Cargando…

Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight

OBJECTIVE: First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) is a primary care model where expert musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapists undertake the first patient consultation, to enhance MSK-patient care and free-up GP capacity. The authors report the qualitative findings from the FCP National Evaluation (Phase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwin, R., Moffatt, F., Hendrick, P., Stynes, S., Bishop, A., Logan, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.003
_version_ 1784603434632085504
author Goodwin, R.
Moffatt, F.
Hendrick, P.
Stynes, S.
Bishop, A.
Logan, P.
author_facet Goodwin, R.
Moffatt, F.
Hendrick, P.
Stynes, S.
Bishop, A.
Logan, P.
author_sort Goodwin, R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) is a primary care model where expert musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapists undertake the first patient consultation, to enhance MSK-patient care and free-up GP capacity. The authors report the qualitative findings from the FCP National Evaluation (Phase 3) which evaluated the FCP model against pre-agreed success criteria. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-methods 24-month service evaluation involving FCP sites across England. METHODS: Data were collected at 2 time points, year 1 and year 2. Data were collected using individual interviews and focus groups, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from all stakeholder groups; patients, physiotherapists, general practitioners and administration staff. RESULTS: A total of 6 sites were recruited over both rounds of data collection demonstrating a wide range of service models. Thirty-nine participants were recruited including fourteen patients. All six qualitative success criteria were met. GPs’ discourse reflected confidence in the FCP service and competence of the FCPs. Patient discourse reflected self-efficacy and confidence in self-management techniques and reported FCP as a positive experience. FCPs saw providing advice about work related issues as integral to their role and patient discourse reflected perceived benefit from the advice offered. Staff discourse reflected a positive experience of working with, and in, the FCP services. CONCLUSION: Ahead of the planned scale-up of the FCP primary care model across the UK, this evaluation provides useful insights and recommendations to facilitate successful FCP implementation in terms of patient outcome and experience, and staff experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8612276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86122762021-12-01 Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight Goodwin, R. Moffatt, F. Hendrick, P. Stynes, S. Bishop, A. Logan, P. Physiotherapy Expert Article OBJECTIVE: First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) is a primary care model where expert musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapists undertake the first patient consultation, to enhance MSK-patient care and free-up GP capacity. The authors report the qualitative findings from the FCP National Evaluation (Phase 3) which evaluated the FCP model against pre-agreed success criteria. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-methods 24-month service evaluation involving FCP sites across England. METHODS: Data were collected at 2 time points, year 1 and year 2. Data were collected using individual interviews and focus groups, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from all stakeholder groups; patients, physiotherapists, general practitioners and administration staff. RESULTS: A total of 6 sites were recruited over both rounds of data collection demonstrating a wide range of service models. Thirty-nine participants were recruited including fourteen patients. All six qualitative success criteria were met. GPs’ discourse reflected confidence in the FCP service and competence of the FCPs. Patient discourse reflected self-efficacy and confidence in self-management techniques and reported FCP as a positive experience. FCPs saw providing advice about work related issues as integral to their role and patient discourse reflected perceived benefit from the advice offered. Staff discourse reflected a positive experience of working with, and in, the FCP services. CONCLUSION: Ahead of the planned scale-up of the FCP primary care model across the UK, this evaluation provides useful insights and recommendations to facilitate successful FCP implementation in terms of patient outcome and experience, and staff experience. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8612276/ /pubmed/34583834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Expert Article
Goodwin, R.
Moffatt, F.
Hendrick, P.
Stynes, S.
Bishop, A.
Logan, P.
Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
title Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
title_full Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
title_fullStr Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
title_short Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
title_sort evaluation of the first contact physiotherapy (fcp) model of primary care: a qualitative insight
topic Expert Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwinr evaluationofthefirstcontactphysiotherapyfcpmodelofprimarycareaqualitativeinsight
AT moffattf evaluationofthefirstcontactphysiotherapyfcpmodelofprimarycareaqualitativeinsight
AT hendrickp evaluationofthefirstcontactphysiotherapyfcpmodelofprimarycareaqualitativeinsight
AT styness evaluationofthefirstcontactphysiotherapyfcpmodelofprimarycareaqualitativeinsight
AT bishopa evaluationofthefirstcontactphysiotherapyfcpmodelofprimarycareaqualitativeinsight
AT loganp evaluationofthefirstcontactphysiotherapyfcpmodelofprimarycareaqualitativeinsight