Cargando…

The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience

In this work we intend to validate the long-term oncologic outcomes for very low rectal cancer over the past 20 years and to determine whether laparoscopic procedures are useful options for very low rectal cancer. A total of 327 patients, who electively underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Hyuk-Jun, Kim, Jun-Gi, Kim, Hyung-Jin, Cho, Hyeon-Min, Kye, Bong-Hyeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111720
_version_ 1784604190417354752
author Chung, Hyuk-Jun
Kim, Jun-Gi
Kim, Hyung-Jin
Cho, Hyeon-Min
Kye, Bong-Hyeon
author_facet Chung, Hyuk-Jun
Kim, Jun-Gi
Kim, Hyung-Jin
Cho, Hyeon-Min
Kye, Bong-Hyeon
author_sort Chung, Hyuk-Jun
collection PubMed
description In this work we intend to validate the long-term oncologic outcomes for very low rectal cancer over the past 20 years and to determine whether laparoscopic procedures are useful options for very low rectal cancer. A total of 327 patients, who electively underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery for a lesion within 5 cm from the anal verge, were enrolled in this study and their long-term outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Of 327 patients, 70 patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR), 164 underwent laparoscopic abdominal transanal proctosigmoidocolectomy with coloanal anastomosis (LATA), and 93 underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). The conversion rate was 1.22% (4/327). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 26.30% (86/327). The 5-year disease free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), and 3-year local recurrence (LR) were 64.3%, 79.7%, and 9.2%, respectively. The CRM involvement was a significant independent factor for DFS (p = 0.018) and OS (p = 0.042) in multivariate analysis. Laparoscopic APR showed poorer 5-year DFS (47.8%), 5-year OS (64.0%), and 3-year LR (17.6%) than laparoscopic LAR (74.1%, 86.4%, 1.9%) and laparoscopic LATA (69.2%, 83.6%, 9.2%). Laparoscopic procedures for very low rectal cancer including LAR, LATA, and APR could be good surgical options in selective patients with very low rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8615789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86157892021-11-26 The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience Chung, Hyuk-Jun Kim, Jun-Gi Kim, Hyung-Jin Cho, Hyeon-Min Kye, Bong-Hyeon Biomedicines Article In this work we intend to validate the long-term oncologic outcomes for very low rectal cancer over the past 20 years and to determine whether laparoscopic procedures are useful options for very low rectal cancer. A total of 327 patients, who electively underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery for a lesion within 5 cm from the anal verge, were enrolled in this study and their long-term outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Of 327 patients, 70 patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR), 164 underwent laparoscopic abdominal transanal proctosigmoidocolectomy with coloanal anastomosis (LATA), and 93 underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). The conversion rate was 1.22% (4/327). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 26.30% (86/327). The 5-year disease free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), and 3-year local recurrence (LR) were 64.3%, 79.7%, and 9.2%, respectively. The CRM involvement was a significant independent factor for DFS (p = 0.018) and OS (p = 0.042) in multivariate analysis. Laparoscopic APR showed poorer 5-year DFS (47.8%), 5-year OS (64.0%), and 3-year LR (17.6%) than laparoscopic LAR (74.1%, 86.4%, 1.9%) and laparoscopic LATA (69.2%, 83.6%, 9.2%). Laparoscopic procedures for very low rectal cancer including LAR, LATA, and APR could be good surgical options in selective patients with very low rectal cancer. MDPI 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8615789/ /pubmed/34829951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111720 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chung, Hyuk-Jun
Kim, Jun-Gi
Kim, Hyung-Jin
Cho, Hyeon-Min
Kye, Bong-Hyeon
The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
title The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
title_full The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
title_fullStr The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
title_full_unstemmed The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
title_short The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
title_sort safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis based on a single center’s experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111720
work_keys_str_mv AT chunghyukjun thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT kimjungi thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT kimhyungjin thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT chohyeonmin thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT kyebonghyeon thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT chunghyukjun safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT kimjungi safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT kimhyungjin safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT chohyeonmin safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience
AT kyebonghyeon safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopicsurgeryforverylowrectalcanceraretrospectiveanalysisbasedonasinglecentersexperience