Cargando…
Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty?
BACKGROUND: The “cup-in-cup” technique allows for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) when the cementless cup is well fixed. Furthermore, it can be used for liner wear or mechanical failure where liner replacement may be impossible or impractical. Recently, the “cup-in-cup” technique in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04835-z |
_version_ | 1784603754714103808 |
---|---|
author | Bellova, Petri Koch, Fiona Stiehler, Maik Hartmann, Albrecht Fritzsche, Hagen Günther, Klaus-Peter Goronzy, Jens |
author_facet | Bellova, Petri Koch, Fiona Stiehler, Maik Hartmann, Albrecht Fritzsche, Hagen Günther, Klaus-Peter Goronzy, Jens |
author_sort | Bellova, Petri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The “cup-in-cup” technique allows for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) when the cementless cup is well fixed. Furthermore, it can be used for liner wear or mechanical failure where liner replacement may be impossible or impractical. Recently, the “cup-in-cup” technique in combination with dual mobility cups (DMC) has drawn increased attention. Our aim was to report on the clinical and radiographic outcomes following this surgery. METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 33 patients treated with the DMC- “cup in cup” technique were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients had died while 19 were available for the final follow-up (FU), of which 15 underwent both a radiograph and a FU visit, 2 underwent a radiograph only and 2 underwent a telephone interview only. Patient-related outcome measures included the HHS and the WOMAC. Radiographs were assessed for implant loosening and positioning. Primary endpoint was revision of any cause and secondary endpoint was loosening of the DMC at the latest FU. The survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 78.6 ± 7.1 (63–93) years and the mean surgery duration was 124.4 ± 52.0 (60–245) minutes. Recurrent dislocation (42.4%), periprosthetic fracture (39.4%) and polyethylene wear (6.1%) were the most frequent reasons for surgery. The mean FU duration (n = 19) was 28.5 ± 17.3 (3–64) months. The mean HHS score at FU was 59.4 ± 22.2 (29–91) and the mean WOMAC score was 59.7 ± 25.6 (15.6–93.8). Two cups were revised due to instability and one revision was performed due to periprosthetic joint infection, accounting for an overall cup survival rate of 86.8% after a mean FU of 22.9 ± 18.0 (1.5–64.6) months. The survival rate free of loosening was 90.9% after a mean FU of 22.3 ± 18.5 (1.5–64.7) months. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the cementation of a DMC in a well-fixed cup is a promising short- to mid-term treatment addressing THA instability especially in elderly and frail patients, who benefit from a reduced operation time. Proper cementation technique, adequate cup positioning as well as selection of a sufficiently large DMC are crucial for treatment success. Longer FUs will be needed in the future in order to further prove the benefit of this technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8613958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86139582021-11-29 Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? Bellova, Petri Koch, Fiona Stiehler, Maik Hartmann, Albrecht Fritzsche, Hagen Günther, Klaus-Peter Goronzy, Jens BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The “cup-in-cup” technique allows for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) when the cementless cup is well fixed. Furthermore, it can be used for liner wear or mechanical failure where liner replacement may be impossible or impractical. Recently, the “cup-in-cup” technique in combination with dual mobility cups (DMC) has drawn increased attention. Our aim was to report on the clinical and radiographic outcomes following this surgery. METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 33 patients treated with the DMC- “cup in cup” technique were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients had died while 19 were available for the final follow-up (FU), of which 15 underwent both a radiograph and a FU visit, 2 underwent a radiograph only and 2 underwent a telephone interview only. Patient-related outcome measures included the HHS and the WOMAC. Radiographs were assessed for implant loosening and positioning. Primary endpoint was revision of any cause and secondary endpoint was loosening of the DMC at the latest FU. The survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 78.6 ± 7.1 (63–93) years and the mean surgery duration was 124.4 ± 52.0 (60–245) minutes. Recurrent dislocation (42.4%), periprosthetic fracture (39.4%) and polyethylene wear (6.1%) were the most frequent reasons for surgery. The mean FU duration (n = 19) was 28.5 ± 17.3 (3–64) months. The mean HHS score at FU was 59.4 ± 22.2 (29–91) and the mean WOMAC score was 59.7 ± 25.6 (15.6–93.8). Two cups were revised due to instability and one revision was performed due to periprosthetic joint infection, accounting for an overall cup survival rate of 86.8% after a mean FU of 22.9 ± 18.0 (1.5–64.6) months. The survival rate free of loosening was 90.9% after a mean FU of 22.3 ± 18.5 (1.5–64.7) months. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the cementation of a DMC in a well-fixed cup is a promising short- to mid-term treatment addressing THA instability especially in elderly and frail patients, who benefit from a reduced operation time. Proper cementation technique, adequate cup positioning as well as selection of a sufficiently large DMC are crucial for treatment success. Longer FUs will be needed in the future in order to further prove the benefit of this technique. BioMed Central 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8613958/ /pubmed/34819056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04835-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bellova, Petri Koch, Fiona Stiehler, Maik Hartmann, Albrecht Fritzsche, Hagen Günther, Klaus-Peter Goronzy, Jens Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
title | Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
title_full | Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
title_fullStr | Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
title_short | Cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
title_sort | cementation of a dual mobility cup in a well-fixed acetabular component- a reliable option in revision total hip arthroplasty? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04835-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellovapetri cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT kochfiona cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT stiehlermaik cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT hartmannalbrecht cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT fritzschehagen cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT guntherklauspeter cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT goronzyjens cementationofadualmobilitycupinawellfixedacetabularcomponentareliableoptioninrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty |