Cargando…
Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Welfare assessments for animals require the use of specific indicators. These indicators should be practical and easy to use in an on-farm environment while correctly reflecting on the animals’ welfare. Our aim was to review literature on such indicators for goats, as small ruminants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827870 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11113138 |
_version_ | 1784603858328092672 |
---|---|
author | Minnig, Adrian Zufferey, Romane Thomann, Beat Zwygart, Sibylle Keil, Nina Schüpbach-Regula, Gertraud Miserez, Raymond Stucki, Dimitri Zanolari, Patrik |
author_facet | Minnig, Adrian Zufferey, Romane Thomann, Beat Zwygart, Sibylle Keil, Nina Schüpbach-Regula, Gertraud Miserez, Raymond Stucki, Dimitri Zanolari, Patrik |
author_sort | Minnig, Adrian |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Welfare assessments for animals require the use of specific indicators. These indicators should be practical and easy to use in an on-farm environment while correctly reflecting on the animals’ welfare. Our aim was to review literature on such indicators for goats, as small ruminants have not received as much attention as other farm animals in the field of welfare assessment. Some indicators such as lameness are already well investigated and suitable for use in goat welfare assessments. Others, for example, lying behaviour, need more research, as the limited amount of knowledge restrains the information on validity or usefulness. As in other animals, the welfare of goats has become an increasingly important issue in public discourse. Our overview on indicators aids in developing tools to measure and improve the welfare of goats. ABSTRACT: This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human–animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8614408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86144082021-11-26 Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats Minnig, Adrian Zufferey, Romane Thomann, Beat Zwygart, Sibylle Keil, Nina Schüpbach-Regula, Gertraud Miserez, Raymond Stucki, Dimitri Zanolari, Patrik Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Welfare assessments for animals require the use of specific indicators. These indicators should be practical and easy to use in an on-farm environment while correctly reflecting on the animals’ welfare. Our aim was to review literature on such indicators for goats, as small ruminants have not received as much attention as other farm animals in the field of welfare assessment. Some indicators such as lameness are already well investigated and suitable for use in goat welfare assessments. Others, for example, lying behaviour, need more research, as the limited amount of knowledge restrains the information on validity or usefulness. As in other animals, the welfare of goats has become an increasingly important issue in public discourse. Our overview on indicators aids in developing tools to measure and improve the welfare of goats. ABSTRACT: This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human–animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems. MDPI 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8614408/ /pubmed/34827870 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11113138 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Minnig, Adrian Zufferey, Romane Thomann, Beat Zwygart, Sibylle Keil, Nina Schüpbach-Regula, Gertraud Miserez, Raymond Stucki, Dimitri Zanolari, Patrik Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats |
title | Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats |
title_full | Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats |
title_fullStr | Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats |
title_short | Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats |
title_sort | animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment in goats |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827870 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11113138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minnigadrian animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT zuffereyromane animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT thomannbeat animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT zwygartsibylle animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT keilnina animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT schupbachregulagertraud animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT miserezraymond animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT stuckidimitri animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats AT zanolaripatrik animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentingoats |