Cargando…

Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in the elderly population. Currently, diagnosis is based on invasive and expensive techniques, so there is a growing need to look for other possible tests, as well as carry out clinical validation. Studies from the literature show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferré-González, Laura, Peña-Bautista, Carmen, Álvarez-Sánchez, Lourdes, Ferrer-Cairols, Inés, Baquero, Miguel, Cháfer-Pericás, Consuelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111662
_version_ 1784603941160353792
author Ferré-González, Laura
Peña-Bautista, Carmen
Álvarez-Sánchez, Lourdes
Ferrer-Cairols, Inés
Baquero, Miguel
Cháfer-Pericás, Consuelo
author_facet Ferré-González, Laura
Peña-Bautista, Carmen
Álvarez-Sánchez, Lourdes
Ferrer-Cairols, Inés
Baquero, Miguel
Cháfer-Pericás, Consuelo
author_sort Ferré-González, Laura
collection PubMed
description Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in the elderly population. Currently, diagnosis is based on invasive and expensive techniques, so there is a growing need to look for other possible tests, as well as carry out clinical validation. Studies from the literature showed potential diagnosis models, including some AD risk factors (age, gender, ApoE-ε4 genotype) and other variables (biomarkers levels, neuroimaging). Specifically, a recent model was performed from lipid peroxidation compounds in plasma samples to identify patients with early AD. However, there is a lack of studies about clinical validation of these preliminary diagnosis models. Methods: Plasma samples from participants classified into AD (n = 61), non-AD (n = 17), and healthy (n = 44) were analyzed. In fact, lipid peroxidation compounds were determined by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Then, a previously developed diagnosis model was clinically validated, evaluating some diagnosis indexes. Results: The validation of the preliminary diagnosis model showed satisfactory diagnosis indexes (accuracy 77%, sensitivity 89%, specificity 61%, diagnostic odds ratio 12.5, positive predictive value 76%). Next, a useful screening tool, including the ApoE genotype, was developed, identifying patients with a higher risk of developing AD and improving the corresponding diagnosis indexes (accuracy 82%, sensitivity 81%, specificity 85%, diagnostic odds ratio 23.2, positive predictive value 90.5%). Conclusion: A new screening approach could improve the early, minimally invasive, and differential AD diagnosis in the general population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8614769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86147692021-11-26 Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis Ferré-González, Laura Peña-Bautista, Carmen Álvarez-Sánchez, Lourdes Ferrer-Cairols, Inés Baquero, Miguel Cháfer-Pericás, Consuelo Antioxidants (Basel) Article Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in the elderly population. Currently, diagnosis is based on invasive and expensive techniques, so there is a growing need to look for other possible tests, as well as carry out clinical validation. Studies from the literature showed potential diagnosis models, including some AD risk factors (age, gender, ApoE-ε4 genotype) and other variables (biomarkers levels, neuroimaging). Specifically, a recent model was performed from lipid peroxidation compounds in plasma samples to identify patients with early AD. However, there is a lack of studies about clinical validation of these preliminary diagnosis models. Methods: Plasma samples from participants classified into AD (n = 61), non-AD (n = 17), and healthy (n = 44) were analyzed. In fact, lipid peroxidation compounds were determined by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Then, a previously developed diagnosis model was clinically validated, evaluating some diagnosis indexes. Results: The validation of the preliminary diagnosis model showed satisfactory diagnosis indexes (accuracy 77%, sensitivity 89%, specificity 61%, diagnostic odds ratio 12.5, positive predictive value 76%). Next, a useful screening tool, including the ApoE genotype, was developed, identifying patients with a higher risk of developing AD and improving the corresponding diagnosis indexes (accuracy 82%, sensitivity 81%, specificity 85%, diagnostic odds ratio 23.2, positive predictive value 90.5%). Conclusion: A new screening approach could improve the early, minimally invasive, and differential AD diagnosis in the general population. MDPI 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8614769/ /pubmed/34829533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111662 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ferré-González, Laura
Peña-Bautista, Carmen
Álvarez-Sánchez, Lourdes
Ferrer-Cairols, Inés
Baquero, Miguel
Cháfer-Pericás, Consuelo
Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
title Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
title_full Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
title_fullStr Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
title_short Assessment of Screening Approach in Early and Differential Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
title_sort assessment of screening approach in early and differential alzheimer’s disease diagnosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111662
work_keys_str_mv AT ferregonzalezlaura assessmentofscreeningapproachinearlyanddifferentialalzheimersdiseasediagnosis
AT penabautistacarmen assessmentofscreeningapproachinearlyanddifferentialalzheimersdiseasediagnosis
AT alvarezsanchezlourdes assessmentofscreeningapproachinearlyanddifferentialalzheimersdiseasediagnosis
AT ferrercairolsines assessmentofscreeningapproachinearlyanddifferentialalzheimersdiseasediagnosis
AT baqueromiguel assessmentofscreeningapproachinearlyanddifferentialalzheimersdiseasediagnosis
AT chaferpericasconsuelo assessmentofscreeningapproachinearlyanddifferentialalzheimersdiseasediagnosis