Cargando…

Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: An electronic nose applies a sensor array to detect volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath to diagnose diseases. The overall diagnostic accuracy remains unknown. The objective of this review was to provide an estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of sensor-based breath tests for the dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hsiao-Yu, Chen, Wan-Chin, Tsai, Rodger-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11110469
_version_ 1784604151465902080
author Yang, Hsiao-Yu
Chen, Wan-Chin
Tsai, Rodger-Chen
author_facet Yang, Hsiao-Yu
Chen, Wan-Chin
Tsai, Rodger-Chen
author_sort Yang, Hsiao-Yu
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: An electronic nose applies a sensor array to detect volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath to diagnose diseases. The overall diagnostic accuracy remains unknown. The objective of this review was to provide an estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of sensor-based breath tests for the diagnosis of diseases. (2) Methods: We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies published between 1 January 2010 and 14 October 2021. The search was limited to human studies published in the English language. Clinical trials were not included in this review. (3) Results: Of the 2418 records identified, 44 publications were eligible, and 5728 patients were included in the final analyses. The pooled sensitivity was 90.0% (95% CI, 86.3–92.8%, I(2) = 47.7%), the specificity was 88.4% (95% CI, 87.1–89.5%, I(2) = 81.4%), and the pooled area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91–0.95). (4) Conclusion: The findings of our review suggest that a standardized report of diagnostic accuracy and a report of the accuracy in a test set are needed. Sensor array systems of electronic noses have the potential for noninvasiveness at the point-of-care in hospitals. Nevertheless, the procedure for reporting the accuracy of a diagnostic test must be standardized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8615633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86156332021-11-26 Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yang, Hsiao-Yu Chen, Wan-Chin Tsai, Rodger-Chen Biosensors (Basel) Article (1) Background: An electronic nose applies a sensor array to detect volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath to diagnose diseases. The overall diagnostic accuracy remains unknown. The objective of this review was to provide an estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of sensor-based breath tests for the diagnosis of diseases. (2) Methods: We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies published between 1 January 2010 and 14 October 2021. The search was limited to human studies published in the English language. Clinical trials were not included in this review. (3) Results: Of the 2418 records identified, 44 publications were eligible, and 5728 patients were included in the final analyses. The pooled sensitivity was 90.0% (95% CI, 86.3–92.8%, I(2) = 47.7%), the specificity was 88.4% (95% CI, 87.1–89.5%, I(2) = 81.4%), and the pooled area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91–0.95). (4) Conclusion: The findings of our review suggest that a standardized report of diagnostic accuracy and a report of the accuracy in a test set are needed. Sensor array systems of electronic noses have the potential for noninvasiveness at the point-of-care in hospitals. Nevertheless, the procedure for reporting the accuracy of a diagnostic test must be standardized. MDPI 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8615633/ /pubmed/34821685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11110469 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Hsiao-Yu
Chen, Wan-Chin
Tsai, Rodger-Chen
Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort accuracy of the electronic nose breath tests in clinical application: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11110469
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghsiaoyu accuracyoftheelectronicnosebreathtestsinclinicalapplicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenwanchin accuracyoftheelectronicnosebreathtestsinclinicalapplicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tsairodgerchen accuracyoftheelectronicnosebreathtestsinclinicalapplicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis