Cargando…

A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) has become the standard fractionation scheme for most breast cancer patients. Despite comprehensive data from large, randomized trials, standardized assessment of patient reported outcome (PRO) and physiological changes after HF are largely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borm, Kai J., Kleine Vennekate, Johanne, Vagedes, Jan, Islam, Mohammad O. A., Duma, Marciana N., Loos, Maximilian, Combs, Stephanie E., Schiller, Kilian, Klusen, Sophie, Paepke, Stefan, Kiechle, Marion B., Paepke, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225826
_version_ 1784604304737304576
author Borm, Kai J.
Kleine Vennekate, Johanne
Vagedes, Jan
Islam, Mohammad O. A.
Duma, Marciana N.
Loos, Maximilian
Combs, Stephanie E.
Schiller, Kilian
Klusen, Sophie
Paepke, Stefan
Kiechle, Marion B.
Paepke, Daniela
author_facet Borm, Kai J.
Kleine Vennekate, Johanne
Vagedes, Jan
Islam, Mohammad O. A.
Duma, Marciana N.
Loos, Maximilian
Combs, Stephanie E.
Schiller, Kilian
Klusen, Sophie
Paepke, Stefan
Kiechle, Marion B.
Paepke, Daniela
author_sort Borm, Kai J.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) has become the standard fractionation scheme for most breast cancer patients. Despite comprehensive data from large, randomized trials, standardized assessment of patient reported outcome (PRO) and physiological changes after HF are largely missing. In this prospective trial focusing on radiodermatitis, HF and conventional normofractionated radiotherapy (CF) were compared using standardized Skindex-16 questionnaire in addition to CTCAE assessment and ultrasound measurement of the skin. The results of the current study complement and confirm existing evidence that HF leads to a lower degree of acute radiodermatitis and better patient reported outcome compared to CF. ABSTRACT: The current study aims to determine whether hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) leads to lower rates of acute radiodermatitis compared to conventional normofractionated radiotherapy (CF). A total of 166 patients with invasive breast cancer or DCIS were included in a prospective cohort study. Evaluation of acute radiodermatitis was obtained before radiotherapy, at the end of the treatment (T1), and 6 weeks after the treatment (T2) using CTCAE (v5.0) scores, the Skindex-16 questionnaire, and ultrasound measurement of the skin. CTCAE and Skindex-16 scores in the CF-group were significantly higher compared to the HF group indicating more pronounced side effects at the end of the treatment (CTCAE: CF-RT 1.0 (IQR: 0.0) vs. HF-RT 0.0 (0.25); p = 0.03; Skindex-16: CF: 20.8 (IQR: 25.8); HF: 8.3 (27.1); p = 0.04). At 6 weeks after the treatment, no significant differences between the two fractionation schemes were observed. Ultrasound based assessment showed that the skin thickness in the treated breast was higher compared to the healthy breast at all time-points. However, no significant difference between HF and CF was seen either at T1 or T2. The current study complements and confirms pre-existing evidence that HF leads to a lower degree of acute radiodermatitis and better patient reported outcome compared to CF at the end of treatment. This should be considered whenever fractionation of adjuvant breast cancer treatment is being discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8616262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86162622021-11-26 A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Borm, Kai J. Kleine Vennekate, Johanne Vagedes, Jan Islam, Mohammad O. A. Duma, Marciana N. Loos, Maximilian Combs, Stephanie E. Schiller, Kilian Klusen, Sophie Paepke, Stefan Kiechle, Marion B. Paepke, Daniela Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) has become the standard fractionation scheme for most breast cancer patients. Despite comprehensive data from large, randomized trials, standardized assessment of patient reported outcome (PRO) and physiological changes after HF are largely missing. In this prospective trial focusing on radiodermatitis, HF and conventional normofractionated radiotherapy (CF) were compared using standardized Skindex-16 questionnaire in addition to CTCAE assessment and ultrasound measurement of the skin. The results of the current study complement and confirm existing evidence that HF leads to a lower degree of acute radiodermatitis and better patient reported outcome compared to CF. ABSTRACT: The current study aims to determine whether hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) leads to lower rates of acute radiodermatitis compared to conventional normofractionated radiotherapy (CF). A total of 166 patients with invasive breast cancer or DCIS were included in a prospective cohort study. Evaluation of acute radiodermatitis was obtained before radiotherapy, at the end of the treatment (T1), and 6 weeks after the treatment (T2) using CTCAE (v5.0) scores, the Skindex-16 questionnaire, and ultrasound measurement of the skin. CTCAE and Skindex-16 scores in the CF-group were significantly higher compared to the HF group indicating more pronounced side effects at the end of the treatment (CTCAE: CF-RT 1.0 (IQR: 0.0) vs. HF-RT 0.0 (0.25); p = 0.03; Skindex-16: CF: 20.8 (IQR: 25.8); HF: 8.3 (27.1); p = 0.04). At 6 weeks after the treatment, no significant differences between the two fractionation schemes were observed. Ultrasound based assessment showed that the skin thickness in the treated breast was higher compared to the healthy breast at all time-points. However, no significant difference between HF and CF was seen either at T1 or T2. The current study complements and confirms pre-existing evidence that HF leads to a lower degree of acute radiodermatitis and better patient reported outcome compared to CF at the end of treatment. This should be considered whenever fractionation of adjuvant breast cancer treatment is being discussed. MDPI 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8616262/ /pubmed/34830981 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225826 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Borm, Kai J.
Kleine Vennekate, Johanne
Vagedes, Jan
Islam, Mohammad O. A.
Duma, Marciana N.
Loos, Maximilian
Combs, Stephanie E.
Schiller, Kilian
Klusen, Sophie
Paepke, Stefan
Kiechle, Marion B.
Paepke, Daniela
A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer
title A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer
title_full A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer
title_short A Comprehensive Prospective Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity after Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer
title_sort comprehensive prospective comparison of acute skin toxicity after hypofractionated and normofractionated radiation therapy in breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225826
work_keys_str_mv AT bormkaij acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT kleinevennekatejohanne acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT vagedesjan acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT islammohammadoa acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT dumamarcianan acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT loosmaximilian acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT combsstephaniee acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT schillerkilian acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT klusensophie acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT paepkestefan acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT kiechlemarionb acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT paepkedaniela acomprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT bormkaij comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT kleinevennekatejohanne comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT vagedesjan comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT islammohammadoa comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT dumamarcianan comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT loosmaximilian comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT combsstephaniee comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT schillerkilian comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT klusensophie comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT paepkestefan comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT kiechlemarionb comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT paepkedaniela comprehensiveprospectivecomparisonofacuteskintoxicityafterhypofractionatedandnormofractionatedradiationtherapyinbreastcancer