Cargando…

A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients

Endostatin may predict mortality and kidney impairment in general populations as well as in critically ill patients. We decided to explore the possible role of endostatin as a predictor of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a cohort of unselected inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruge, Toralph, Larsson, Anders, Lipcsey, Miklós, Tydén, Jonas, Johansson, Joakim, Eriksson, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111603
_version_ 1784604119608066048
author Ruge, Toralph
Larsson, Anders
Lipcsey, Miklós
Tydén, Jonas
Johansson, Joakim
Eriksson, Mats
author_facet Ruge, Toralph
Larsson, Anders
Lipcsey, Miklós
Tydén, Jonas
Johansson, Joakim
Eriksson, Mats
author_sort Ruge, Toralph
collection PubMed
description Endostatin may predict mortality and kidney impairment in general populations as well as in critically ill patients. We decided to explore the possible role of endostatin as a predictor of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a cohort of unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Endostatin and creatinine in plasma were analyzed and SAPS3 was determined in 278 patients on ICU arrival at admission to a Swedish medium-sized hospital. SAPS3 had the highest predictive value, 0.85 (95% C.I.: 0.8–0.90), for 30-day mortality. Endostatin, in combination with age, predicted 30-day mortality by 0.76 (95% C.I.: 0.70–0.82). Endostatin, together with age and creatinine, predicted AKI with 0.87 (95% C.I.: 0.83–0.91). Endostatin predicted AKI with [0.68 (0.62–0.74)]. Endostatin predicted RRT, either alone [0.82 (95% C.I.: 0.72–0.91)] or together with age [0.81 (95% C.I.: 0.71–0.91)]. The predicted risk for 30-day mortality, AKI, or RRT during the ICU stay, predicted by plasma endostatin, was not influenced by age. Compared to the complex severity score SAPS3, circulating endostatin, combined with age, offers an easily managed option to predict 30-day mortality. Additionally, circulating endostatin combined with creatinine was closely associated with AKI development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8615500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86155002021-11-26 A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients Ruge, Toralph Larsson, Anders Lipcsey, Miklós Tydén, Jonas Johansson, Joakim Eriksson, Mats Biomedicines Article Endostatin may predict mortality and kidney impairment in general populations as well as in critically ill patients. We decided to explore the possible role of endostatin as a predictor of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a cohort of unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Endostatin and creatinine in plasma were analyzed and SAPS3 was determined in 278 patients on ICU arrival at admission to a Swedish medium-sized hospital. SAPS3 had the highest predictive value, 0.85 (95% C.I.: 0.8–0.90), for 30-day mortality. Endostatin, in combination with age, predicted 30-day mortality by 0.76 (95% C.I.: 0.70–0.82). Endostatin, together with age and creatinine, predicted AKI with 0.87 (95% C.I.: 0.83–0.91). Endostatin predicted AKI with [0.68 (0.62–0.74)]. Endostatin predicted RRT, either alone [0.82 (95% C.I.: 0.72–0.91)] or together with age [0.81 (95% C.I.: 0.71–0.91)]. The predicted risk for 30-day mortality, AKI, or RRT during the ICU stay, predicted by plasma endostatin, was not influenced by age. Compared to the complex severity score SAPS3, circulating endostatin, combined with age, offers an easily managed option to predict 30-day mortality. Additionally, circulating endostatin combined with creatinine was closely associated with AKI development. MDPI 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8615500/ /pubmed/34829832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111603 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruge, Toralph
Larsson, Anders
Lipcsey, Miklós
Tydén, Jonas
Johansson, Joakim
Eriksson, Mats
A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
title A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
title_full A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
title_fullStr A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
title_short A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
title_sort comparison between endostatin and conventional biomarkers on 30-day mortality and renal replacement therapy in unselected intensive care patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111603
work_keys_str_mv AT rugetoralph acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT larssonanders acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT lipcseymiklos acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT tydenjonas acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT johanssonjoakim acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT erikssonmats acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT rugetoralph comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT larssonanders comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT lipcseymiklos comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT tydenjonas comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT johanssonjoakim comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients
AT erikssonmats comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients