Cargando…

Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koeck, Joachim Andreas, Hilgarth, Heike, von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Andreas, Meyn, Damaris, Warlich, Ruediger, Münstedt, Andreas, Horn, Dagmar, König, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111330
_version_ 1784603916185370624
author Koeck, Joachim Andreas
Hilgarth, Heike
von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Andreas
Meyn, Damaris
Warlich, Ruediger
Münstedt, Andreas
Horn, Dagmar
König, Christina
author_facet Koeck, Joachim Andreas
Hilgarth, Heike
von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Andreas
Meyn, Damaris
Warlich, Ruediger
Münstedt, Andreas
Horn, Dagmar
König, Christina
author_sort Koeck, Joachim Andreas
collection PubMed
description Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8614667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86146672021-11-26 Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study Koeck, Joachim Andreas Hilgarth, Heike von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Andreas Meyn, Damaris Warlich, Ruediger Münstedt, Andreas Horn, Dagmar König, Christina Antibiotics (Basel) Article Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support. MDPI 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8614667/ /pubmed/34827267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111330 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Koeck, Joachim Andreas
Hilgarth, Heike
von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Andreas
Meyn, Damaris
Warlich, Ruediger
Münstedt, Andreas
Horn, Dagmar
König, Christina
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_full Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_fullStr Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_short Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_sort clinically relevant interactions with anti-infectives on intensive care units—a multicenter delphi study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111330
work_keys_str_mv AT koeckjoachimandreas clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT hilgarthheike clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT vonamelnmayerhoferandreas clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT meyndamaris clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT warlichruediger clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT munstedtandreas clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT horndagmar clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT konigchristina clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy