Cargando…
Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice
The microbiological contamination of the environment in independent healthcare facilities such as dental and general practitioner offices was poorly studied. The aims of this study were to describe qualitatively and quantitatively the bacterial and fungal contamination in these healthcare facilities...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111375 |
_version_ | 1784603929631260672 |
---|---|
author | Baudet, Alexandre Guillaso, Monique Grimmer, Léonie Regad, Marie Florentin, Arnaud |
author_facet | Baudet, Alexandre Guillaso, Monique Grimmer, Léonie Regad, Marie Florentin, Arnaud |
author_sort | Baudet, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | The microbiological contamination of the environment in independent healthcare facilities such as dental and general practitioner offices was poorly studied. The aims of this study were to describe qualitatively and quantitatively the bacterial and fungal contamination in these healthcare facilities and to analyze the antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens identified. Microbiological samples were taken from the surfaces of waiting, consulting, and sterilization rooms and from the air of waiting room of ten dental and general practitioner offices. Six surface samples were collected in each sampled room using agar contact plates and swabs. Indoor air samples were collected in waiting rooms using a single-stage impactor. Bacteria and fungi were cultured, then counted and identified. Antibiograms were performed to test the antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens. On the surfaces, median concentrations of bacteria and fungi were 126 (range: 0–1280) and 26 (range: 0–188) CFU/100 cm(2), respectively. In indoor air, those concentrations were 403 (range: 118–732) and 327 (range: 32–806) CFU/m(3), respectively. The main micro-organisms identified were Gram-positive cocci and filamentous fungi, including six ubiquitous genera: Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Alternaria. Some antibiotic-resistant bacteria were identified in general practitioner offices (penicillin- and erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), but none in dental offices. The dental and general practitioner offices present a poor microbiological contamination with rare pathogenic micro-organisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8614722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86147222021-11-26 Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice Baudet, Alexandre Guillaso, Monique Grimmer, Léonie Regad, Marie Florentin, Arnaud Antibiotics (Basel) Article The microbiological contamination of the environment in independent healthcare facilities such as dental and general practitioner offices was poorly studied. The aims of this study were to describe qualitatively and quantitatively the bacterial and fungal contamination in these healthcare facilities and to analyze the antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens identified. Microbiological samples were taken from the surfaces of waiting, consulting, and sterilization rooms and from the air of waiting room of ten dental and general practitioner offices. Six surface samples were collected in each sampled room using agar contact plates and swabs. Indoor air samples were collected in waiting rooms using a single-stage impactor. Bacteria and fungi were cultured, then counted and identified. Antibiograms were performed to test the antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens. On the surfaces, median concentrations of bacteria and fungi were 126 (range: 0–1280) and 26 (range: 0–188) CFU/100 cm(2), respectively. In indoor air, those concentrations were 403 (range: 118–732) and 327 (range: 32–806) CFU/m(3), respectively. The main micro-organisms identified were Gram-positive cocci and filamentous fungi, including six ubiquitous genera: Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Alternaria. Some antibiotic-resistant bacteria were identified in general practitioner offices (penicillin- and erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), but none in dental offices. The dental and general practitioner offices present a poor microbiological contamination with rare pathogenic micro-organisms. MDPI 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8614722/ /pubmed/34827313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111375 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Baudet, Alexandre Guillaso, Monique Grimmer, Léonie Regad, Marie Florentin, Arnaud Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice |
title | Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice |
title_full | Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice |
title_fullStr | Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice |
title_short | Microbiological Contamination of the Office Environment in Dental and Medical Practice |
title_sort | microbiological contamination of the office environment in dental and medical practice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baudetalexandre microbiologicalcontaminationoftheofficeenvironmentindentalandmedicalpractice AT guillasomonique microbiologicalcontaminationoftheofficeenvironmentindentalandmedicalpractice AT grimmerleonie microbiologicalcontaminationoftheofficeenvironmentindentalandmedicalpractice AT microbiologicalcontaminationoftheofficeenvironmentindentalandmedicalpractice AT regadmarie microbiologicalcontaminationoftheofficeenvironmentindentalandmedicalpractice AT florentinarnaud microbiologicalcontaminationoftheofficeenvironmentindentalandmedicalpractice |