Cargando…
Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the objective optical properties of 2 enhanced depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical bench analysis. METHODS: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519139 |
_version_ | 1784603673483018240 |
---|---|
author | Borkenstein, Andreas F. Borkenstein, Eva-Maria Luedtke, Holger Schmid, Ruediger |
author_facet | Borkenstein, Andreas F. Borkenstein, Eva-Maria Luedtke, Holger Schmid, Ruediger |
author_sort | Borkenstein, Andreas F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the objective optical properties of 2 enhanced depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical bench analysis. METHODS: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart Crystal, on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea. IOLs (power 22.0 D) were evaluated regarding modulation transfer function (MTF) at 50 lp/mm and Strehl ratio (SR) using a 3.0-mm and a 4.5-mm aperture. In addition, wavefront measurements were obtained using WaveMaster® IOL 2 device (Trioptics, Germany), and USAF targets were analyzed. RESULTS: Centered: the MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AcrySof IQ Vivity/LuxSmart Crystal) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.250/0.257 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.202/0.243. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.261/0.355 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.176/0.206. Decentered by 1 mm: the MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AcrySof IQ Vivity/LuxSmart Crystal) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.266/0.247 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.126/0.215. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.272/0.234 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.133/0.183. Tilted by 5 degree: the MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AcrySof IQ Vivity/LuxSmart Crystal) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.221/0.360 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.214/0.229. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.232/0.428 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.225/0.229. The simulated visual function using USAF test targets showed corresponding qualitative results. Wavefront measurements proved a complex optical design. Higher order aberrations in the central part of the optics were modulated up to the 10th order to enhance the range of functional vision to near distance, leaving the peripheral parts of the optics aberration free or as aberration correcting. CONCLUSION: The diversity of EDOF IOLs, their optics, and their respective impact on the vision quality must be understood in order to select the appropriate IOL in each individual case. This analysis of new, innovative IOL optics based on increased negative spherical aberration may help the ophthalmic surgeon to select the IOL which meets the individual requirements of the patient for best postoperative outcomes. It seems that there is no perfect IOL that is equally suitable for all patients, but the right choice is an individual, customized approach dealing with patients' expectations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8613612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86136122021-12-22 Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses Borkenstein, Andreas F. Borkenstein, Eva-Maria Luedtke, Holger Schmid, Ruediger Biomed Hub Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the objective optical properties of 2 enhanced depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical bench analysis. METHODS: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart Crystal, on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea. IOLs (power 22.0 D) were evaluated regarding modulation transfer function (MTF) at 50 lp/mm and Strehl ratio (SR) using a 3.0-mm and a 4.5-mm aperture. In addition, wavefront measurements were obtained using WaveMaster® IOL 2 device (Trioptics, Germany), and USAF targets were analyzed. RESULTS: Centered: the MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AcrySof IQ Vivity/LuxSmart Crystal) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.250/0.257 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.202/0.243. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.261/0.355 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.176/0.206. Decentered by 1 mm: the MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AcrySof IQ Vivity/LuxSmart Crystal) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.266/0.247 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.126/0.215. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.272/0.234 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.133/0.183. Tilted by 5 degree: the MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AcrySof IQ Vivity/LuxSmart Crystal) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.221/0.360 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.214/0.229. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.232/0.428 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.225/0.229. The simulated visual function using USAF test targets showed corresponding qualitative results. Wavefront measurements proved a complex optical design. Higher order aberrations in the central part of the optics were modulated up to the 10th order to enhance the range of functional vision to near distance, leaving the peripheral parts of the optics aberration free or as aberration correcting. CONCLUSION: The diversity of EDOF IOLs, their optics, and their respective impact on the vision quality must be understood in order to select the appropriate IOL in each individual case. This analysis of new, innovative IOL optics based on increased negative spherical aberration may help the ophthalmic surgeon to select the IOL which meets the individual requirements of the patient for best postoperative outcomes. It seems that there is no perfect IOL that is equally suitable for all patients, but the right choice is an individual, customized approach dealing with patients' expectations. S. Karger AG 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8613612/ /pubmed/34950668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519139 Text en Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Borkenstein, Andreas F. Borkenstein, Eva-Maria Luedtke, Holger Schmid, Ruediger Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses |
title | Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses |
title_full | Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses |
title_fullStr | Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses |
title_short | Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses |
title_sort | optical bench analysis of 2 depth of focus intraocular lenses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borkensteinandreasf opticalbenchanalysisof2depthoffocusintraocularlenses AT borkensteinevamaria opticalbenchanalysisof2depthoffocusintraocularlenses AT luedtkeholger opticalbenchanalysisof2depthoffocusintraocularlenses AT schmidruediger opticalbenchanalysisof2depthoffocusintraocularlenses |