Cargando…

A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?

BACKGROUND: Patients discharged to the ward from an intensive care unit (ICU) commonly experience a reduction in mobility but few mobility interventions. Barriers and facilitators for mobilisation on acute wards after discharge from an ICU were explored. DESIGN AND METHODS: A human factors analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gustafson, O.D., Vollam, S., Morgan, L., Watkinson, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34571285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.03.013
_version_ 1784603433918005248
author Gustafson, O.D.
Vollam, S.
Morgan, L.
Watkinson, P.
author_facet Gustafson, O.D.
Vollam, S.
Morgan, L.
Watkinson, P.
author_sort Gustafson, O.D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients discharged to the ward from an intensive care unit (ICU) commonly experience a reduction in mobility but few mobility interventions. Barriers and facilitators for mobilisation on acute wards after discharge from an ICU were explored. DESIGN AND METHODS: A human factors analysis was undertaken using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) as part of the Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment (REFLECT) study. A FRAM focus group was formed from members of the ICU and ward multidisciplinary teams from two hospitals, with experience of working in six hospitals. They identified factors influencing mobilisation and the interdependency of these factors. RESULTS: Patients requiring discharge assessments or on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways compete for priority with post-ICU patients with more urgent rehabilitation needs. Patients unable to stand and step to a chair or requiring mobilisation equipment were deemed particularly susceptible to missing mobilisation interventions. The ability to mobilise was perceived to be highly influenced by multidisciplinary staffing levels and skill mix. These factors are interdependent in facilitating or inhibiting mobilisation. CONCLUSIONS: This human factors analysis of post-ICU mobilisation highlighted several influencing factors and demonstrated their interdependency. Future interventions should focus on mitigating competing priorities to ensure regular mobilisation, target patients unable to stand and step to a chair on discharge from ICU and create robust processes to ensure suitable equipment availability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14658054
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8612273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86122732021-12-01 A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care? Gustafson, O.D. Vollam, S. Morgan, L. Watkinson, P. Physiotherapy Expert Article BACKGROUND: Patients discharged to the ward from an intensive care unit (ICU) commonly experience a reduction in mobility but few mobility interventions. Barriers and facilitators for mobilisation on acute wards after discharge from an ICU were explored. DESIGN AND METHODS: A human factors analysis was undertaken using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) as part of the Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment (REFLECT) study. A FRAM focus group was formed from members of the ICU and ward multidisciplinary teams from two hospitals, with experience of working in six hospitals. They identified factors influencing mobilisation and the interdependency of these factors. RESULTS: Patients requiring discharge assessments or on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways compete for priority with post-ICU patients with more urgent rehabilitation needs. Patients unable to stand and step to a chair or requiring mobilisation equipment were deemed particularly susceptible to missing mobilisation interventions. The ability to mobilise was perceived to be highly influenced by multidisciplinary staffing levels and skill mix. These factors are interdependent in facilitating or inhibiting mobilisation. CONCLUSIONS: This human factors analysis of post-ICU mobilisation highlighted several influencing factors and demonstrated their interdependency. Future interventions should focus on mitigating competing priorities to ensure regular mobilisation, target patients unable to stand and step to a chair on discharge from ICU and create robust processes to ensure suitable equipment availability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14658054 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8612273/ /pubmed/34571285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.03.013 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Expert Article
Gustafson, O.D.
Vollam, S.
Morgan, L.
Watkinson, P.
A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
title A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
title_full A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
title_fullStr A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
title_full_unstemmed A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
title_short A human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
title_sort human factors analysis of missed mobilisation after discharge from intensive care: a competition for care?
topic Expert Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34571285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.03.013
work_keys_str_mv AT gustafsonod ahumanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT vollams ahumanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT morganl ahumanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT watkinsonp ahumanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT gustafsonod humanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT vollams humanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT morganl humanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare
AT watkinsonp humanfactorsanalysisofmissedmobilisationafterdischargefromintensivecareacompetitionforcare