Cargando…

Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows

BACKGROUND: In commercial pig farming, sick or injured sows are often treated by producers or hired staff. To date, limited quantitative data exists on treatment compliance and the possible effect on sow longevity post-treatment. The objective of the study was to quantify on-farm compliance of treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campler, Magnus R., Cox, Jeremiah L., Walker, Heather L., Arruda, Andréia G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00238-7
_version_ 1784603752788918272
author Campler, Magnus R.
Cox, Jeremiah L.
Walker, Heather L.
Arruda, Andréia G.
author_facet Campler, Magnus R.
Cox, Jeremiah L.
Walker, Heather L.
Arruda, Andréia G.
author_sort Campler, Magnus R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In commercial pig farming, sick or injured sows are often treated by producers or hired staff. To date, limited quantitative data exists on treatment compliance and the possible effect on sow longevity post-treatment. The objective of the study was to quantify on-farm compliance of treatment selection, frequency, and dosage, as well as to investigate the association between body condition scores (BCS) and other sow-level factors on post-treatment cull risk. RESULTS: On-farm treatment records, including culling reason or reason of death up to 6 months post-treatment, production records and sow characteristics were obtained for 134 sows over an 8-week period. Treatment compliance was based on the accuracy of recorded treatments compared to the herd veterinarian’s established treatment guidelines. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models including treatment reason, treatment compliance, BCS, parity, production stage and production metrics, were constructed to investigate associations between those variables and sow culling or death. This study found low compliance for on-farm sow treatment protocols, with only 22.4% (30/134) of the sows receiving correct and complete treatment during the duration of the study. No effect of individual treatment components (drug, dosage, or frequency) on sow culling was observed. A trend for an interaction between treatment compliance and BCS was found, and parity and number of piglets born alive were identified as predictors for sow maintenance in the herd. CONCLUSIONS: On-farm sow treatment compliance was low, resulting in that approximately 80% of the enrolled sows were not treated according to existing guidelines. Non-compliance of treatment guidelines did not seem to affect the risk of culling in treated sows but may have prolonged any associated pain, recovery time and negatively impacted the sow welfare during that time period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8613945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86139452021-11-29 Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows Campler, Magnus R. Cox, Jeremiah L. Walker, Heather L. Arruda, Andréia G. Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: In commercial pig farming, sick or injured sows are often treated by producers or hired staff. To date, limited quantitative data exists on treatment compliance and the possible effect on sow longevity post-treatment. The objective of the study was to quantify on-farm compliance of treatment selection, frequency, and dosage, as well as to investigate the association between body condition scores (BCS) and other sow-level factors on post-treatment cull risk. RESULTS: On-farm treatment records, including culling reason or reason of death up to 6 months post-treatment, production records and sow characteristics were obtained for 134 sows over an 8-week period. Treatment compliance was based on the accuracy of recorded treatments compared to the herd veterinarian’s established treatment guidelines. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models including treatment reason, treatment compliance, BCS, parity, production stage and production metrics, were constructed to investigate associations between those variables and sow culling or death. This study found low compliance for on-farm sow treatment protocols, with only 22.4% (30/134) of the sows receiving correct and complete treatment during the duration of the study. No effect of individual treatment components (drug, dosage, or frequency) on sow culling was observed. A trend for an interaction between treatment compliance and BCS was found, and parity and number of piglets born alive were identified as predictors for sow maintenance in the herd. CONCLUSIONS: On-farm sow treatment compliance was low, resulting in that approximately 80% of the enrolled sows were not treated according to existing guidelines. Non-compliance of treatment guidelines did not seem to affect the risk of culling in treated sows but may have prolonged any associated pain, recovery time and negatively impacted the sow welfare during that time period. BioMed Central 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8613945/ /pubmed/34823594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00238-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Campler, Magnus R.
Cox, Jeremiah L.
Walker, Heather L.
Arruda, Andréia G.
Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
title Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
title_full Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
title_fullStr Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
title_full_unstemmed Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
title_short Description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
title_sort description of on-farm treatment compliance and risk factors for culling in sows
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00238-7
work_keys_str_mv AT camplermagnusr descriptionofonfarmtreatmentcomplianceandriskfactorsforcullinginsows
AT coxjeremiahl descriptionofonfarmtreatmentcomplianceandriskfactorsforcullinginsows
AT walkerheatherl descriptionofonfarmtreatmentcomplianceandriskfactorsforcullinginsows
AT arrudaandreiag descriptionofonfarmtreatmentcomplianceandriskfactorsforcullinginsows