Cargando…
Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase 3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All eligible stage IIIA (cN2) and st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Nuclear Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260646 |
_version_ | 1784603426380840960 |
---|---|
author | Guberina, Maja Pöttgen, Christoph Metzenmacher, Martin Wiesweg, Marcel Schuler, Martin Aigner, Clemens Ploenes, Till Umutlu, Lale Gauler, Thomas Darwiche, Kaid Stamatis, Georgios Theegarten, Dirk Hautzel, Hubertus Jentzen, Walter Guberina, Nika Herrmann, Ken Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E. Stuschke, Martin |
author_facet | Guberina, Maja Pöttgen, Christoph Metzenmacher, Martin Wiesweg, Marcel Schuler, Martin Aigner, Clemens Ploenes, Till Umutlu, Lale Gauler, Thomas Darwiche, Kaid Stamatis, Georgios Theegarten, Dirk Hautzel, Hubertus Jentzen, Walter Guberina, Nika Herrmann, Ken Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E. Stuschke, Martin |
author_sort | Guberina, Maja |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase 3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All eligible stage IIIA (cN2) and stage IIIB patients in the trial received an induction doublet chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles with cisplatin and paclitaxel, and subsequent combined chemoradiotherapy with a cumulative dose of up to 45 Gy (1.5 Gy per fraction twice a day), followed by a radiation boost (2 Gy once per day) with concurrent continuation of doublet chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine. The protocol definition prescribed a total dose of 65–71 Gy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at study entry and before concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Interim PET metrics and known prognostic clinical parameters were correlated in uni- and multivariable survival analyses. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to show internal validity. Results: Ninety-two patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT after induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Median posttreatment MTV was 5.9 cm(3). Altogether, 85 patients completed the whole chemoradiation with the planned total dose of 60–71 Gy. In univariable proportional-hazards analysis, each of 3 parameters—posttreatment MTV, posttreatment SUV(max), and posttreatment maximum total lesion glycolysis (TLG(max(post)))—was associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariable survival analysis, including clinical and postinduction PET parameters, found TLG(max(post)) (hazard ratio, 1.032 [95% CI, 1.013–1.052] per 100 cm(3) increase) and total radiation dose (hazard ratio, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.902–0.959] per 1 Gy increase) was significantly related to overall survival in the whole group of patients and in patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. The best leave-one-out cross-validated 2-parameter classifier was TLG(max(post)) and total radiation dose. TLG(max(post)) was associated with time to distant metastases (P = 0.0018), and posttreatment SUV(max) was associated with time to locoregional relapse (P = 0.039), in multivariable analysis of patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. Conclusion: Postinduction chemotherapy PET parameters demonstrated prognostic significance. Therefore, interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT is a promising diagnostic modality for guiding individualized treatment intensification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8612197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society of Nuclear Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86121972022-06-01 Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Guberina, Maja Pöttgen, Christoph Metzenmacher, Martin Wiesweg, Marcel Schuler, Martin Aigner, Clemens Ploenes, Till Umutlu, Lale Gauler, Thomas Darwiche, Kaid Stamatis, Georgios Theegarten, Dirk Hautzel, Hubertus Jentzen, Walter Guberina, Nika Herrmann, Ken Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E. Stuschke, Martin J Nucl Med Clinical Investigation The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase 3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All eligible stage IIIA (cN2) and stage IIIB patients in the trial received an induction doublet chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles with cisplatin and paclitaxel, and subsequent combined chemoradiotherapy with a cumulative dose of up to 45 Gy (1.5 Gy per fraction twice a day), followed by a radiation boost (2 Gy once per day) with concurrent continuation of doublet chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine. The protocol definition prescribed a total dose of 65–71 Gy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at study entry and before concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Interim PET metrics and known prognostic clinical parameters were correlated in uni- and multivariable survival analyses. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to show internal validity. Results: Ninety-two patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT after induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Median posttreatment MTV was 5.9 cm(3). Altogether, 85 patients completed the whole chemoradiation with the planned total dose of 60–71 Gy. In univariable proportional-hazards analysis, each of 3 parameters—posttreatment MTV, posttreatment SUV(max), and posttreatment maximum total lesion glycolysis (TLG(max(post)))—was associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariable survival analysis, including clinical and postinduction PET parameters, found TLG(max(post)) (hazard ratio, 1.032 [95% CI, 1.013–1.052] per 100 cm(3) increase) and total radiation dose (hazard ratio, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.902–0.959] per 1 Gy increase) was significantly related to overall survival in the whole group of patients and in patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. The best leave-one-out cross-validated 2-parameter classifier was TLG(max(post)) and total radiation dose. TLG(max(post)) was associated with time to distant metastases (P = 0.0018), and posttreatment SUV(max) was associated with time to locoregional relapse (P = 0.039), in multivariable analysis of patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. Conclusion: Postinduction chemotherapy PET parameters demonstrated prognostic significance. Therefore, interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT is a promising diagnostic modality for guiding individualized treatment intensification. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8612197/ /pubmed/34016730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260646 Text en © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Guberina, Maja Pöttgen, Christoph Metzenmacher, Martin Wiesweg, Marcel Schuler, Martin Aigner, Clemens Ploenes, Till Umutlu, Lale Gauler, Thomas Darwiche, Kaid Stamatis, Georgios Theegarten, Dirk Hautzel, Hubertus Jentzen, Walter Guberina, Nika Herrmann, Ken Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E. Stuschke, Martin Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title | Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_full | Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_short | Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_sort | prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy volumetric pet/ct parameters for stage iiia or iiib non–small cell lung cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guberinamaja prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT pottgenchristoph prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT metzenmachermartin prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT wieswegmarcel prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT schulermartin prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT aignerclemens prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT ploenestill prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT umutlulale prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT gaulerthomas prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT darwichekaid prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT stamatisgeorgios prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT theegartendirk prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT hautzelhubertus prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT jentzenwalter prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT guberinanika prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT herrmannken prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT eberhardtwilfriedee prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT stuschkemartin prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy |