Cargando…
Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Uterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225808 |
_version_ | 1784604356422664192 |
---|---|
author | Dondi, Giulia Porcu, Eleonora De Palma, Alessandra Damiano, Giuseppe De Crescenzo, Eugenia Cipriani, Linda Dirodi, Maria Ravegnini, Gloria De Leo, Antonio Nannini, Margherita Ferioli, Martina Morganti, Alessio G. Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza De Iaco, Pierandrea Perrone, Anna Myriam |
author_facet | Dondi, Giulia Porcu, Eleonora De Palma, Alessandra Damiano, Giuseppe De Crescenzo, Eugenia Cipriani, Linda Dirodi, Maria Ravegnini, Gloria De Leo, Antonio Nannini, Margherita Ferioli, Martina Morganti, Alessio G. Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza De Iaco, Pierandrea Perrone, Anna Myriam |
author_sort | Dondi, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Uterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the oncological safety and reproductive outcomes remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to report and summarize all the published evidence about the fertility-sparing approach in these rare and heterogenous tumors, and to help physicians in making clinical decisions. ABSTRACT: Uterine sarcomas are rare cancers, sometimes diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Hysterectomy is the standard treatment in early stages. The option of lesion removal to save fertility is described in the literature, but it is still considered experimental. The objective of this systematic review is to report on the available evidence on the reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in women with uterine sarcomas. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between 1 January 2011 and 21 June 2021 for publications in English about women with uterine sarcoma treated with a fertility-sparing intervention. Thirty-seven studies were included for a total of 210 patients: 63 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 35 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the cervix, 19 adenosarcomas, 7 leiomyosarcomas and 2 uterine tumors resembling an ovarian sex cord. Conservative treatment ensured pregnancy in 32% of cases. In terms of oncological outcomes, relapse was related to histology and the worst prognosis was reported for leiomyosarcoma, followed by low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, which relapsed in 71% and 54% of cases, respectively. The highest death rate was associated with leiomyosarcoma (57.1%). This study demonstrated that fertility-sparing treatments may be employed in selected cases of early stage uterine sarcoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8616470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86164702021-11-26 Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review Dondi, Giulia Porcu, Eleonora De Palma, Alessandra Damiano, Giuseppe De Crescenzo, Eugenia Cipriani, Linda Dirodi, Maria Ravegnini, Gloria De Leo, Antonio Nannini, Margherita Ferioli, Martina Morganti, Alessio G. Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza De Iaco, Pierandrea Perrone, Anna Myriam Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Uterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the oncological safety and reproductive outcomes remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to report and summarize all the published evidence about the fertility-sparing approach in these rare and heterogenous tumors, and to help physicians in making clinical decisions. ABSTRACT: Uterine sarcomas are rare cancers, sometimes diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Hysterectomy is the standard treatment in early stages. The option of lesion removal to save fertility is described in the literature, but it is still considered experimental. The objective of this systematic review is to report on the available evidence on the reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in women with uterine sarcomas. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between 1 January 2011 and 21 June 2021 for publications in English about women with uterine sarcoma treated with a fertility-sparing intervention. Thirty-seven studies were included for a total of 210 patients: 63 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 35 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the cervix, 19 adenosarcomas, 7 leiomyosarcomas and 2 uterine tumors resembling an ovarian sex cord. Conservative treatment ensured pregnancy in 32% of cases. In terms of oncological outcomes, relapse was related to histology and the worst prognosis was reported for leiomyosarcoma, followed by low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, which relapsed in 71% and 54% of cases, respectively. The highest death rate was associated with leiomyosarcoma (57.1%). This study demonstrated that fertility-sparing treatments may be employed in selected cases of early stage uterine sarcoma. MDPI 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8616470/ /pubmed/34830960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225808 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Dondi, Giulia Porcu, Eleonora De Palma, Alessandra Damiano, Giuseppe De Crescenzo, Eugenia Cipriani, Linda Dirodi, Maria Ravegnini, Gloria De Leo, Antonio Nannini, Margherita Ferioli, Martina Morganti, Alessio G. Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza De Iaco, Pierandrea Perrone, Anna Myriam Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review |
title | Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | uterine preservation treatments in sarcomas: oncological problems and reproductive results: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dondigiulia uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT porcueleonora uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT depalmaalessandra uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT damianogiuseppe uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT decrescenzoeugenia uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT ciprianilinda uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT dirodimaria uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT ravegninigloria uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT deleoantonio uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT nanninimargherita uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT feriolimartina uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT morgantialessiog uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT pantaleomariaabbondanza uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT deiacopierandrea uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview AT perroneannamyriam uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview |