Cargando…

Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While traditional neuropsychological tests are the gold standard in screening for HIV-related cognitive impairment, computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) offer an alternative to these time- and resource-intensive batteries and may prove to be particularly usef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Samuel, Milanini, Benedetta, Javandel, Shireen, Nyamayaro, Primrose, Valcour, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-021-00585-8
_version_ 1784603525745999872
author Wilson, Samuel
Milanini, Benedetta
Javandel, Shireen
Nyamayaro, Primrose
Valcour, Victor
author_facet Wilson, Samuel
Milanini, Benedetta
Javandel, Shireen
Nyamayaro, Primrose
Valcour, Victor
author_sort Wilson, Samuel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While traditional neuropsychological tests are the gold standard in screening for HIV-related cognitive impairment, computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) offer an alternative to these time- and resource-intensive batteries and may prove to be particularly useful for remote assessments or longitudinal monitoring. This review seeks to describe the benefits, limitations, and validity of CNADs in the evaluation of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). RECENT FINDINGS: We identified eight CNADs that have undergone validity testing for cognitive impairment in the setting of HIV. Included among these are batteries that have been modeled after the traditional neuropsychological exam, as well as others that implement new technologies, such as simulated reality and daily ecological assessments in their testing. SUMMARY: Currently, these digital batteries do not yet have the ability to supplant gold standard neuropsychological tests in screening for HAND. However, many have the potential to become effective clinical screening tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8612826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86128262021-11-26 Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review Wilson, Samuel Milanini, Benedetta Javandel, Shireen Nyamayaro, Primrose Valcour, Victor Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Central Nervous System and Cognition (SS Spudich, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While traditional neuropsychological tests are the gold standard in screening for HIV-related cognitive impairment, computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) offer an alternative to these time- and resource-intensive batteries and may prove to be particularly useful for remote assessments or longitudinal monitoring. This review seeks to describe the benefits, limitations, and validity of CNADs in the evaluation of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). RECENT FINDINGS: We identified eight CNADs that have undergone validity testing for cognitive impairment in the setting of HIV. Included among these are batteries that have been modeled after the traditional neuropsychological exam, as well as others that implement new technologies, such as simulated reality and daily ecological assessments in their testing. SUMMARY: Currently, these digital batteries do not yet have the ability to supplant gold standard neuropsychological tests in screening for HAND. However, many have the potential to become effective clinical screening tools. Springer US 2021-11-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8612826/ /pubmed/34820750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-021-00585-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Central Nervous System and Cognition (SS Spudich, Section Editor)
Wilson, Samuel
Milanini, Benedetta
Javandel, Shireen
Nyamayaro, Primrose
Valcour, Victor
Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review
title Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review
title_full Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review
title_fullStr Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review
title_short Validity of Digital Assessments in Screening for HIV-Related Cognitive Impairment: a Review
title_sort validity of digital assessments in screening for hiv-related cognitive impairment: a review
topic Central Nervous System and Cognition (SS Spudich, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-021-00585-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonsamuel validityofdigitalassessmentsinscreeningforhivrelatedcognitiveimpairmentareview
AT milaninibenedetta validityofdigitalassessmentsinscreeningforhivrelatedcognitiveimpairmentareview
AT javandelshireen validityofdigitalassessmentsinscreeningforhivrelatedcognitiveimpairmentareview
AT nyamayaroprimrose validityofdigitalassessmentsinscreeningforhivrelatedcognitiveimpairmentareview
AT valcourvictor validityofdigitalassessmentsinscreeningforhivrelatedcognitiveimpairmentareview