Cargando…
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
BACKGROUND: Blinding reviewers to applicant identity has been proposed to reduce bias in peer review. METHODS: This experimental test used 1200 NIH grant applications, 400 from Black investigators, 400 matched applications from White investigators, and 400 randomly selected applications from White i...
Autores principales: | Nakamura, Richard K, Mann, Lee S, Lindner, Mark D, Braithwaite, Jeremy, Chen, Mei-Ching, Vancea, Adrian, Byrnes, Noni, Durrant, Valerie, Reed, Bruce |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34665132 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71368 |
Ejemplares similares
-
NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Cours de redaction des rapports
por: Georgin, Charles
Publicado: (1960) -
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A l'intention de votre rédaction
por: CERN Press Office. Geneva
Publicado: (1975) -
Redactable and Auditable Data Access for Bioinformatics Research
por: Brown, Jordan, et al.
Publicado: ( 201)