Cargando…

Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species

SIMPLE SUMMARY: It is of great interest to quantify adaptive evolution in human lineage by studying genes under positive selection, since these genes could reveal insights into our own adaptive evolutionary history compared to our closely related species and often these genes are functionally import...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Duo, Chen, Guangji, Meng, Xiaoyu, Wang, Haotian, Bi, Xupeng, Fang, Miaoquan, Yang, Chentao, Zhou, Yang, Long, Erping, Feng, Shaohong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11113264
_version_ 1784603884215336960
author Xie, Duo
Chen, Guangji
Meng, Xiaoyu
Wang, Haotian
Bi, Xupeng
Fang, Miaoquan
Yang, Chentao
Zhou, Yang
Long, Erping
Feng, Shaohong
author_facet Xie, Duo
Chen, Guangji
Meng, Xiaoyu
Wang, Haotian
Bi, Xupeng
Fang, Miaoquan
Yang, Chentao
Zhou, Yang
Long, Erping
Feng, Shaohong
author_sort Xie, Duo
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: It is of great interest to quantify adaptive evolution in human lineage by studying genes under positive selection, since these genes could reveal insights into our own adaptive evolutionary history compared to our closely related species and often these genes are functionally important. We used the great apes as the subjects to detect gene-level adaptive evolution signals in all the great ape lineages and investigated the evolutionary patterns and functional relevance of these adaptive evolution signals. Even the differences in population size among these closely related great apes have resulted in differences in their ability to remove deleterious alleles and to adapt to changing environments, we found that they experienced comparable numbers of positive selection. Notably, we identified several genes that offer insights into great ape and human evolution. For example, SOD1, a gene associated with aging in humans, experienced positive selection in the common ancestor of the great ape and this positive selection may contribute to the aging evolution in great apes. Overall, an updated list of positively selected genes reported by this study not only informs us of adaptive evolution during great ape evolution, but is also helpful to the further study of non-human primate models for disease and other fields. ABSTRACT: Alleles that cause advantageous phenotypes with positive selection contribute to adaptive evolution. Investigations of positive selection in protein-coding genes rely on the accuracy of orthology, models, the quality of assemblies, and alignment. Here, based on the latest genome assemblies and gene annotations, we present a comparative analysis on positive selection in four great ape species and identify 211 high-confidence positively selected genes (PSGs). Even the differences in population size among these closely related great apes have resulted in differences in their ability to remove deleterious alleles and to adapt to changing environments, we found that they experienced comparable numbers of positive selection. We also uncovered that more than half of multigene families exhibited signals of positive selection, suggesting that imbalanced positive selection resulted in the functional divergence of duplicates. Moreover, at the expression level, although positive selection led to a more non-uniform pattern across tissues, the correlation between positive selection and expression patterns is diverse. Overall, this updated list of PSGs is of great significance for the further study of the phenotypic evolution in great apes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8614513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86145132021-11-26 Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species Xie, Duo Chen, Guangji Meng, Xiaoyu Wang, Haotian Bi, Xupeng Fang, Miaoquan Yang, Chentao Zhou, Yang Long, Erping Feng, Shaohong Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: It is of great interest to quantify adaptive evolution in human lineage by studying genes under positive selection, since these genes could reveal insights into our own adaptive evolutionary history compared to our closely related species and often these genes are functionally important. We used the great apes as the subjects to detect gene-level adaptive evolution signals in all the great ape lineages and investigated the evolutionary patterns and functional relevance of these adaptive evolution signals. Even the differences in population size among these closely related great apes have resulted in differences in their ability to remove deleterious alleles and to adapt to changing environments, we found that they experienced comparable numbers of positive selection. Notably, we identified several genes that offer insights into great ape and human evolution. For example, SOD1, a gene associated with aging in humans, experienced positive selection in the common ancestor of the great ape and this positive selection may contribute to the aging evolution in great apes. Overall, an updated list of positively selected genes reported by this study not only informs us of adaptive evolution during great ape evolution, but is also helpful to the further study of non-human primate models for disease and other fields. ABSTRACT: Alleles that cause advantageous phenotypes with positive selection contribute to adaptive evolution. Investigations of positive selection in protein-coding genes rely on the accuracy of orthology, models, the quality of assemblies, and alignment. Here, based on the latest genome assemblies and gene annotations, we present a comparative analysis on positive selection in four great ape species and identify 211 high-confidence positively selected genes (PSGs). Even the differences in population size among these closely related great apes have resulted in differences in their ability to remove deleterious alleles and to adapt to changing environments, we found that they experienced comparable numbers of positive selection. We also uncovered that more than half of multigene families exhibited signals of positive selection, suggesting that imbalanced positive selection resulted in the functional divergence of duplicates. Moreover, at the expression level, although positive selection led to a more non-uniform pattern across tissues, the correlation between positive selection and expression patterns is diverse. Overall, this updated list of PSGs is of great significance for the further study of the phenotypic evolution in great apes. MDPI 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8614513/ /pubmed/34827995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11113264 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xie, Duo
Chen, Guangji
Meng, Xiaoyu
Wang, Haotian
Bi, Xupeng
Fang, Miaoquan
Yang, Chentao
Zhou, Yang
Long, Erping
Feng, Shaohong
Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species
title Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species
title_full Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species
title_fullStr Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species
title_full_unstemmed Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species
title_short Comparable Number of Genes Having Experienced Positive Selection among Great Ape Species
title_sort comparable number of genes having experienced positive selection among great ape species
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11113264
work_keys_str_mv AT xieduo comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT chenguangji comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT mengxiaoyu comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT wanghaotian comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT bixupeng comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT fangmiaoquan comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT yangchentao comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT zhouyang comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT longerping comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies
AT fengshaohong comparablenumberofgeneshavingexperiencedpositiveselectionamonggreatapespecies