Cargando…
Discordant and inappropriate discordant recommendations in consensus and evidence based guidelines: empirical analysis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether alignment of strength of recommendations with quality of evidence differs in consensus based versus evidence based guidelines. DESIGN: Empirical analysis. DATA SOURCE: Guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC...
Autores principales: | Yao, Liang, Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb, Guyatt, Gordon H, Yan, Peijing, Hui, Xu, Wang, Qi, Yang, Kehu, Tian, Jinhui, Djulbegovic, Benjamin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-066045 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impact of quality of evidence on the strength of recommendations: an empirical study
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Challenges and controversies of complex interventions in osteoarthritis management: recognizing inappropriate and discordant care
por: Dziedzic, Krysia S, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Discord for dummies
por: Morris, Tee
Publicado: (2020) -
Low prevalence of relevant findings in inappropriate echocardiograms
and discordant perceptions between cardiologists and patients
por: Lopes, J.R., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evidence-based medicine in times of crisis
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)