep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34814842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02382-y
_version_ 1784602978902081536
author Şenöz, Oktay
Yapan Emren, Zeynep
author_facet Şenöz, Oktay
Yapan Emren, Zeynep
author_sort Şenöz, Oktay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of myocardial bridge (MB) has been defined in different femoral access conventional coronary angiography (FACCA) studies, the frequency of MB on radial access coronary angiography (RACA) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in the incidence of MB between patients undergoing RACA and FACCA. METHOD: A total of 2500 consecutive patients who underwent RACA and a total of 1455 consecutive patients who underwent FACCA were retrospectively investigated to detect the presence of MB. The incidences of the groups were calculated separately and compared. The clinical and angiographic features of the patients with MB were analyzed. RESULTS: MB was detected at an incidence of 10.2%, in 255/2500 patients who underwent RACA, and 1.8% in 27/1455 patients who underwent FACCA (p < 0.001). In both RACA and FACCA patients, the most involved coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (86.9% and 93.1%) and the mid-segment (84.9% and 88.9%) was the most affected section. Co-involvement of multiple coronary arteries by MB was 7.8% in patients who underwent RACA and 7.4% in patients who underwent FACCA. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined in 111 (35.7%) of the coronary arteries with MB, of which 81.9% were proximal to the MB. No significant CAD was detected in any of the vessels of 69.8% (178/255) of the patients who underwent RACA for different clinical indications. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated that the incidence of myocardial bridge able to be detected on RACA was much higher than FACCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8609761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86097612021-11-23 Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography? Şenöz, Oktay Yapan Emren, Zeynep BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of myocardial bridge (MB) has been defined in different femoral access conventional coronary angiography (FACCA) studies, the frequency of MB on radial access coronary angiography (RACA) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in the incidence of MB between patients undergoing RACA and FACCA. METHOD: A total of 2500 consecutive patients who underwent RACA and a total of 1455 consecutive patients who underwent FACCA were retrospectively investigated to detect the presence of MB. The incidences of the groups were calculated separately and compared. The clinical and angiographic features of the patients with MB were analyzed. RESULTS: MB was detected at an incidence of 10.2%, in 255/2500 patients who underwent RACA, and 1.8% in 27/1455 patients who underwent FACCA (p < 0.001). In both RACA and FACCA patients, the most involved coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (86.9% and 93.1%) and the mid-segment (84.9% and 88.9%) was the most affected section. Co-involvement of multiple coronary arteries by MB was 7.8% in patients who underwent RACA and 7.4% in patients who underwent FACCA. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined in 111 (35.7%) of the coronary arteries with MB, of which 81.9% were proximal to the MB. No significant CAD was detected in any of the vessels of 69.8% (178/255) of the patients who underwent RACA for different clinical indications. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated that the incidence of myocardial bridge able to be detected on RACA was much higher than FACCA. BioMed Central 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8609761/ /pubmed/34814842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02382-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Şenöz, Oktay
Yapan Emren, Zeynep
Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_full Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_fullStr Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_full_unstemmed Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_short Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_sort is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34814842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02382-y
work_keys_str_mv AT senozoktay ismyocardialbridgemorefrequentlydetectedonradialaccesscoronaryangiography
AT yapanemrenzeynep ismyocardialbridgemorefrequentlydetectedonradialaccesscoronaryangiography