Cargando…

Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones

Maximizing the value of each available data point in bioprocess development is essential in order to reduce the time-to-market, lower the number of expensive wet-lab experiments, and maximize process understanding. Advanced in silico methods are increasingly being investigated to accomplish these go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Christopher, Marschall, Lukas, Kunzelmann, Marco, Richter, Michael, Rudolph, Frederik, Vajda, Judith, Presser, Beate, Zahel, Thomas, Studts, Joey, Herwig, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8110156
_version_ 1784603995871903744
author Taylor, Christopher
Marschall, Lukas
Kunzelmann, Marco
Richter, Michael
Rudolph, Frederik
Vajda, Judith
Presser, Beate
Zahel, Thomas
Studts, Joey
Herwig, Christoph
author_facet Taylor, Christopher
Marschall, Lukas
Kunzelmann, Marco
Richter, Michael
Rudolph, Frederik
Vajda, Judith
Presser, Beate
Zahel, Thomas
Studts, Joey
Herwig, Christoph
author_sort Taylor, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Maximizing the value of each available data point in bioprocess development is essential in order to reduce the time-to-market, lower the number of expensive wet-lab experiments, and maximize process understanding. Advanced in silico methods are increasingly being investigated to accomplish these goals. Within this contribution, we propose a novel integrated process model procedure to maximize the use of development data to optimize the Stage 1 process validation work flow. We generate an integrated process model based on available data and apply two innovative Monte Carlo simulation-based parameter sensitivity analysis linearization techniques to automate two quality by design activities: determining risk assessment severity rankings and establishing preliminary control strategies for critical process parameters. These procedures are assessed in a case study for proof of concept on a candidate monoclonal antibody bioprocess after process development, but prior to process characterization. The evaluation was successful in returning results that were used to support Stage I process validation milestones and demonstrated the potential to reduce the investigated parameters by up to 24% in process characterization, while simultaneously setting up a strategy for iterative updates of risk assessments and process controls throughout the process life-cycle to ensure a robust and efficient drug supply.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8614990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86149902021-11-26 Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones Taylor, Christopher Marschall, Lukas Kunzelmann, Marco Richter, Michael Rudolph, Frederik Vajda, Judith Presser, Beate Zahel, Thomas Studts, Joey Herwig, Christoph Bioengineering (Basel) Article Maximizing the value of each available data point in bioprocess development is essential in order to reduce the time-to-market, lower the number of expensive wet-lab experiments, and maximize process understanding. Advanced in silico methods are increasingly being investigated to accomplish these goals. Within this contribution, we propose a novel integrated process model procedure to maximize the use of development data to optimize the Stage 1 process validation work flow. We generate an integrated process model based on available data and apply two innovative Monte Carlo simulation-based parameter sensitivity analysis linearization techniques to automate two quality by design activities: determining risk assessment severity rankings and establishing preliminary control strategies for critical process parameters. These procedures are assessed in a case study for proof of concept on a candidate monoclonal antibody bioprocess after process development, but prior to process characterization. The evaluation was successful in returning results that were used to support Stage I process validation milestones and demonstrated the potential to reduce the investigated parameters by up to 24% in process characterization, while simultaneously setting up a strategy for iterative updates of risk assessments and process controls throughout the process life-cycle to ensure a robust and efficient drug supply. MDPI 2021-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8614990/ /pubmed/34821722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8110156 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Taylor, Christopher
Marschall, Lukas
Kunzelmann, Marco
Richter, Michael
Rudolph, Frederik
Vajda, Judith
Presser, Beate
Zahel, Thomas
Studts, Joey
Herwig, Christoph
Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones
title Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones
title_full Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones
title_fullStr Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones
title_full_unstemmed Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones
title_short Integrated Process Model Applications Linking Bioprocess Development to Quality by Design Milestones
title_sort integrated process model applications linking bioprocess development to quality by design milestones
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8614990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8110156
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorchristopher integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT marschalllukas integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT kunzelmannmarco integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT richtermichael integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT rudolphfrederik integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT vajdajudith integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT presserbeate integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT zahelthomas integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT studtsjoey integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones
AT herwigchristoph integratedprocessmodelapplicationslinkingbioprocessdevelopmenttoqualitybydesignmilestones