Electrochemical Investigation and Molecular Docking Techniques on the Interaction of Acridinedione Dyes with Water-Soluble Nonfluorophoric Simple Amino Acids

[Image: see text] Electrochemical studies of resorcinol-based acridinedione (AD) dyes with nonfluorophoric simple amino acids, glycine, alanine, and valine, were carried out in water. AD probes are classified into photoinduced electron transfer (PET) and non-PET-based dyes, wherein the electrochemical properties and photophysical and photochemical behavior vary significantly based on the nature of substituent groups and the nature of the solute. The oxidation potential of PET dye (ADR1) to that of non-PET-based dye (ADR2) differs significantly such that the addition of amino acids results in a shift of the oxidation peak to a less positive potential and the reduction peak to a lesser negative potential. The extent of shift of oxidation and reduction potential in PET dye is more pronounced than that of non-PET dye on the addition of valine rather than glycine. The variation in the shift is attributed to the presence of an electron-donating moiety (OCH(3)) group in the ninth position of ADR1 dye. Consequently, the quenching of fluorescence is observed in ADR2 with non fluorophoric amino acids that are authenticated by the shift of the anodic and cathodic peaks toward a lesser positive potential. Molecular docking (MD) studies of PET and non-PET dye with amino acids portray that neither hydrophobic interactions nor electrostatic or weak interactions such as van der Waals and pi–pi interactions govern the electrochemical nature of dye on the addition of amino acids. Furthermore, the formation of a conventional hydrogen bond between dye and amino acid is established from MD studies. The existence of dye–water–amino acid competitive hydrogen-bonding interactions is presumably well-oriented throughout the aqueous phase as observed through photophysical studies which support our electrochemical investigation.