Cargando…

Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts (Epifix) as an adjunct to standard care, compared with standard care alone, to manage non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in secondary care in the United Kingdom, fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guest, Julian F., Atkin, Leanne, Aitkins, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13591
_version_ 1784603628837797888
author Guest, Julian F.
Atkin, Leanne
Aitkins, Christopher
author_facet Guest, Julian F.
Atkin, Leanne
Aitkins, Christopher
author_sort Guest, Julian F.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts (Epifix) as an adjunct to standard care, compared with standard care alone, to manage non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in secondary care in the United Kingdom, from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS). A Markov model was constructed to simulate the management of diabetic lower extremity ulcers over a period of 1 year. The model was used to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dHACM, compared with standard care alone, to treat non‐healing DFUs in the United Kingdom, in terms of the incremental cost per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 2019/2020 prices. The study estimated that at 12 months after the start of treatment, use of adjunctive dHACM instead of standard care alone is expected to lead to a 90% increase in the probability of healing, a 34% reduction in the probability of wound infection, a 57% reduction in the probability of wound recurrence, a 6% increase in the probability of avoiding an amputation, and 8% improvement in the number of QALYs. Additionally, if £4062 is spent on dHACM allografts per ulcer, then adjunctive use of dHACM instead of standard care alone is expected to lead to an incremental cost per QALY gain of £20 000. However, if the amount spent on dHACM allografts was ≤£3250 per ulcer, the 12‐month cost of managing an ulcer treated with adjunctive dHACM would break‐even with that of DFUs treated with standard care, and it would have a 0.95 probability of being cost‐effective at the £20 000 per QALY threshold. In conclusion, within the study's limitations, and within a certain price range, adjunctive dHACM allografts afford the NHS a cost‐effective intervention for the treatment of non‐healing DFUs within secondary care among adult patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8613389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86133892021-11-30 Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom Guest, Julian F. Atkin, Leanne Aitkins, Christopher Int Wound J Original Articles The aim of this study was to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts (Epifix) as an adjunct to standard care, compared with standard care alone, to manage non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in secondary care in the United Kingdom, from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS). A Markov model was constructed to simulate the management of diabetic lower extremity ulcers over a period of 1 year. The model was used to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dHACM, compared with standard care alone, to treat non‐healing DFUs in the United Kingdom, in terms of the incremental cost per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 2019/2020 prices. The study estimated that at 12 months after the start of treatment, use of adjunctive dHACM instead of standard care alone is expected to lead to a 90% increase in the probability of healing, a 34% reduction in the probability of wound infection, a 57% reduction in the probability of wound recurrence, a 6% increase in the probability of avoiding an amputation, and 8% improvement in the number of QALYs. Additionally, if £4062 is spent on dHACM allografts per ulcer, then adjunctive use of dHACM instead of standard care alone is expected to lead to an incremental cost per QALY gain of £20 000. However, if the amount spent on dHACM allografts was ≤£3250 per ulcer, the 12‐month cost of managing an ulcer treated with adjunctive dHACM would break‐even with that of DFUs treated with standard care, and it would have a 0.95 probability of being cost‐effective at the £20 000 per QALY threshold. In conclusion, within the study's limitations, and within a certain price range, adjunctive dHACM allografts afford the NHS a cost‐effective intervention for the treatment of non‐healing DFUs within secondary care among adult patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8613389/ /pubmed/33827144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13591 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guest, Julian F.
Atkin, Leanne
Aitkins, Christopher
Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
title Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
title_full Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
title_short Potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
title_sort potential cost‐effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers in the united kingdom
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13591
work_keys_str_mv AT guestjulianf potentialcosteffectivenessofusingadjunctivedehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftinthemanagementofnonhealingdiabeticfootulcersintheunitedkingdom
AT atkinleanne potentialcosteffectivenessofusingadjunctivedehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftinthemanagementofnonhealingdiabeticfootulcersintheunitedkingdom
AT aitkinschristopher potentialcosteffectivenessofusingadjunctivedehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftinthemanagementofnonhealingdiabeticfootulcersintheunitedkingdom