Cargando…
A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients
Endostatin may predict mortality and kidney impairment in general populations as well as in critically ill patients. We decided to explore the possible role of endostatin as a predictor of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a cohort of unselected inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111603 |
_version_ | 1784604119608066048 |
---|---|
author | Ruge, Toralph Larsson, Anders Lipcsey, Miklós Tydén, Jonas Johansson, Joakim Eriksson, Mats |
author_facet | Ruge, Toralph Larsson, Anders Lipcsey, Miklós Tydén, Jonas Johansson, Joakim Eriksson, Mats |
author_sort | Ruge, Toralph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endostatin may predict mortality and kidney impairment in general populations as well as in critically ill patients. We decided to explore the possible role of endostatin as a predictor of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a cohort of unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Endostatin and creatinine in plasma were analyzed and SAPS3 was determined in 278 patients on ICU arrival at admission to a Swedish medium-sized hospital. SAPS3 had the highest predictive value, 0.85 (95% C.I.: 0.8–0.90), for 30-day mortality. Endostatin, in combination with age, predicted 30-day mortality by 0.76 (95% C.I.: 0.70–0.82). Endostatin, together with age and creatinine, predicted AKI with 0.87 (95% C.I.: 0.83–0.91). Endostatin predicted AKI with [0.68 (0.62–0.74)]. Endostatin predicted RRT, either alone [0.82 (95% C.I.: 0.72–0.91)] or together with age [0.81 (95% C.I.: 0.71–0.91)]. The predicted risk for 30-day mortality, AKI, or RRT during the ICU stay, predicted by plasma endostatin, was not influenced by age. Compared to the complex severity score SAPS3, circulating endostatin, combined with age, offers an easily managed option to predict 30-day mortality. Additionally, circulating endostatin combined with creatinine was closely associated with AKI development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8615500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86155002021-11-26 A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients Ruge, Toralph Larsson, Anders Lipcsey, Miklós Tydén, Jonas Johansson, Joakim Eriksson, Mats Biomedicines Article Endostatin may predict mortality and kidney impairment in general populations as well as in critically ill patients. We decided to explore the possible role of endostatin as a predictor of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a cohort of unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Endostatin and creatinine in plasma were analyzed and SAPS3 was determined in 278 patients on ICU arrival at admission to a Swedish medium-sized hospital. SAPS3 had the highest predictive value, 0.85 (95% C.I.: 0.8–0.90), for 30-day mortality. Endostatin, in combination with age, predicted 30-day mortality by 0.76 (95% C.I.: 0.70–0.82). Endostatin, together with age and creatinine, predicted AKI with 0.87 (95% C.I.: 0.83–0.91). Endostatin predicted AKI with [0.68 (0.62–0.74)]. Endostatin predicted RRT, either alone [0.82 (95% C.I.: 0.72–0.91)] or together with age [0.81 (95% C.I.: 0.71–0.91)]. The predicted risk for 30-day mortality, AKI, or RRT during the ICU stay, predicted by plasma endostatin, was not influenced by age. Compared to the complex severity score SAPS3, circulating endostatin, combined with age, offers an easily managed option to predict 30-day mortality. Additionally, circulating endostatin combined with creatinine was closely associated with AKI development. MDPI 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8615500/ /pubmed/34829832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111603 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ruge, Toralph Larsson, Anders Lipcsey, Miklós Tydén, Jonas Johansson, Joakim Eriksson, Mats A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients |
title | A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients |
title_full | A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients |
title_fullStr | A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients |
title_short | A Comparison between Endostatin and Conventional Biomarkers on 30-Day Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy in Unselected Intensive Care Patients |
title_sort | comparison between endostatin and conventional biomarkers on 30-day mortality and renal replacement therapy in unselected intensive care patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rugetoralph acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT larssonanders acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT lipcseymiklos acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT tydenjonas acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT johanssonjoakim acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT erikssonmats acomparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT rugetoralph comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT larssonanders comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT lipcseymiklos comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT tydenjonas comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT johanssonjoakim comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients AT erikssonmats comparisonbetweenendostatinandconventionalbiomarkerson30daymortalityandrenalreplacementtherapyinunselectedintensivecarepatients |