Cargando…
Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Survival after diagnosis of metastatic uveal melanoma has not significantly improved over decades, most patients die within a year from diagnosis. Uveal melanoma is clearly distinct from cutaneous melanoma and the therapies developed for the latter do not work for the former. This is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225684 |
_version_ | 1784604251258880000 |
---|---|
author | Rossi, Ernesto Croce, Michela Reggiani, Francesco Schinzari, Giovanni Ambrosio, Marianna Gangemi, Rosaria Tortora, Giampaolo Pfeffer, Ulrich Amaro, Adriana |
author_facet | Rossi, Ernesto Croce, Michela Reggiani, Francesco Schinzari, Giovanni Ambrosio, Marianna Gangemi, Rosaria Tortora, Giampaolo Pfeffer, Ulrich Amaro, Adriana |
author_sort | Rossi, Ernesto |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Survival after diagnosis of metastatic uveal melanoma has not significantly improved over decades, most patients die within a year from diagnosis. Uveal melanoma is clearly distinct from cutaneous melanoma and the therapies developed for the latter do not work for the former. This is apparently due to three major aspects of UM: (i) the mutations that drive UM tumorigenesis activate two oncogenic signaling pathways and one of the two cannot yet be targeted by therapy; (ii) UM has relatively few tumor specific neo-antigens that could be presented to the immune system and therefore evades immune control; and (iii) UM shows an infiltrate of inflammatory cells that promote tumor progression. However, in the future, there might be drugs to target both oncogenic pathways that are activated in UM, new immune therapy approaches might circumvent the paucity of neo-antigens and liver directed, local therapy might improve response to cytostatic therapy. Hopefully, there will be therapies that can repeat the success obtained with targeted and immune therapy for cutaneous melanoma. ABSTRACT: Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8616038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86160382021-11-26 Uveal Melanoma Metastasis Rossi, Ernesto Croce, Michela Reggiani, Francesco Schinzari, Giovanni Ambrosio, Marianna Gangemi, Rosaria Tortora, Giampaolo Pfeffer, Ulrich Amaro, Adriana Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Survival after diagnosis of metastatic uveal melanoma has not significantly improved over decades, most patients die within a year from diagnosis. Uveal melanoma is clearly distinct from cutaneous melanoma and the therapies developed for the latter do not work for the former. This is apparently due to three major aspects of UM: (i) the mutations that drive UM tumorigenesis activate two oncogenic signaling pathways and one of the two cannot yet be targeted by therapy; (ii) UM has relatively few tumor specific neo-antigens that could be presented to the immune system and therefore evades immune control; and (iii) UM shows an infiltrate of inflammatory cells that promote tumor progression. However, in the future, there might be drugs to target both oncogenic pathways that are activated in UM, new immune therapy approaches might circumvent the paucity of neo-antigens and liver directed, local therapy might improve response to cytostatic therapy. Hopefully, there will be therapies that can repeat the success obtained with targeted and immune therapy for cutaneous melanoma. ABSTRACT: Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM. MDPI 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8616038/ /pubmed/34830841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225684 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Rossi, Ernesto Croce, Michela Reggiani, Francesco Schinzari, Giovanni Ambrosio, Marianna Gangemi, Rosaria Tortora, Giampaolo Pfeffer, Ulrich Amaro, Adriana Uveal Melanoma Metastasis |
title | Uveal Melanoma Metastasis |
title_full | Uveal Melanoma Metastasis |
title_fullStr | Uveal Melanoma Metastasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Uveal Melanoma Metastasis |
title_short | Uveal Melanoma Metastasis |
title_sort | uveal melanoma metastasis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossiernesto uvealmelanomametastasis AT crocemichela uvealmelanomametastasis AT reggianifrancesco uvealmelanomametastasis AT schinzarigiovanni uvealmelanomametastasis AT ambrosiomarianna uvealmelanomametastasis AT gangemirosaria uvealmelanomametastasis AT tortoragiampaolo uvealmelanomametastasis AT pfefferulrich uvealmelanomametastasis AT amaroadriana uvealmelanomametastasis |