Cargando…

Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors

Chemical cues play important roles in predator–prey interactions. Semiochemicals can aid predator foraging and alert prey organisms to the presence of predators. Previous work suggests that predator traits differentially influence prey behavior, however, empirical data on how prey organisms respond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grunseich, John M., Aguirre, Natalie M., Thompson, Morgan N., Ali, Jared G., Helms, Anjel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34415500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8
_version_ 1784603576165728256
author Grunseich, John M.
Aguirre, Natalie M.
Thompson, Morgan N.
Ali, Jared G.
Helms, Anjel M.
author_facet Grunseich, John M.
Aguirre, Natalie M.
Thompson, Morgan N.
Ali, Jared G.
Helms, Anjel M.
author_sort Grunseich, John M.
collection PubMed
description Chemical cues play important roles in predator–prey interactions. Semiochemicals can aid predator foraging and alert prey organisms to the presence of predators. Previous work suggests that predator traits differentially influence prey behavior, however, empirical data on how prey organisms respond to chemical cues from predator species with different hunting strategies, and how foraging predators react to cues from potential competitors, is lacking. Furthermore, most research in this area has focused on aquatic and aboveground terrestrial systems, while interactions among belowground, soiling-dwelling organisms have received relatively little attention. Here, we assessed how chemical cues from three species of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), each with a different foraging strategy, influenced herbivore (cucumber beetle) and natural enemy (EPN) foraging behavior. We predicted these cues could serve as chemical indicators of increased predation risk, prey availability, or competition. Our findings revealed that foraging cucumber beetle larvae avoided chemical cues from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (active-foraging cruiser EPNs), but not Steinernema carpocapsae (ambusher EPNs) or Steinernema riobrave (intermediate-foraging EPNs). In contrast, foraging H. bacteriophora EPNs were attracted to cues produced by the two Steinernema species but not conspecific cues. Notably, the three EPN species produced distinct blends of olfactory cues, with only a few semi-conserved compounds across species. These results indicate that a belowground insect herbivore responds differently to chemical cues from different EPN species, with some EPN species avoiding prey detection. Moreover, the active-hunting EPNs were attracted to heterospecific cues, suggesting these cues indicate a greater probability of available prey, rather than strong interspecific competition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8613145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86131452021-12-10 Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors Grunseich, John M. Aguirre, Natalie M. Thompson, Morgan N. Ali, Jared G. Helms, Anjel M. J Chem Ecol Article Chemical cues play important roles in predator–prey interactions. Semiochemicals can aid predator foraging and alert prey organisms to the presence of predators. Previous work suggests that predator traits differentially influence prey behavior, however, empirical data on how prey organisms respond to chemical cues from predator species with different hunting strategies, and how foraging predators react to cues from potential competitors, is lacking. Furthermore, most research in this area has focused on aquatic and aboveground terrestrial systems, while interactions among belowground, soiling-dwelling organisms have received relatively little attention. Here, we assessed how chemical cues from three species of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), each with a different foraging strategy, influenced herbivore (cucumber beetle) and natural enemy (EPN) foraging behavior. We predicted these cues could serve as chemical indicators of increased predation risk, prey availability, or competition. Our findings revealed that foraging cucumber beetle larvae avoided chemical cues from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (active-foraging cruiser EPNs), but not Steinernema carpocapsae (ambusher EPNs) or Steinernema riobrave (intermediate-foraging EPNs). In contrast, foraging H. bacteriophora EPNs were attracted to cues produced by the two Steinernema species but not conspecific cues. Notably, the three EPN species produced distinct blends of olfactory cues, with only a few semi-conserved compounds across species. These results indicate that a belowground insect herbivore responds differently to chemical cues from different EPN species, with some EPN species avoiding prey detection. Moreover, the active-hunting EPNs were attracted to heterospecific cues, suggesting these cues indicate a greater probability of available prey, rather than strong interspecific competition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8. Springer US 2021-08-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8613145/ /pubmed/34415500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Grunseich, John M.
Aguirre, Natalie M.
Thompson, Morgan N.
Ali, Jared G.
Helms, Anjel M.
Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
title Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
title_full Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
title_fullStr Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
title_full_unstemmed Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
title_short Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
title_sort chemical cues from entomopathogenic nematodes vary across three species with different foraging strategies, triggering different behavioral responses in prey and competitors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34415500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8
work_keys_str_mv AT grunseichjohnm chemicalcuesfromentomopathogenicnematodesvaryacrossthreespecieswithdifferentforagingstrategiestriggeringdifferentbehavioralresponsesinpreyandcompetitors
AT aguirrenataliem chemicalcuesfromentomopathogenicnematodesvaryacrossthreespecieswithdifferentforagingstrategiestriggeringdifferentbehavioralresponsesinpreyandcompetitors
AT thompsonmorgann chemicalcuesfromentomopathogenicnematodesvaryacrossthreespecieswithdifferentforagingstrategiestriggeringdifferentbehavioralresponsesinpreyandcompetitors
AT alijaredg chemicalcuesfromentomopathogenicnematodesvaryacrossthreespecieswithdifferentforagingstrategiestriggeringdifferentbehavioralresponsesinpreyandcompetitors
AT helmsanjelm chemicalcuesfromentomopathogenicnematodesvaryacrossthreespecieswithdifferentforagingstrategiestriggeringdifferentbehavioralresponsesinpreyandcompetitors