Cargando…
Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie
BACKGROUND: The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report inventory assessing subjective symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia with strong content, construct, discriminant, and predictive validity and test–retest reliability in a range of patient populations. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-021-01000-9 |
_version_ | 1784603563887951872 |
---|---|
author | Bohlender, J. E. Frick, S. Colotto, U. Hotzenköcherle, S. Brockmann-Bauser, M. |
author_facet | Bohlender, J. E. Frick, S. Colotto, U. Hotzenköcherle, S. Brockmann-Bauser, M. |
author_sort | Bohlender, J. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report inventory assessing subjective symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia with strong content, construct, discriminant, and predictive validity and test–retest reliability in a range of patient populations. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this work was to assess the validity and reliability of the German version of the SSQ (SSQ-G). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-validation study, 48 adult German-speaking patients (12 women, 36 men) with neurogenic (n = 16), structural (n = 16), and functional (n = 16) oropharyngeal dysphagia were assessed with the SSQ‑G and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Cronbach’s α was applied to assess the reliability. Criteria and construct validity were investigated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: With Cronbach’s α = 0.94, the internal consistency of the SSQ‑G was excellent. The SSQ‑G questions 1 and 17 showed a moderately significant and highly significant correlation coefficient of −0.43 and −0.45, respectively, with MDADI question 1 (p < 0.5, p < 0.001). Between questions 8, 11, and 12 of the SSQ‑G and questions 7, 13, and 10 of the MDADI, coefficients of −0.48 to −0.55 showed a moderate to strong highly significant correlation (p < 0.001). Thus, the reliability and criterion and construct validity were statistically confirmed. CONCLUSION: The German version of the SSQ (SSQ-G) allows a reliable and valid assessment of functional swallowing difficulties. In combination with questionnaires on symptom-specific quality of life, such as the MDADI, a more differentiated clinical analysis of swallowing problems is thus possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8613080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86130802021-12-10 Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie Bohlender, J. E. Frick, S. Colotto, U. Hotzenköcherle, S. Brockmann-Bauser, M. HNO Originalien BACKGROUND: The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report inventory assessing subjective symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia with strong content, construct, discriminant, and predictive validity and test–retest reliability in a range of patient populations. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this work was to assess the validity and reliability of the German version of the SSQ (SSQ-G). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-validation study, 48 adult German-speaking patients (12 women, 36 men) with neurogenic (n = 16), structural (n = 16), and functional (n = 16) oropharyngeal dysphagia were assessed with the SSQ‑G and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Cronbach’s α was applied to assess the reliability. Criteria and construct validity were investigated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: With Cronbach’s α = 0.94, the internal consistency of the SSQ‑G was excellent. The SSQ‑G questions 1 and 17 showed a moderately significant and highly significant correlation coefficient of −0.43 and −0.45, respectively, with MDADI question 1 (p < 0.5, p < 0.001). Between questions 8, 11, and 12 of the SSQ‑G and questions 7, 13, and 10 of the MDADI, coefficients of −0.48 to −0.55 showed a moderate to strong highly significant correlation (p < 0.001). Thus, the reliability and criterion and construct validity were statistically confirmed. CONCLUSION: The German version of the SSQ (SSQ-G) allows a reliable and valid assessment of functional swallowing difficulties. In combination with questionnaires on symptom-specific quality of life, such as the MDADI, a more differentiated clinical analysis of swallowing problems is thus possible. Springer Medizin 2021-02-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8613080/ /pubmed/33608794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-021-01000-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Bohlender, J. E. Frick, S. Colotto, U. Hotzenköcherle, S. Brockmann-Bauser, M. Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie |
title | Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie |
title_full | Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie |
title_fullStr | Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie |
title_full_unstemmed | Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie |
title_short | Der deutsche Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Reliabilität und Validität bei Patienten mit oropharyngealer Dysphagie |
title_sort | der deutsche sydney swallow questionnaire: reliabilität und validität bei patienten mit oropharyngealer dysphagie |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-021-01000-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bohlenderje derdeutschesydneyswallowquestionnairereliabilitatundvaliditatbeipatientenmitoropharyngealerdysphagie AT fricks derdeutschesydneyswallowquestionnairereliabilitatundvaliditatbeipatientenmitoropharyngealerdysphagie AT colottou derdeutschesydneyswallowquestionnairereliabilitatundvaliditatbeipatientenmitoropharyngealerdysphagie AT hotzenkocherles derdeutschesydneyswallowquestionnairereliabilitatundvaliditatbeipatientenmitoropharyngealerdysphagie AT brockmannbauserm derdeutschesydneyswallowquestionnairereliabilitatundvaliditatbeipatientenmitoropharyngealerdysphagie |