Cargando…

Uveal Melanoma Metastasis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Survival after diagnosis of metastatic uveal melanoma has not significantly improved over decades, most patients die within a year from diagnosis. Uveal melanoma is clearly distinct from cutaneous melanoma and the therapies developed for the latter do not work for the former. This is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Ernesto, Croce, Michela, Reggiani, Francesco, Schinzari, Giovanni, Ambrosio, Marianna, Gangemi, Rosaria, Tortora, Giampaolo, Pfeffer, Ulrich, Amaro, Adriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225684
_version_ 1784604251258880000
author Rossi, Ernesto
Croce, Michela
Reggiani, Francesco
Schinzari, Giovanni
Ambrosio, Marianna
Gangemi, Rosaria
Tortora, Giampaolo
Pfeffer, Ulrich
Amaro, Adriana
author_facet Rossi, Ernesto
Croce, Michela
Reggiani, Francesco
Schinzari, Giovanni
Ambrosio, Marianna
Gangemi, Rosaria
Tortora, Giampaolo
Pfeffer, Ulrich
Amaro, Adriana
author_sort Rossi, Ernesto
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Survival after diagnosis of metastatic uveal melanoma has not significantly improved over decades, most patients die within a year from diagnosis. Uveal melanoma is clearly distinct from cutaneous melanoma and the therapies developed for the latter do not work for the former. This is apparently due to three major aspects of UM: (i) the mutations that drive UM tumorigenesis activate two oncogenic signaling pathways and one of the two cannot yet be targeted by therapy; (ii) UM has relatively few tumor specific neo-antigens that could be presented to the immune system and therefore evades immune control; and (iii) UM shows an infiltrate of inflammatory cells that promote tumor progression. However, in the future, there might be drugs to target both oncogenic pathways that are activated in UM, new immune therapy approaches might circumvent the paucity of neo-antigens and liver directed, local therapy might improve response to cytostatic therapy. Hopefully, there will be therapies that can repeat the success obtained with targeted and immune therapy for cutaneous melanoma. ABSTRACT: Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8616038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86160382021-11-26 Uveal Melanoma Metastasis Rossi, Ernesto Croce, Michela Reggiani, Francesco Schinzari, Giovanni Ambrosio, Marianna Gangemi, Rosaria Tortora, Giampaolo Pfeffer, Ulrich Amaro, Adriana Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Survival after diagnosis of metastatic uveal melanoma has not significantly improved over decades, most patients die within a year from diagnosis. Uveal melanoma is clearly distinct from cutaneous melanoma and the therapies developed for the latter do not work for the former. This is apparently due to three major aspects of UM: (i) the mutations that drive UM tumorigenesis activate two oncogenic signaling pathways and one of the two cannot yet be targeted by therapy; (ii) UM has relatively few tumor specific neo-antigens that could be presented to the immune system and therefore evades immune control; and (iii) UM shows an infiltrate of inflammatory cells that promote tumor progression. However, in the future, there might be drugs to target both oncogenic pathways that are activated in UM, new immune therapy approaches might circumvent the paucity of neo-antigens and liver directed, local therapy might improve response to cytostatic therapy. Hopefully, there will be therapies that can repeat the success obtained with targeted and immune therapy for cutaneous melanoma. ABSTRACT: Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM. MDPI 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8616038/ /pubmed/34830841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225684 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rossi, Ernesto
Croce, Michela
Reggiani, Francesco
Schinzari, Giovanni
Ambrosio, Marianna
Gangemi, Rosaria
Tortora, Giampaolo
Pfeffer, Ulrich
Amaro, Adriana
Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
title Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
title_full Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
title_fullStr Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
title_short Uveal Melanoma Metastasis
title_sort uveal melanoma metastasis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225684
work_keys_str_mv AT rossiernesto uvealmelanomametastasis
AT crocemichela uvealmelanomametastasis
AT reggianifrancesco uvealmelanomametastasis
AT schinzarigiovanni uvealmelanomametastasis
AT ambrosiomarianna uvealmelanomametastasis
AT gangemirosaria uvealmelanomametastasis
AT tortoragiampaolo uvealmelanomametastasis
AT pfefferulrich uvealmelanomametastasis
AT amaroadriana uvealmelanomametastasis