Cargando…

Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has impacted many aspects of peoples’ quality of life (QOL). AIM: To assess the QOL of post-COVID-19 cases and determine their associated sociodemographic attributes. METHODS: A cross-sectional community-based study targeted recovered COVID-19 cases using an online questionnaire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Algamdi, Maaidah M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824527
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S340868
_version_ 1784603160591990784
author Algamdi, Maaidah M
author_facet Algamdi, Maaidah M
author_sort Algamdi, Maaidah M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has impacted many aspects of peoples’ quality of life (QOL). AIM: To assess the QOL of post-COVID-19 cases and determine their associated sociodemographic attributes. METHODS: A cross-sectional community-based study targeted recovered COVID-19 cases using an online questionnaire. An Arabic version of the Quality of Life Index (QLI) was evaluated for reliability and validity using Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman’s product moment tests, respectively. Descriptive analysis, Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis H, and Spearman correlation tests were used to investigate the relationships between QOL and study independent variables, including sociodemographic characteristics, time since infection, intention for vaccination, perception of the influence of COVID-19 on general health, history of hospitalization, and history of chronic illness. Subgroups were compared using a Student’s t-test for normally distributed data and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. RESULTS: In a sample of 449 respondents, the total QLI score was 22.64 ± 4.36; for subscales, it ranged from 20.86 ± 5.04 to 24.99 ± 4.74. Males had significantly higher health and functioning subscale (HFSUB) scores compared to females (p = 0.033). Employed cases had significantly higher social and economic subscale (SOCSUB) scores than unemployed cases (p = 0.000). Married people reported significantly higher family subscale (FAMSUB) scores (p = 0.000) than unmarried people. People who believe that their general health was affected by COVID-19 had significantly lower HFSUB and psychological and spiritual subscale (PSPSUB) scores (p = 0.000 and p = 0.021, respectively). Individuals with a history of hospital admissions scored lower on PSPSUB (p = 0.000). Age was significantly associated with both SOCSUB (p = 0.006) and FAMSUB (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic attributes of people with a history of COVID-19 revealed significant differences in some QOL domains, as measured by the Arabic version of the generic QLI. History of hospitalization and beliefs about COVID-19’s impact on general health negatively influenced individual’s HFSUB and PSPSUB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8610760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86107602021-11-24 Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index Algamdi, Maaidah M Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has impacted many aspects of peoples’ quality of life (QOL). AIM: To assess the QOL of post-COVID-19 cases and determine their associated sociodemographic attributes. METHODS: A cross-sectional community-based study targeted recovered COVID-19 cases using an online questionnaire. An Arabic version of the Quality of Life Index (QLI) was evaluated for reliability and validity using Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman’s product moment tests, respectively. Descriptive analysis, Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis H, and Spearman correlation tests were used to investigate the relationships between QOL and study independent variables, including sociodemographic characteristics, time since infection, intention for vaccination, perception of the influence of COVID-19 on general health, history of hospitalization, and history of chronic illness. Subgroups were compared using a Student’s t-test for normally distributed data and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. RESULTS: In a sample of 449 respondents, the total QLI score was 22.64 ± 4.36; for subscales, it ranged from 20.86 ± 5.04 to 24.99 ± 4.74. Males had significantly higher health and functioning subscale (HFSUB) scores compared to females (p = 0.033). Employed cases had significantly higher social and economic subscale (SOCSUB) scores than unemployed cases (p = 0.000). Married people reported significantly higher family subscale (FAMSUB) scores (p = 0.000) than unmarried people. People who believe that their general health was affected by COVID-19 had significantly lower HFSUB and psychological and spiritual subscale (PSPSUB) scores (p = 0.000 and p = 0.021, respectively). Individuals with a history of hospital admissions scored lower on PSPSUB (p = 0.000). Age was significantly associated with both SOCSUB (p = 0.006) and FAMSUB (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic attributes of people with a history of COVID-19 revealed significant differences in some QOL domains, as measured by the Arabic version of the generic QLI. History of hospitalization and beliefs about COVID-19’s impact on general health negatively influenced individual’s HFSUB and PSPSUB. Dove 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8610760/ /pubmed/34824527 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S340868 Text en © 2021 Algamdi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Algamdi, Maaidah M
Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index
title Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index
title_full Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index
title_fullStr Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index
title_short Assessment of Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life Using the Quality of Life Index
title_sort assessment of post-covid-19 quality of life using the quality of life index
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824527
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S340868
work_keys_str_mv AT algamdimaaidahm assessmentofpostcovid19qualityoflifeusingthequalityoflifeindex