Cargando…

Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

OBJECTIVES: To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosch, Philipp, Carubbi, Francesco, Scirè, Carlo Alberto, Baraliakos, Xenofon, Falzon, Louise, Dejaco, Christian, Machado, Pedro M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34810228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001864
_version_ 1784603014205538304
author Bosch, Philipp
Carubbi, Francesco
Scirè, Carlo Alberto
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Falzon, Louise
Dejaco, Christian
Machado, Pedro M
author_facet Bosch, Philipp
Carubbi, Francesco
Scirè, Carlo Alberto
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Falzon, Louise
Dejaco, Christian
Machado, Pedro M
author_sort Bosch, Philipp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve prospective and retrospective studies published in English and comparing different (imaging) techniques, different settings and procedural protocols to guide interventions in patients with RMDs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases were searched through October 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool for randomised trials V.2 (ROB2), the RoB tool for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions and the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: Sixty-six studies were included (most with moderate/high RoB); 49 were randomised controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies and 14 retrospective studies. Fifty-one studies compared either one imaging technique with another imaging technique, or with palpation-guided interventions. Ultrasound (US) was most frequently studied (49/51), followed by fluoroscopy (10/51). Higher accuracy was found for US or fluoroscopy compared with palpation-guided interventions. Studies comparing different imaging techniques (12/51) did not endorse one specific method. Different settings/equipment for imaging-guided procedures (eg, automatic vs manual syringes) were investigated in three studies, reporting heterogeneous results. Fifteen studies compared different imaging-guided procedures (eg, intra-articular vs periarticular injections). CONCLUSION: Higher accuracy of needle positioning at joints and periarticular structures was seen in most studies when using imaging (especially US) guidance as compared with palpation-guided interventions with the limitation of heterogeneity of data and considerable RoB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8609947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86099472021-12-10 Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider Bosch, Philipp Carubbi, Francesco Scirè, Carlo Alberto Baraliakos, Xenofon Falzon, Louise Dejaco, Christian Machado, Pedro M RMD Open Imaging OBJECTIVES: To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve prospective and retrospective studies published in English and comparing different (imaging) techniques, different settings and procedural protocols to guide interventions in patients with RMDs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases were searched through October 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool for randomised trials V.2 (ROB2), the RoB tool for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions and the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: Sixty-six studies were included (most with moderate/high RoB); 49 were randomised controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies and 14 retrospective studies. Fifty-one studies compared either one imaging technique with another imaging technique, or with palpation-guided interventions. Ultrasound (US) was most frequently studied (49/51), followed by fluoroscopy (10/51). Higher accuracy was found for US or fluoroscopy compared with palpation-guided interventions. Studies comparing different imaging techniques (12/51) did not endorse one specific method. Different settings/equipment for imaging-guided procedures (eg, automatic vs manual syringes) were investigated in three studies, reporting heterogeneous results. Fifteen studies compared different imaging-guided procedures (eg, intra-articular vs periarticular injections). CONCLUSION: Higher accuracy of needle positioning at joints and periarticular structures was seen in most studies when using imaging (especially US) guidance as compared with palpation-guided interventions with the limitation of heterogeneity of data and considerable RoB. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8609947/ /pubmed/34810228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001864 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Imaging
Bosch, Philipp
Carubbi, Francesco
Scirè, Carlo Alberto
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Falzon, Louise
Dejaco, Christian
Machado, Pedro M
Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_full Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_fullStr Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_full_unstemmed Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_short Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_sort value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing eular points to consider
topic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8609947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34810228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001864
work_keys_str_mv AT boschphilipp valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT carubbifrancesco valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT scirecarloalberto valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT baraliakosxenofon valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT falzonlouise valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT dejacochristian valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT machadopedrom valueofimagingtoguideinterventionalproceduresinrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseasesasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider