Cargando…

Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey

BACKGROUND: Digital technologies are shaping medicine and public health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes toward and the use of digital technologies for health-related purposes using a nationwide survey. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using a panel sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Santis, Karina Karolina, Jahnel, Tina, Sina, Elida, Wienert, Julian, Zeeb, Hajo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813493
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32951
_version_ 1784603417131352064
author De Santis, Karina Karolina
Jahnel, Tina
Sina, Elida
Wienert, Julian
Zeeb, Hajo
author_facet De Santis, Karina Karolina
Jahnel, Tina
Sina, Elida
Wienert, Julian
Zeeb, Hajo
author_sort De Santis, Karina Karolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital technologies are shaping medicine and public health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes toward and the use of digital technologies for health-related purposes using a nationwide survey. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using a panel sample of internet users selected from the general population living in Germany. Responses to a survey with 28 items were collected using computer-assisted telephone interviews conducted in October 2020. The items were divided into four topics: (1) general attitudes toward digitization, (2) COVID-19 pandemic, (3) physical activity, and (4) perceived digital health (eHealth) literacy measured with the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS; sum score of 8=lowest to 40=highest perceived eHealth literacy). The data were analyzed in IBM-SPSS24 using relative frequencies. Three univariate multiple regression analyses (linear or binary logistic) were performed to investigate the associations among the sociodemographic factors (age, gender, education, and household income) and digital technology use. RESULTS: The participants included 1014 internet users (n=528, 52.07% women) aged 14 to 93 years (mean 54, SD 17). Among all participants, 66.47% (674/1014) completed up to tertiary (primary and secondary) education and 45.07% (457/1017) reported a household income of up to 3500 Euro/month (1 Euro=US $1.18). Over half (579/1014, 57.10%) reported having used digital technologies for health-related purposes. The majority (898/1014, 88.56%) noted that digitization will be important for therapy and health care, in the future. Only 25.64% (260/1014) reported interest in smartphone apps for health promotion/prevention and 42.70% (433/1014) downloaded the COVID-19 contact-tracing app. Although 52.47% (532/1014) reported that they come across inaccurate digital information on the COVID-19 pandemic, 78.01% (791/1014) were confident in their ability to recognize such inaccurate information. Among those who use digital technologies for moderate physical activity (n=220), 187 (85.0%) found such technologies easy to use and 140 (63.6%) reported using them regularly (at least once a week). Although the perceived eHealth literacy was high (eHEALS mean score 31 points, SD 6), less than half (43.10%, 400/928) were confident in using digital information for health decisions. The use of digital technologies for health was associated with higher household income (odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.47). The use of digital technologies for physical activity was associated with younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) and more education (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.46). A higher perceived eHealth literacy score was associated with younger age (β=–.22, P<.001), higher household income (β=.21, P<.001), and more education (β=.14, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Internet users in Germany expect that digitization will affect preventive and therapeutic health care in the future. The facilitators and barriers associated with the use of digital technologies for health warrant further research. A gap exists between high confidence in the perceived ability to evaluate digital information and low trust in internet-based information on the COVID-19 pandemic and health decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8612128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86121282021-12-13 Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey De Santis, Karina Karolina Jahnel, Tina Sina, Elida Wienert, Julian Zeeb, Hajo JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital technologies are shaping medicine and public health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes toward and the use of digital technologies for health-related purposes using a nationwide survey. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using a panel sample of internet users selected from the general population living in Germany. Responses to a survey with 28 items were collected using computer-assisted telephone interviews conducted in October 2020. The items were divided into four topics: (1) general attitudes toward digitization, (2) COVID-19 pandemic, (3) physical activity, and (4) perceived digital health (eHealth) literacy measured with the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS; sum score of 8=lowest to 40=highest perceived eHealth literacy). The data were analyzed in IBM-SPSS24 using relative frequencies. Three univariate multiple regression analyses (linear or binary logistic) were performed to investigate the associations among the sociodemographic factors (age, gender, education, and household income) and digital technology use. RESULTS: The participants included 1014 internet users (n=528, 52.07% women) aged 14 to 93 years (mean 54, SD 17). Among all participants, 66.47% (674/1014) completed up to tertiary (primary and secondary) education and 45.07% (457/1017) reported a household income of up to 3500 Euro/month (1 Euro=US $1.18). Over half (579/1014, 57.10%) reported having used digital technologies for health-related purposes. The majority (898/1014, 88.56%) noted that digitization will be important for therapy and health care, in the future. Only 25.64% (260/1014) reported interest in smartphone apps for health promotion/prevention and 42.70% (433/1014) downloaded the COVID-19 contact-tracing app. Although 52.47% (532/1014) reported that they come across inaccurate digital information on the COVID-19 pandemic, 78.01% (791/1014) were confident in their ability to recognize such inaccurate information. Among those who use digital technologies for moderate physical activity (n=220), 187 (85.0%) found such technologies easy to use and 140 (63.6%) reported using them regularly (at least once a week). Although the perceived eHealth literacy was high (eHEALS mean score 31 points, SD 6), less than half (43.10%, 400/928) were confident in using digital information for health decisions. The use of digital technologies for health was associated with higher household income (odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.47). The use of digital technologies for physical activity was associated with younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) and more education (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.46). A higher perceived eHealth literacy score was associated with younger age (β=–.22, P<.001), higher household income (β=.21, P<.001), and more education (β=.14, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Internet users in Germany expect that digitization will affect preventive and therapeutic health care in the future. The facilitators and barriers associated with the use of digital technologies for health warrant further research. A gap exists between high confidence in the perceived ability to evaluate digital information and low trust in internet-based information on the COVID-19 pandemic and health decisions. JMIR Publications 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8612128/ /pubmed/34813493 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32951 Text en ©Karina Karolina De Santis, Tina Jahnel, Elida Sina, Julian Wienert, Hajo Zeeb. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 22.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
De Santis, Karina Karolina
Jahnel, Tina
Sina, Elida
Wienert, Julian
Zeeb, Hajo
Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey
title Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey
title_full Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey
title_fullStr Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey
title_full_unstemmed Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey
title_short Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey
title_sort digitization and health in germany: cross-sectional nationwide survey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813493
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32951
work_keys_str_mv AT desantiskarinakarolina digitizationandhealthingermanycrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT jahneltina digitizationandhealthingermanycrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT sinaelida digitizationandhealthingermanycrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT wienertjulian digitizationandhealthingermanycrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT zeebhajo digitizationandhealthingermanycrosssectionalnationwidesurvey