Cargando…

Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been frequently investigated using readily accessible stool samples. However, stool samples might insufficiently represent the mucosa-associated microbiome status. We hypothesized that luminal contents including loosely adherent luminal bacteria a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dan, Jung, Jun-Young, Oh, Hyun-Seok, Jee, Sam-Ryong, Park, Sung Jae, Lee, Sang-Heon, Yoon, Jun-Sik, Yu, Seung Jung, Yoon, In-Cheol, Lee, Hong Sub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01975-3
_version_ 1784603763822034944
author Kim, Dan
Jung, Jun-Young
Oh, Hyun-Seok
Jee, Sam-Ryong
Park, Sung Jae
Lee, Sang-Heon
Yoon, Jun-Sik
Yu, Seung Jung
Yoon, In-Cheol
Lee, Hong Sub
author_facet Kim, Dan
Jung, Jun-Young
Oh, Hyun-Seok
Jee, Sam-Ryong
Park, Sung Jae
Lee, Sang-Heon
Yoon, Jun-Sik
Yu, Seung Jung
Yoon, In-Cheol
Lee, Hong Sub
author_sort Kim, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been frequently investigated using readily accessible stool samples. However, stool samples might insufficiently represent the mucosa-associated microbiome status. We hypothesized that luminal contents including loosely adherent luminal bacteria after bowel preparation may be suitable for diagnosing the dysbiosis of UC. METHODS: This study included 16 patients with UC (9 men and 7 women, mean age: 52.13 ± 14.09 years) and 15 sex- and age-matched healthy individuals (8 men and 7 women, mean age: 50.93 ± 14.11 years). They donated stool samples before colonoscopy and underwent luminal content aspiration and endoscopic biopsy during the colonoscopy. Then, the composition of each microbiome sample was analyzed by 16S rRNA-based next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: The microbiome between stool, luminal contents, and biopsy was significantly different in alpha and beta diversities. However, a correlation existed between stool and luminal contents in the Procrustes test (p = 0.001) and Mantel test (p = 0.0001). The stool microbiome was different between patients with UC and the healthy controls. Conversely, no difference was found in the microbiome of luminal content and biopsy samples between the two subject groups. The microbiome of stool and lavage predicted UC, with AUC values of 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. CONCLUSION: The microbiome of stool, luminal contents, and biopsy was significantly different. However, the microbiome of luminal contents during colonoscopy can predict UC, with AUC values of 0.81. Colonoscopic luminal content aspiration analysis could determine microbiome differences between patients with UC and the healthy control, thereby beneficial in screening dysbiosis via endoscopy. Trial registration: This trial was registered at http://cris.nih.go.kr. Registration No.: KCT0003352), Date: 2018–11-13.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8614001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86140012021-11-29 Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis Kim, Dan Jung, Jun-Young Oh, Hyun-Seok Jee, Sam-Ryong Park, Sung Jae Lee, Sang-Heon Yoon, Jun-Sik Yu, Seung Jung Yoon, In-Cheol Lee, Hong Sub BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been frequently investigated using readily accessible stool samples. However, stool samples might insufficiently represent the mucosa-associated microbiome status. We hypothesized that luminal contents including loosely adherent luminal bacteria after bowel preparation may be suitable for diagnosing the dysbiosis of UC. METHODS: This study included 16 patients with UC (9 men and 7 women, mean age: 52.13 ± 14.09 years) and 15 sex- and age-matched healthy individuals (8 men and 7 women, mean age: 50.93 ± 14.11 years). They donated stool samples before colonoscopy and underwent luminal content aspiration and endoscopic biopsy during the colonoscopy. Then, the composition of each microbiome sample was analyzed by 16S rRNA-based next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: The microbiome between stool, luminal contents, and biopsy was significantly different in alpha and beta diversities. However, a correlation existed between stool and luminal contents in the Procrustes test (p = 0.001) and Mantel test (p = 0.0001). The stool microbiome was different between patients with UC and the healthy controls. Conversely, no difference was found in the microbiome of luminal content and biopsy samples between the two subject groups. The microbiome of stool and lavage predicted UC, with AUC values of 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. CONCLUSION: The microbiome of stool, luminal contents, and biopsy was significantly different. However, the microbiome of luminal contents during colonoscopy can predict UC, with AUC values of 0.81. Colonoscopic luminal content aspiration analysis could determine microbiome differences between patients with UC and the healthy control, thereby beneficial in screening dysbiosis via endoscopy. Trial registration: This trial was registered at http://cris.nih.go.kr. Registration No.: KCT0003352), Date: 2018–11-13. BioMed Central 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8614001/ /pubmed/34686128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01975-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Dan
Jung, Jun-Young
Oh, Hyun-Seok
Jee, Sam-Ryong
Park, Sung Jae
Lee, Sang-Heon
Yoon, Jun-Sik
Yu, Seung Jung
Yoon, In-Cheol
Lee, Hong Sub
Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
title Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
title_full Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
title_fullStr Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
title_short Comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
title_sort comparison of sampling methods in assessing the microbiome from patients with ulcerative colitis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01975-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdan comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT jungjunyoung comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT ohhyunseok comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT jeesamryong comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT parksungjae comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT leesangheon comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT yoonjunsik comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT yuseungjung comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT yoonincheol comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis
AT leehongsub comparisonofsamplingmethodsinassessingthemicrobiomefrompatientswithulcerativecolitis