Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase 3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All eligible stage IIIA (cN2) and st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guberina, Maja, Pöttgen, Christoph, Metzenmacher, Martin, Wiesweg, Marcel, Schuler, Martin, Aigner, Clemens, Ploenes, Till, Umutlu, Lale, Gauler, Thomas, Darwiche, Kaid, Stamatis, Georgios, Theegarten, Dirk, Hautzel, Hubertus, Jentzen, Walter, Guberina, Nika, Herrmann, Ken, Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E., Stuschke, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016730
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260646
_version_ 1784603426380840960
author Guberina, Maja
Pöttgen, Christoph
Metzenmacher, Martin
Wiesweg, Marcel
Schuler, Martin
Aigner, Clemens
Ploenes, Till
Umutlu, Lale
Gauler, Thomas
Darwiche, Kaid
Stamatis, Georgios
Theegarten, Dirk
Hautzel, Hubertus
Jentzen, Walter
Guberina, Nika
Herrmann, Ken
Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E.
Stuschke, Martin
author_facet Guberina, Maja
Pöttgen, Christoph
Metzenmacher, Martin
Wiesweg, Marcel
Schuler, Martin
Aigner, Clemens
Ploenes, Till
Umutlu, Lale
Gauler, Thomas
Darwiche, Kaid
Stamatis, Georgios
Theegarten, Dirk
Hautzel, Hubertus
Jentzen, Walter
Guberina, Nika
Herrmann, Ken
Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E.
Stuschke, Martin
author_sort Guberina, Maja
collection PubMed
description The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase 3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All eligible stage IIIA (cN2) and stage IIIB patients in the trial received an induction doublet chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles with cisplatin and paclitaxel, and subsequent combined chemoradiotherapy with a cumulative dose of up to 45 Gy (1.5 Gy per fraction twice a day), followed by a radiation boost (2 Gy once per day) with concurrent continuation of doublet chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine. The protocol definition prescribed a total dose of 65–71 Gy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at study entry and before concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Interim PET metrics and known prognostic clinical parameters were correlated in uni- and multivariable survival analyses. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to show internal validity. Results: Ninety-two patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT after induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Median posttreatment MTV was 5.9 cm(3). Altogether, 85 patients completed the whole chemoradiation with the planned total dose of 60–71 Gy. In univariable proportional-hazards analysis, each of 3 parameters—posttreatment MTV, posttreatment SUV(max), and posttreatment maximum total lesion glycolysis (TLG(max(post)))—was associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariable survival analysis, including clinical and postinduction PET parameters, found TLG(max(post)) (hazard ratio, 1.032 [95% CI, 1.013–1.052] per 100 cm(3) increase) and total radiation dose (hazard ratio, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.902–0.959] per 1 Gy increase) was significantly related to overall survival in the whole group of patients and in patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. The best leave-one-out cross-validated 2-parameter classifier was TLG(max(post)) and total radiation dose. TLG(max(post)) was associated with time to distant metastases (P = 0.0018), and posttreatment SUV(max) was associated with time to locoregional relapse (P = 0.039), in multivariable analysis of patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. Conclusion: Postinduction chemotherapy PET parameters demonstrated prognostic significance. Therefore, interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT is a promising diagnostic modality for guiding individualized treatment intensification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8612197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86121972022-06-01 Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Guberina, Maja Pöttgen, Christoph Metzenmacher, Martin Wiesweg, Marcel Schuler, Martin Aigner, Clemens Ploenes, Till Umutlu, Lale Gauler, Thomas Darwiche, Kaid Stamatis, Georgios Theegarten, Dirk Hautzel, Hubertus Jentzen, Walter Guberina, Nika Herrmann, Ken Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E. Stuschke, Martin J Nucl Med Clinical Investigation The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase 3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All eligible stage IIIA (cN2) and stage IIIB patients in the trial received an induction doublet chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles with cisplatin and paclitaxel, and subsequent combined chemoradiotherapy with a cumulative dose of up to 45 Gy (1.5 Gy per fraction twice a day), followed by a radiation boost (2 Gy once per day) with concurrent continuation of doublet chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine. The protocol definition prescribed a total dose of 65–71 Gy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at study entry and before concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Interim PET metrics and known prognostic clinical parameters were correlated in uni- and multivariable survival analyses. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to show internal validity. Results: Ninety-two patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT after induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Median posttreatment MTV was 5.9 cm(3). Altogether, 85 patients completed the whole chemoradiation with the planned total dose of 60–71 Gy. In univariable proportional-hazards analysis, each of 3 parameters—posttreatment MTV, posttreatment SUV(max), and posttreatment maximum total lesion glycolysis (TLG(max(post)))—was associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariable survival analysis, including clinical and postinduction PET parameters, found TLG(max(post)) (hazard ratio, 1.032 [95% CI, 1.013–1.052] per 100 cm(3) increase) and total radiation dose (hazard ratio, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.902–0.959] per 1 Gy increase) was significantly related to overall survival in the whole group of patients and in patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. The best leave-one-out cross-validated 2-parameter classifier was TLG(max(post)) and total radiation dose. TLG(max(post)) was associated with time to distant metastases (P = 0.0018), and posttreatment SUV(max) was associated with time to locoregional relapse (P = 0.039), in multivariable analysis of patients receiving a total dose of at least 60 Gy. Conclusion: Postinduction chemotherapy PET parameters demonstrated prognostic significance. Therefore, interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT is a promising diagnostic modality for guiding individualized treatment intensification. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8612197/ /pubmed/34016730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260646 Text en © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Guberina, Maja
Pöttgen, Christoph
Metzenmacher, Martin
Wiesweg, Marcel
Schuler, Martin
Aigner, Clemens
Ploenes, Till
Umutlu, Lale
Gauler, Thomas
Darwiche, Kaid
Stamatis, Georgios
Theegarten, Dirk
Hautzel, Hubertus
Jentzen, Walter
Guberina, Nika
Herrmann, Ken
Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E.
Stuschke, Martin
Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
title Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
title_full Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
title_short Prognostic Value of Postinduction Chemotherapy Volumetric PET/CT Parameters for Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
title_sort prognostic value of postinduction chemotherapy volumetric pet/ct parameters for stage iiia or iiib non–small cell lung cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016730
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260646
work_keys_str_mv AT guberinamaja prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT pottgenchristoph prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT metzenmachermartin prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT wieswegmarcel prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT schulermartin prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT aignerclemens prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT ploenestill prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT umutlulale prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT gaulerthomas prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT darwichekaid prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT stamatisgeorgios prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT theegartendirk prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT hautzelhubertus prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT jentzenwalter prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT guberinanika prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT herrmannken prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT eberhardtwilfriedee prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy
AT stuschkemartin prognosticvalueofpostinductionchemotherapyvolumetricpetctparametersforstageiiiaoriiibnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsreceivingdefinitivechemoradiotherapy