Cargando…
MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination
OBJECTIVE: To establish a good method to determine the retinal shape from MRI using three-dimensional (3D) ellipsoids as well as evaluate its reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The left eyes of 31 volunteers were imaged using high-resolution ocular MRI. The 3D MR-images were segmented and ellips...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000855 |
_version_ | 1784603295690522624 |
---|---|
author | van Vught, Luc Shamonin, Denis P Luyten, Gregorius P M Stoel, Berend C Beenakker, Jan-Willem M |
author_facet | van Vught, Luc Shamonin, Denis P Luyten, Gregorius P M Stoel, Berend C Beenakker, Jan-Willem M |
author_sort | van Vught, Luc |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To establish a good method to determine the retinal shape from MRI using three-dimensional (3D) ellipsoids as well as evaluate its reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The left eyes of 31 volunteers were imaged using high-resolution ocular MRI. The 3D MR-images were segmented and ellipsoids were fitted to the resulting contours. The dependency of the resulting ellipsoid parameters on the evaluated fraction of the retinal contour was assessed by fitting ellipsoids to 41 different fractions. Furthermore, the reproducibility of the complete procedure was evaluated in four subjects. Finally, a comparison with conventional two-dimensional (2D) methods was made. RESULTS: The mean distance between the fitted ellipsoids and the segmented retinal contour was 0.03±0.01 mm (mean±SD) for the central retina and 0.13±0.03 mm for the peripheral retina. For the central retina, the resulting ellipsoid radii were 12.9±0.9, 13.7±1.5 and 12.2±1.2 mm along the horizontal, vertical and central axes. For the peripheral retina, these radii decreased to 11.9±0.6, 11.6±0.4 and 10.4±0.7 mm, which was accompanied by a mean 1.8 mm posterior shift of the ellipsoid centre. The reproducibility of the ellipsoid fitting was 0.3±1.2 mm for the central retina and 0.0±0.1 mm for the peripheral retina. When 2D methods were used to fit the peripheral retina, the fitted radii differed a mean 0.1±0.1 mm from the 3D method. CONCLUSION: An accurate and reproducible determination of the 3D retinal shape based on MRI is provided together with 2D alternatives, enabling wider use of this method in the field of ophthalmology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8611437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86114372021-12-10 MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination van Vught, Luc Shamonin, Denis P Luyten, Gregorius P M Stoel, Berend C Beenakker, Jan-Willem M BMJ Open Ophthalmol Vision Science OBJECTIVE: To establish a good method to determine the retinal shape from MRI using three-dimensional (3D) ellipsoids as well as evaluate its reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The left eyes of 31 volunteers were imaged using high-resolution ocular MRI. The 3D MR-images were segmented and ellipsoids were fitted to the resulting contours. The dependency of the resulting ellipsoid parameters on the evaluated fraction of the retinal contour was assessed by fitting ellipsoids to 41 different fractions. Furthermore, the reproducibility of the complete procedure was evaluated in four subjects. Finally, a comparison with conventional two-dimensional (2D) methods was made. RESULTS: The mean distance between the fitted ellipsoids and the segmented retinal contour was 0.03±0.01 mm (mean±SD) for the central retina and 0.13±0.03 mm for the peripheral retina. For the central retina, the resulting ellipsoid radii were 12.9±0.9, 13.7±1.5 and 12.2±1.2 mm along the horizontal, vertical and central axes. For the peripheral retina, these radii decreased to 11.9±0.6, 11.6±0.4 and 10.4±0.7 mm, which was accompanied by a mean 1.8 mm posterior shift of the ellipsoid centre. The reproducibility of the ellipsoid fitting was 0.3±1.2 mm for the central retina and 0.0±0.1 mm for the peripheral retina. When 2D methods were used to fit the peripheral retina, the fitted radii differed a mean 0.1±0.1 mm from the 3D method. CONCLUSION: An accurate and reproducible determination of the 3D retinal shape based on MRI is provided together with 2D alternatives, enabling wider use of this method in the field of ophthalmology. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8611437/ /pubmed/34901465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000855 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Vision Science van Vught, Luc Shamonin, Denis P Luyten, Gregorius P M Stoel, Berend C Beenakker, Jan-Willem M MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination |
title | MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination |
title_full | MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination |
title_fullStr | MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination |
title_short | MRI-based 3D retinal shape determination |
title_sort | mri-based 3d retinal shape determination |
topic | Vision Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanvughtluc mribased3dretinalshapedetermination AT shamonindenisp mribased3dretinalshapedetermination AT luytengregoriuspm mribased3dretinalshapedetermination AT stoelberendc mribased3dretinalshapedetermination AT beenakkerjanwillemm mribased3dretinalshapedetermination |