Cargando…

Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses

BACKGROUND: Electrical auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging therapy. Stimuli are transported to brainstem nuclei, whereby its multiple projections reach to many subcortical and cortical areas, thus allowing the neuromodulation of several systemic physiological processes. We aim t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Gurtubay, Iñaki Garcia, Bermejo, Pedro, Lopez, Miguel, Larraya, Iñaki, Librero, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2343
_version_ 1784603633441046528
author de Gurtubay, Iñaki Garcia
Bermejo, Pedro
Lopez, Miguel
Larraya, Iñaki
Librero, Julian
author_facet de Gurtubay, Iñaki Garcia
Bermejo, Pedro
Lopez, Miguel
Larraya, Iñaki
Librero, Julian
author_sort de Gurtubay, Iñaki Garcia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electrical auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging therapy. Stimuli are transported to brainstem nuclei, whereby its multiple projections reach to many subcortical and cortical areas, thus allowing the neuromodulation of several systemic physiological processes. We aim to define the best auricular target for taVNS through vagus somatosensory evoked potential (VSEP) elicited stimulating different auricular areas with different electrode sizes. METHODS: Twenty‐six subjects were enrolled. Three stimulation areas were studied: simultaneous cymba and cavum (CC), cymba (C) and earlobe (L); and two electrode sizes: extra‐large (X) and small (S). We studied the effect of five combinations (CCX, CCS, CS, LX and LS) on VSEP´s latency and amplitude, and sensory and pain threshold (Pt) using a lineal mixed model regression analysis. We used CS combination, used in a commercial device, as reference model. RESULTS: Valid VSEP were obtained for CCX, CCS and CS but not in LX and LS. Both CCS and CCX tests showed significant amplitude increases. The same effect was observed in CCX using CCS as reference. Significant increases in Pt were found for CCX and LX. The same effect was observed in CCX using LX as reference. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that CC and C areas are active targets for taVNS but not for earlobe, as anatomical data support. Considering that amplitude reflects the synchronized electrical activity generated, we conclude the most effective topography is the simultaneous stimulation of cymba and concha. The use of X‐sized electrodes increases the amplitudes and makes the stimulation more comfortable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8613407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86134072021-11-30 Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses de Gurtubay, Iñaki Garcia Bermejo, Pedro Lopez, Miguel Larraya, Iñaki Librero, Julian Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: Electrical auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging therapy. Stimuli are transported to brainstem nuclei, whereby its multiple projections reach to many subcortical and cortical areas, thus allowing the neuromodulation of several systemic physiological processes. We aim to define the best auricular target for taVNS through vagus somatosensory evoked potential (VSEP) elicited stimulating different auricular areas with different electrode sizes. METHODS: Twenty‐six subjects were enrolled. Three stimulation areas were studied: simultaneous cymba and cavum (CC), cymba (C) and earlobe (L); and two electrode sizes: extra‐large (X) and small (S). We studied the effect of five combinations (CCX, CCS, CS, LX and LS) on VSEP´s latency and amplitude, and sensory and pain threshold (Pt) using a lineal mixed model regression analysis. We used CS combination, used in a commercial device, as reference model. RESULTS: Valid VSEP were obtained for CCX, CCS and CS but not in LX and LS. Both CCS and CCX tests showed significant amplitude increases. The same effect was observed in CCX using CCS as reference. Significant increases in Pt were found for CCX and LX. The same effect was observed in CCX using LX as reference. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that CC and C areas are active targets for taVNS but not for earlobe, as anatomical data support. Considering that amplitude reflects the synchronized electrical activity generated, we conclude the most effective topography is the simultaneous stimulation of cymba and concha. The use of X‐sized electrodes increases the amplitudes and makes the stimulation more comfortable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8613407/ /pubmed/34551214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2343 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Gurtubay, Iñaki Garcia
Bermejo, Pedro
Lopez, Miguel
Larraya, Iñaki
Librero, Julian
Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
title Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
title_full Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
title_fullStr Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
title_short Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
title_sort evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2343
work_keys_str_mv AT degurtubayinakigarcia evaluationofdifferentvagusnervestimulationanatomicaltargetsintheearbyvagusevokedpotentialresponses
AT bermejopedro evaluationofdifferentvagusnervestimulationanatomicaltargetsintheearbyvagusevokedpotentialresponses
AT lopezmiguel evaluationofdifferentvagusnervestimulationanatomicaltargetsintheearbyvagusevokedpotentialresponses
AT larrayainaki evaluationofdifferentvagusnervestimulationanatomicaltargetsintheearbyvagusevokedpotentialresponses
AT librerojulian evaluationofdifferentvagusnervestimulationanatomicaltargetsintheearbyvagusevokedpotentialresponses