Cargando…
Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes
BACKGROUND: Self-management is a promising approach to improve quality of life after stroke. However, evidence for the appropriateness and effectiveness of self-management for stroke survivors with aphasia is limited. This article reports on the process used to develop a supported self-management in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259103 |
_version_ | 1784603071513362432 |
---|---|
author | Wray, Faye Clarke, David Cruice, Madeline Forster, Anne |
author_facet | Wray, Faye Clarke, David Cruice, Madeline Forster, Anne |
author_sort | Wray, Faye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-management is a promising approach to improve quality of life after stroke. However, evidence for the appropriateness and effectiveness of self-management for stroke survivors with aphasia is limited. This article reports on the process used to develop a supported self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia (SSWA) using co-production and behaviour change theory. Preparatory research included systematic reviews, and qualitative interviews and focus groups with SSWA, family members and speech and language therapists (SLTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted six, 2 hour long intervention development workshops with key stakeholders. The workshops were informed by principles of co-production and the intervention development process outlined by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). We also incorporated the findings of our preparatory research within workshops. Each workshop included an introduction, 1–2 co-production tasks and time for feedback at the end of the session. Data were analysed on an ongoing basis so that findings could be used to feed in to subsequent workshops and intervention development. RESULTS: Workshop participants (n = 12) included; SSWA (n = 5), family members (n = 3) and SLTs (n = 4). Together, participants engaged with accessible and participatory co-production tasks which aligned with the BCW framework. Participants engaged in discussion to define self-management in behavioural terms (behavioural diagnosis) and to identify what needed to change to support self-management. Participant’s co-produced solutions for supporting self-management and discussed options to implement these in practice. Prototype materials were generated by the research team and evaluated by participants. Intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were mapped to the solutions generated by participants by the research team, after the final workshop. A supported self-management intervention for SSWA was developed which will be delivered by SLTs through community stroke services. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reports the process we used to integrate co-production work with behaviour change theory to develop a complex self-management intervention. This is of relevance for researchers looking to harness the strengths of co-production methods and theory in intervention design. Future research will feasibility test the supported self-management intervention developed. This paper provides transparency to our intervention development process which will help others to better interpret the findings of our feasibility work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8610248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86102482021-11-24 Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes Wray, Faye Clarke, David Cruice, Madeline Forster, Anne PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-management is a promising approach to improve quality of life after stroke. However, evidence for the appropriateness and effectiveness of self-management for stroke survivors with aphasia is limited. This article reports on the process used to develop a supported self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia (SSWA) using co-production and behaviour change theory. Preparatory research included systematic reviews, and qualitative interviews and focus groups with SSWA, family members and speech and language therapists (SLTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted six, 2 hour long intervention development workshops with key stakeholders. The workshops were informed by principles of co-production and the intervention development process outlined by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). We also incorporated the findings of our preparatory research within workshops. Each workshop included an introduction, 1–2 co-production tasks and time for feedback at the end of the session. Data were analysed on an ongoing basis so that findings could be used to feed in to subsequent workshops and intervention development. RESULTS: Workshop participants (n = 12) included; SSWA (n = 5), family members (n = 3) and SLTs (n = 4). Together, participants engaged with accessible and participatory co-production tasks which aligned with the BCW framework. Participants engaged in discussion to define self-management in behavioural terms (behavioural diagnosis) and to identify what needed to change to support self-management. Participant’s co-produced solutions for supporting self-management and discussed options to implement these in practice. Prototype materials were generated by the research team and evaluated by participants. Intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were mapped to the solutions generated by participants by the research team, after the final workshop. A supported self-management intervention for SSWA was developed which will be delivered by SLTs through community stroke services. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reports the process we used to integrate co-production work with behaviour change theory to develop a complex self-management intervention. This is of relevance for researchers looking to harness the strengths of co-production methods and theory in intervention design. Future research will feasibility test the supported self-management intervention developed. This paper provides transparency to our intervention development process which will help others to better interpret the findings of our feasibility work. Public Library of Science 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8610248/ /pubmed/34813602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259103 Text en © 2021 Wray et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wray, Faye Clarke, David Cruice, Madeline Forster, Anne Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes |
title | Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes |
title_full | Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes |
title_fullStr | Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes |
title_short | Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes |
title_sort | development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: an outline of methods and processes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrayfaye developmentofaselfmanagementinterventionforstrokesurvivorswithaphasiausingcoproductionandbehaviourchangetheoryanoutlineofmethodsandprocesses AT clarkedavid developmentofaselfmanagementinterventionforstrokesurvivorswithaphasiausingcoproductionandbehaviourchangetheoryanoutlineofmethodsandprocesses AT cruicemadeline developmentofaselfmanagementinterventionforstrokesurvivorswithaphasiausingcoproductionandbehaviourchangetheoryanoutlineofmethodsandprocesses AT forsteranne developmentofaselfmanagementinterventionforstrokesurvivorswithaphasiausingcoproductionandbehaviourchangetheoryanoutlineofmethodsandprocesses |