Cargando…

The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background Although the deterioration in sound quality is not as much as endotracheal intubation, it can also be seen after the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different LMA types on voice performance. Methods This study included 88 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zengin, Musa, Akdaglı Ekici, Arzu, Dogan, Guvenc, Atan, Dogan, Alagoz, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858744
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19056
_version_ 1784603816338915328
author Zengin, Musa
Akdaglı Ekici, Arzu
Dogan, Guvenc
Atan, Dogan
Alagoz, Ali
author_facet Zengin, Musa
Akdaglı Ekici, Arzu
Dogan, Guvenc
Atan, Dogan
Alagoz, Ali
author_sort Zengin, Musa
collection PubMed
description Background Although the deterioration in sound quality is not as much as endotracheal intubation, it can also be seen after the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different LMA types on voice performance. Methods This study included 88 patients aged 18-80 years, whose surgical procedure was not planned to take longer than 120 minutes. In the acoustic voice analysis, F0, jitter%, and shimmer% were examined. In addition, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 questionnaire has completed an evaluation of voice quality. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (I-gel LMA [n=44]; Classic LMA [n=44]) according to the closed envelope method. Results A total of 88 patients were included in the study. Demographic data of the patients were statistically similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The changes in the preoperative and postoperative F0, jitter, and VHI-30 values in the I-gel group were statistically significant (p: 0.002, p: 0.001, p < 0.001). Shimmer values were not significantly different (p: 0.762). In the classical LMA group, preoperative and postoperative F0, jitter, shimmer, and VHI-30 values were statistically significantly different (p: 0.001, p: 0.012, p: 0.036, p < 0.001). Conclusion I-gel LMA and classic LMA negatively affect voice performance in the preoperative and postoperative periods. This situation was also observed in the VHI-30 index test. However, when this situation was evaluated in terms of shimmer analysis, the decrease in voice quality in the early postoperative period was more limited in the I-gel group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8614239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86142392021-12-01 The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study Zengin, Musa Akdaglı Ekici, Arzu Dogan, Guvenc Atan, Dogan Alagoz, Ali Cureus Anesthesiology Background Although the deterioration in sound quality is not as much as endotracheal intubation, it can also be seen after the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different LMA types on voice performance. Methods This study included 88 patients aged 18-80 years, whose surgical procedure was not planned to take longer than 120 minutes. In the acoustic voice analysis, F0, jitter%, and shimmer% were examined. In addition, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 questionnaire has completed an evaluation of voice quality. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (I-gel LMA [n=44]; Classic LMA [n=44]) according to the closed envelope method. Results A total of 88 patients were included in the study. Demographic data of the patients were statistically similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The changes in the preoperative and postoperative F0, jitter, and VHI-30 values in the I-gel group were statistically significant (p: 0.002, p: 0.001, p < 0.001). Shimmer values were not significantly different (p: 0.762). In the classical LMA group, preoperative and postoperative F0, jitter, shimmer, and VHI-30 values were statistically significantly different (p: 0.001, p: 0.012, p: 0.036, p < 0.001). Conclusion I-gel LMA and classic LMA negatively affect voice performance in the preoperative and postoperative periods. This situation was also observed in the VHI-30 index test. However, when this situation was evaluated in terms of shimmer analysis, the decrease in voice quality in the early postoperative period was more limited in the I-gel group. Cureus 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8614239/ /pubmed/34858744 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19056 Text en Copyright © 2021, Zengin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Zengin, Musa
Akdaglı Ekici, Arzu
Dogan, Guvenc
Atan, Dogan
Alagoz, Ali
The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study
title The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_short The Effect of Different Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways on Sound Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort effect of different types of laryngeal mask airways on sound quality: a prospective randomized study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858744
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19056
work_keys_str_mv AT zenginmusa theeffectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT akdaglıekiciarzu theeffectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT doganguvenc theeffectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT atandogan theeffectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT alagozali theeffectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT zenginmusa effectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT akdaglıekiciarzu effectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT doganguvenc effectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT atandogan effectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT alagozali effectofdifferenttypesoflaryngealmaskairwaysonsoundqualityaprospectiverandomizedstudy