Cargando…

Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma

In the era of precision medicine, biopsies are playing an increasingly central role in cancer research and treatment paradigms; however, patient outcomes and analyses of biopsy quality, as well as impact on downstream clinical and research applications, remain underreported. Herein, we report biopsy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinfurtner, Kelley, Cho, Joshua, Ackerman, Daniel, Chen, James X., Woodard, Abashai, Li, Wuyan, Ostrowski, David, Soulen, Michael C., Dagli, Mandeep, Shamimi-Noori, Susan, Mondschein, Jeffrey, Sudheendra, Deepak, Stavropoulos, S. William, Reddy, Shilpa, Redmond, Jonas, Khaddash, Tamim, Jhala, Darshana, Siegelman, Evan S., Furth, Emma E., Hunt, Stephen J., Nadolski, Gregory J., Kaplan, David E., Gade, Terence P. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02093-6
_version_ 1784603215028813824
author Weinfurtner, Kelley
Cho, Joshua
Ackerman, Daniel
Chen, James X.
Woodard, Abashai
Li, Wuyan
Ostrowski, David
Soulen, Michael C.
Dagli, Mandeep
Shamimi-Noori, Susan
Mondschein, Jeffrey
Sudheendra, Deepak
Stavropoulos, S. William
Reddy, Shilpa
Redmond, Jonas
Khaddash, Tamim
Jhala, Darshana
Siegelman, Evan S.
Furth, Emma E.
Hunt, Stephen J.
Nadolski, Gregory J.
Kaplan, David E.
Gade, Terence P. F.
author_facet Weinfurtner, Kelley
Cho, Joshua
Ackerman, Daniel
Chen, James X.
Woodard, Abashai
Li, Wuyan
Ostrowski, David
Soulen, Michael C.
Dagli, Mandeep
Shamimi-Noori, Susan
Mondschein, Jeffrey
Sudheendra, Deepak
Stavropoulos, S. William
Reddy, Shilpa
Redmond, Jonas
Khaddash, Tamim
Jhala, Darshana
Siegelman, Evan S.
Furth, Emma E.
Hunt, Stephen J.
Nadolski, Gregory J.
Kaplan, David E.
Gade, Terence P. F.
author_sort Weinfurtner, Kelley
collection PubMed
description In the era of precision medicine, biopsies are playing an increasingly central role in cancer research and treatment paradigms; however, patient outcomes and analyses of biopsy quality, as well as impact on downstream clinical and research applications, remain underreported. Herein, we report biopsy safety and quality outcomes for percutaneous core biopsies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) performed as part of a prospective clinical trial. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCC were enrolled in a prospective cohort study for the genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling of HCC at two academic medical centers from April 2016 to July 2020. Under image guidance, 18G core biopsies were obtained using coaxial technique at the time of locoregional therapy. The primary outcome was biopsy quality, defined as tumor fraction in the core biopsy. 56 HCC lesions from 50 patients underwent 60 biopsy events with a median of 8 core biopsies per procedure (interquartile range, IQR, 7–10). Malignancy was identified in 45/56 (80.4%, 4 without pathology) biopsy events, including HCC (40/56, 71.4%) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or combined HCC-CCA (5/56, 8.9%). Biopsy quality was highly variable with a median of 40% tumor in each biopsy core (IQR 10–75). Only 43/56 (76.8%) and 23/56 (41.1%) samples met quality thresholds for genomic or metabolomic/proteomic profiling, respectively, requiring expansion of the clinical trial. Overall and major complication rates were 5/60 (8.3%) and 3/60 (5.0%), respectively. Despite uniform biopsy protocol, biopsy quality varied widely with up to 59% of samples to be inadequate for intended purpose. This finding has important consequences for clinical trial design and highlights the need for quality control prior to applications in which the presence of benign cell types may substantially alter findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8611010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86110102021-11-24 Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma Weinfurtner, Kelley Cho, Joshua Ackerman, Daniel Chen, James X. Woodard, Abashai Li, Wuyan Ostrowski, David Soulen, Michael C. Dagli, Mandeep Shamimi-Noori, Susan Mondschein, Jeffrey Sudheendra, Deepak Stavropoulos, S. William Reddy, Shilpa Redmond, Jonas Khaddash, Tamim Jhala, Darshana Siegelman, Evan S. Furth, Emma E. Hunt, Stephen J. Nadolski, Gregory J. Kaplan, David E. Gade, Terence P. F. Sci Rep Article In the era of precision medicine, biopsies are playing an increasingly central role in cancer research and treatment paradigms; however, patient outcomes and analyses of biopsy quality, as well as impact on downstream clinical and research applications, remain underreported. Herein, we report biopsy safety and quality outcomes for percutaneous core biopsies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) performed as part of a prospective clinical trial. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCC were enrolled in a prospective cohort study for the genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling of HCC at two academic medical centers from April 2016 to July 2020. Under image guidance, 18G core biopsies were obtained using coaxial technique at the time of locoregional therapy. The primary outcome was biopsy quality, defined as tumor fraction in the core biopsy. 56 HCC lesions from 50 patients underwent 60 biopsy events with a median of 8 core biopsies per procedure (interquartile range, IQR, 7–10). Malignancy was identified in 45/56 (80.4%, 4 without pathology) biopsy events, including HCC (40/56, 71.4%) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or combined HCC-CCA (5/56, 8.9%). Biopsy quality was highly variable with a median of 40% tumor in each biopsy core (IQR 10–75). Only 43/56 (76.8%) and 23/56 (41.1%) samples met quality thresholds for genomic or metabolomic/proteomic profiling, respectively, requiring expansion of the clinical trial. Overall and major complication rates were 5/60 (8.3%) and 3/60 (5.0%), respectively. Despite uniform biopsy protocol, biopsy quality varied widely with up to 59% of samples to be inadequate for intended purpose. This finding has important consequences for clinical trial design and highlights the need for quality control prior to applications in which the presence of benign cell types may substantially alter findings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8611010/ /pubmed/34815453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02093-6 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Weinfurtner, Kelley
Cho, Joshua
Ackerman, Daniel
Chen, James X.
Woodard, Abashai
Li, Wuyan
Ostrowski, David
Soulen, Michael C.
Dagli, Mandeep
Shamimi-Noori, Susan
Mondschein, Jeffrey
Sudheendra, Deepak
Stavropoulos, S. William
Reddy, Shilpa
Redmond, Jonas
Khaddash, Tamim
Jhala, Darshana
Siegelman, Evan S.
Furth, Emma E.
Hunt, Stephen J.
Nadolski, Gregory J.
Kaplan, David E.
Gade, Terence P. F.
Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
title Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02093-6
work_keys_str_mv AT weinfurtnerkelley variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chojoshua variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ackermandaniel variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenjamesx variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT woodardabashai variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liwuyan variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ostrowskidavid variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT soulenmichaelc variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT daglimandeep variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shamiminoorisusan variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT mondscheinjeffrey variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sudheendradeepak variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT stavropoulosswilliam variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT reddyshilpa variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT redmondjonas variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT khaddashtamim variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT jhaladarshana variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT siegelmanevans variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT furthemmae variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT huntstephenj variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT nadolskigregoryj variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kaplandavide variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT gadeterencepf variabilityinbiopsyqualityinformstranslationalresearchapplicationsinhepatocellularcarcinoma