Cargando…
Blinding peer review
Concealing the identity of the principal investigator only partially closes the success gap between white and African American or Black researchers in NIH grant applications.
Autor principal: | Taffe, Michael A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74744 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
por: Nakamura, Richard K, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Associations between epigenetic aging and childhood peer victimization, depression, and suicidal ideation in adolescence and adulthood: A study of two population-based samples
por: Perret, L. C., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Ca(v)1.4 congenital stationary night blindness is associated with an increased rate of proteasomal degradation
por: Sadeh, Tal T., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
por: Parmanne, Piitu, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Osteokines and the vasculature: a review of the in vitro effects of osteocalcin, fibroblast growth factor-23 and lipocalin-2
por: Millar, Sophie A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)