Cargando…

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up

Analyzing outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is of increased interest in the orthopaedic literature. The purposes of this study were to report outcomes after ACLR at medium to long-term follow-up, identify the thresh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nwachukwu, Benedict U., Sullivan, Spencer W., Rauck, Ryan C., James, Evan W., Burger, Joost A., Altchek, David W., Allen, Answorth A., Williams, Riley J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00056
_version_ 1784603622748717056
author Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Sullivan, Spencer W.
Rauck, Ryan C.
James, Evan W.
Burger, Joost A.
Altchek, David W.
Allen, Answorth A.
Williams, Riley J.
author_facet Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Sullivan, Spencer W.
Rauck, Ryan C.
James, Evan W.
Burger, Joost A.
Altchek, David W.
Allen, Answorth A.
Williams, Riley J.
author_sort Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
collection PubMed
description Analyzing outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is of increased interest in the orthopaedic literature. The purposes of this study were to report outcomes after ACLR at medium to long-term follow-up, identify the threshold preoperative outcome values that would be predictive of achieving the MCID postoperatively, and analyze outcome maintenance at medium to long-term follow-up after ACLR. METHODS: Active athletes who underwent ACLR were identified in an institutional ACL registry. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered preoperatively and at the 2-year and >5-year postoperative follow-up; measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and Lysholm scale. We calculated the MCID from baseline to each of the 2 follow-up periods (2-year and mean 7.7-year). Logistic regression was performed to investigate factors associated with achievement of the MCID. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (mean follow-up, 7.7 years [range, 6.6 to 9.1 years]) underwent ACLR. The mean age and body mass index at the time of surgery were 27.2 ± 13.0 years and 23.2 ± 3.0 kg/m(2), respectively. Final postoperative outcome scores improved significantly from baseline for the IKDC (50.9 ± 14.7 to 87.9 ± 11.2), SF-12 PCS (41.6 ± 8.9 to 55.6 ± 3.2), and Lysholm scale (62.2 ± 17.6 to 90.5 ± 10.3) (p < 0.0001), while the SF-12 MCS did not improve significantly (54.2 ± 8.0 to 54.4 ± 6.0) (p = 0.763). Between 2- and >5-year follow-up, the SF-12 PCS showed significant improvement (54.6 ± 4.5 to 55.6 ± 3.2; p = 0.036), while no change was noted in the IKDC (87.6 ± 11.1 to 87.9 ± 11.2), SF-12 MCS (55.5 ± 5.3 to 54.4 ± 6.0), and Lysholm scale (89.8 ± 10.6 to 90.5 ± 10.3) (p ≥ 0.09). At the time of final follow-up, the MCID was achieved by 94.7% of patients for the IKDC, 80.8% for the Lysholm, 79.0% for the SF-12 PCS, and 28.2% for the SF-12 MCS. At 2-year follow-up, 95.3% of patients were either “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with their surgery, compared with 88.6% at the time of final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high level of maintained function following ACLR. The IKDC, SF-12 PCS, and Lysholm scores improved significantly after ACLR at the time of final follow-up and were not significantly different between follow-up periods. Approximately 95% and 89% of patients reported being satisfied with the outcome of surgery at the 2-year and final follow-up, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8613365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86133652021-11-26 Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up Nwachukwu, Benedict U. Sullivan, Spencer W. Rauck, Ryan C. James, Evan W. Burger, Joost A. Altchek, David W. Allen, Answorth A. Williams, Riley J. JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles Analyzing outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is of increased interest in the orthopaedic literature. The purposes of this study were to report outcomes after ACLR at medium to long-term follow-up, identify the threshold preoperative outcome values that would be predictive of achieving the MCID postoperatively, and analyze outcome maintenance at medium to long-term follow-up after ACLR. METHODS: Active athletes who underwent ACLR were identified in an institutional ACL registry. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered preoperatively and at the 2-year and >5-year postoperative follow-up; measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and Lysholm scale. We calculated the MCID from baseline to each of the 2 follow-up periods (2-year and mean 7.7-year). Logistic regression was performed to investigate factors associated with achievement of the MCID. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (mean follow-up, 7.7 years [range, 6.6 to 9.1 years]) underwent ACLR. The mean age and body mass index at the time of surgery were 27.2 ± 13.0 years and 23.2 ± 3.0 kg/m(2), respectively. Final postoperative outcome scores improved significantly from baseline for the IKDC (50.9 ± 14.7 to 87.9 ± 11.2), SF-12 PCS (41.6 ± 8.9 to 55.6 ± 3.2), and Lysholm scale (62.2 ± 17.6 to 90.5 ± 10.3) (p < 0.0001), while the SF-12 MCS did not improve significantly (54.2 ± 8.0 to 54.4 ± 6.0) (p = 0.763). Between 2- and >5-year follow-up, the SF-12 PCS showed significant improvement (54.6 ± 4.5 to 55.6 ± 3.2; p = 0.036), while no change was noted in the IKDC (87.6 ± 11.1 to 87.9 ± 11.2), SF-12 MCS (55.5 ± 5.3 to 54.4 ± 6.0), and Lysholm scale (89.8 ± 10.6 to 90.5 ± 10.3) (p ≥ 0.09). At the time of final follow-up, the MCID was achieved by 94.7% of patients for the IKDC, 80.8% for the Lysholm, 79.0% for the SF-12 PCS, and 28.2% for the SF-12 MCS. At 2-year follow-up, 95.3% of patients were either “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with their surgery, compared with 88.6% at the time of final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high level of maintained function following ACLR. The IKDC, SF-12 PCS, and Lysholm scores improved significantly after ACLR at the time of final follow-up and were not significantly different between follow-up periods. Approximately 95% and 89% of patients reported being satisfied with the outcome of surgery at the 2-year and final follow-up, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8613365/ /pubmed/34841188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00056 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Sullivan, Spencer W.
Rauck, Ryan C.
James, Evan W.
Burger, Joost A.
Altchek, David W.
Allen, Answorth A.
Williams, Riley J.
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up
title Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up
title_full Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up
title_short Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up
title_sort patient-reported outcomes and factors associated with achieving the minimal clinically important difference after acl reconstruction: results at a mean 7.7-year follow-up
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT nwachukwubenedictu patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT sullivanspencerw patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT rauckryanc patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT jamesevanw patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT burgerjoosta patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT altchekdavidw patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT allenanswortha patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup
AT williamsrileyj patientreportedoutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteraclreconstructionresultsatamean77yearfollowup