Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects

OBJECTIVES: With an uprising influence of social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram a multitude of worldwide accessible information is available. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the exchange of medical information about several topics related to this infectious disease and its vacci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lentzen, Max-Philipp, Huebenthal, Viola, Kaiser, Rolf, Kreppel, Matthias, Zoeller, Joachim E., Zirk, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.052
_version_ 1784603329441038336
author Lentzen, Max-Philipp
Huebenthal, Viola
Kaiser, Rolf
Kreppel, Matthias
Zoeller, Joachim E.
Zirk, Matthias
author_facet Lentzen, Max-Philipp
Huebenthal, Viola
Kaiser, Rolf
Kreppel, Matthias
Zoeller, Joachim E.
Zirk, Matthias
author_sort Lentzen, Max-Philipp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: With an uprising influence of social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram a multitude of worldwide accessible information is available. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the exchange of medical information about several topics related to this infectious disease and its vaccination has increased rapidly. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the content associated with COVID-19 vaccination and its side effects and evaluate its educational quality. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to investigate 600 Twitter and Instagram posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects due to number of ‘likes’, comments, type of post, language, its purpose and source. In addition, posts were evaluated due to educational quality by three examiners of different educational levels. RESULTS: The majority of posts showed 0 to 50 “likes” and 0 to 5 comments in English language. A comparison between Twitter and Instagram by the influence of application showed significant differences in number of posts and “likes” or comments (p < 0.05). The major post type were texts for Twitter (251; 83.7%) and videos for Instagram (104; 34.7%). While a majority of posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects report about the occurrence of side effects, the majority of them were mild and general COVID-19 vaccination feedback during the first 4 months was positive. But, only 3 to 7% were rated by “excellent” educational and validatable content. Interrater reliability between all three examiners presented a high concordance with 89% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents an analysis of quantity and quality of social media content according to COVID-19 vaccinations and its side effects. It supports the deduction that most of the content on Twitter and Instagram is shared by patients and unclear sources and thus is limited informative. Nevertheless, influence of social media on medical information especially during COVID-19 pandemic is increasing and practitioners have to face its effect on their patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8611612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86116122021-11-24 A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects Lentzen, Max-Philipp Huebenthal, Viola Kaiser, Rolf Kreppel, Matthias Zoeller, Joachim E. Zirk, Matthias Vaccine Article OBJECTIVES: With an uprising influence of social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram a multitude of worldwide accessible information is available. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the exchange of medical information about several topics related to this infectious disease and its vaccination has increased rapidly. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the content associated with COVID-19 vaccination and its side effects and evaluate its educational quality. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to investigate 600 Twitter and Instagram posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects due to number of ‘likes’, comments, type of post, language, its purpose and source. In addition, posts were evaluated due to educational quality by three examiners of different educational levels. RESULTS: The majority of posts showed 0 to 50 “likes” and 0 to 5 comments in English language. A comparison between Twitter and Instagram by the influence of application showed significant differences in number of posts and “likes” or comments (p < 0.05). The major post type were texts for Twitter (251; 83.7%) and videos for Instagram (104; 34.7%). While a majority of posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects report about the occurrence of side effects, the majority of them were mild and general COVID-19 vaccination feedback during the first 4 months was positive. But, only 3 to 7% were rated by “excellent” educational and validatable content. Interrater reliability between all three examiners presented a high concordance with 89% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents an analysis of quantity and quality of social media content according to COVID-19 vaccinations and its side effects. It supports the deduction that most of the content on Twitter and Instagram is shared by patients and unclear sources and thus is limited informative. Nevertheless, influence of social media on medical information especially during COVID-19 pandemic is increasing and practitioners have to face its effect on their patients. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-01-03 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8611612/ /pubmed/34857421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.052 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Lentzen, Max-Philipp
Huebenthal, Viola
Kaiser, Rolf
Kreppel, Matthias
Zoeller, Joachim E.
Zirk, Matthias
A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects
title A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects
title_full A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects
title_short A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects
title_sort retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to covid-19 vaccination side effects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.052
work_keys_str_mv AT lentzenmaxphilipp aretrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT huebenthalviola aretrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT kaiserrolf aretrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT kreppelmatthias aretrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT zoellerjoachime aretrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT zirkmatthias aretrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT lentzenmaxphilipp retrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT huebenthalviola retrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT kaiserrolf retrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT kreppelmatthias retrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT zoellerjoachime retrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects
AT zirkmatthias retrospectiveanalysisofsocialmediapostspertainingtocovid19vaccinationsideeffects