Cargando…

Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment and risk management are fundamental processes in the delivery of safe and effective mental health care, yet studies have shown that service users are often not directly involved or are unaware that an assessment has taken place. Shared decision-making in mental health sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Nafiso, Barlow, Sally, Reynolds, Lisa, Drey, Nicholas, Begum, Fareha, Tuudah, Elizabeth, Simpson, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03304-0
_version_ 1784603763452936192
author Ahmed, Nafiso
Barlow, Sally
Reynolds, Lisa
Drey, Nicholas
Begum, Fareha
Tuudah, Elizabeth
Simpson, Alan
author_facet Ahmed, Nafiso
Barlow, Sally
Reynolds, Lisa
Drey, Nicholas
Begum, Fareha
Tuudah, Elizabeth
Simpson, Alan
author_sort Ahmed, Nafiso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk assessment and risk management are fundamental processes in the delivery of safe and effective mental health care, yet studies have shown that service users are often not directly involved or are unaware that an assessment has taken place. Shared decision-making in mental health systems is supported by research and advocated in policy. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42016050457) aimed to explore the perceived barriers and enablers to implementing shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management from mental health professionals’ perspectives. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed in the conduct and reporting of this review. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED and Internurse were systematically searched from inception to December 2019. Data were mapped directly into the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a psychological framework that includes 14 domains relevant to behaviour change. Thematic synthesis was used to identify potential barriers and enablers within each domain. Data were then matched to the three components of the COM-B model: Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the eligibility criteria. The findings of this review indicate that shared decision-making is not a concept commonly used in mental health services when exploring processes of risk assessment and risk management. The key barriers identified were ‘power and best interest’ (social influences) and ‘my professional role and responsibility’ (social/professional role and identity). Key enablers were ‘therapeutic relationship’ (social influences) and ‘value collaboration’ (reinforcement). The salient barriers, enablers and linked TDF domains matched COM-B components ‘opportunity’ and ‘motivation’. CONCLUSION: The review highlights the need for further empirical research to better understand current practice and mental health professionals’ experiences and attitudes towards shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-021-03304-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8613998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86139982021-11-29 Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review Ahmed, Nafiso Barlow, Sally Reynolds, Lisa Drey, Nicholas Begum, Fareha Tuudah, Elizabeth Simpson, Alan BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk assessment and risk management are fundamental processes in the delivery of safe and effective mental health care, yet studies have shown that service users are often not directly involved or are unaware that an assessment has taken place. Shared decision-making in mental health systems is supported by research and advocated in policy. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42016050457) aimed to explore the perceived barriers and enablers to implementing shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management from mental health professionals’ perspectives. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed in the conduct and reporting of this review. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED and Internurse were systematically searched from inception to December 2019. Data were mapped directly into the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a psychological framework that includes 14 domains relevant to behaviour change. Thematic synthesis was used to identify potential barriers and enablers within each domain. Data were then matched to the three components of the COM-B model: Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the eligibility criteria. The findings of this review indicate that shared decision-making is not a concept commonly used in mental health services when exploring processes of risk assessment and risk management. The key barriers identified were ‘power and best interest’ (social influences) and ‘my professional role and responsibility’ (social/professional role and identity). Key enablers were ‘therapeutic relationship’ (social influences) and ‘value collaboration’ (reinforcement). The salient barriers, enablers and linked TDF domains matched COM-B components ‘opportunity’ and ‘motivation’. CONCLUSION: The review highlights the need for further empirical research to better understand current practice and mental health professionals’ experiences and attitudes towards shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-021-03304-0. BioMed Central 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8613998/ /pubmed/34823487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03304-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahmed, Nafiso
Barlow, Sally
Reynolds, Lisa
Drey, Nicholas
Begum, Fareha
Tuudah, Elizabeth
Simpson, Alan
Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
title Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
title_full Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
title_fullStr Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
title_short Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
title_sort mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03304-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmednafiso mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview
AT barlowsally mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview
AT reynoldslisa mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview
AT dreynicholas mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview
AT begumfareha mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview
AT tuudahelizabeth mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview
AT simpsonalan mentalhealthprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandenablerstoshareddecisionmakinginriskassessmentandriskmanagementaqualitativesystematicreview