Cargando…

Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Uterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dondi, Giulia, Porcu, Eleonora, De Palma, Alessandra, Damiano, Giuseppe, De Crescenzo, Eugenia, Cipriani, Linda, Dirodi, Maria, Ravegnini, Gloria, De Leo, Antonio, Nannini, Margherita, Ferioli, Martina, Morganti, Alessio G., Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza, De Iaco, Pierandrea, Perrone, Anna Myriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225808
_version_ 1784604356422664192
author Dondi, Giulia
Porcu, Eleonora
De Palma, Alessandra
Damiano, Giuseppe
De Crescenzo, Eugenia
Cipriani, Linda
Dirodi, Maria
Ravegnini, Gloria
De Leo, Antonio
Nannini, Margherita
Ferioli, Martina
Morganti, Alessio G.
Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza
De Iaco, Pierandrea
Perrone, Anna Myriam
author_facet Dondi, Giulia
Porcu, Eleonora
De Palma, Alessandra
Damiano, Giuseppe
De Crescenzo, Eugenia
Cipriani, Linda
Dirodi, Maria
Ravegnini, Gloria
De Leo, Antonio
Nannini, Margherita
Ferioli, Martina
Morganti, Alessio G.
Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza
De Iaco, Pierandrea
Perrone, Anna Myriam
author_sort Dondi, Giulia
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Uterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the oncological safety and reproductive outcomes remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to report and summarize all the published evidence about the fertility-sparing approach in these rare and heterogenous tumors, and to help physicians in making clinical decisions. ABSTRACT: Uterine sarcomas are rare cancers, sometimes diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Hysterectomy is the standard treatment in early stages. The option of lesion removal to save fertility is described in the literature, but it is still considered experimental. The objective of this systematic review is to report on the available evidence on the reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in women with uterine sarcomas. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between 1 January 2011 and 21 June 2021 for publications in English about women with uterine sarcoma treated with a fertility-sparing intervention. Thirty-seven studies were included for a total of 210 patients: 63 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 35 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the cervix, 19 adenosarcomas, 7 leiomyosarcomas and 2 uterine tumors resembling an ovarian sex cord. Conservative treatment ensured pregnancy in 32% of cases. In terms of oncological outcomes, relapse was related to histology and the worst prognosis was reported for leiomyosarcoma, followed by low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, which relapsed in 71% and 54% of cases, respectively. The highest death rate was associated with leiomyosarcoma (57.1%). This study demonstrated that fertility-sparing treatments may be employed in selected cases of early stage uterine sarcoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8616470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86164702021-11-26 Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review Dondi, Giulia Porcu, Eleonora De Palma, Alessandra Damiano, Giuseppe De Crescenzo, Eugenia Cipriani, Linda Dirodi, Maria Ravegnini, Gloria De Leo, Antonio Nannini, Margherita Ferioli, Martina Morganti, Alessio G. Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza De Iaco, Pierandrea Perrone, Anna Myriam Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Uterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the oncological safety and reproductive outcomes remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to report and summarize all the published evidence about the fertility-sparing approach in these rare and heterogenous tumors, and to help physicians in making clinical decisions. ABSTRACT: Uterine sarcomas are rare cancers, sometimes diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Hysterectomy is the standard treatment in early stages. The option of lesion removal to save fertility is described in the literature, but it is still considered experimental. The objective of this systematic review is to report on the available evidence on the reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in women with uterine sarcomas. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between 1 January 2011 and 21 June 2021 for publications in English about women with uterine sarcoma treated with a fertility-sparing intervention. Thirty-seven studies were included for a total of 210 patients: 63 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 35 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the cervix, 19 adenosarcomas, 7 leiomyosarcomas and 2 uterine tumors resembling an ovarian sex cord. Conservative treatment ensured pregnancy in 32% of cases. In terms of oncological outcomes, relapse was related to histology and the worst prognosis was reported for leiomyosarcoma, followed by low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, which relapsed in 71% and 54% of cases, respectively. The highest death rate was associated with leiomyosarcoma (57.1%). This study demonstrated that fertility-sparing treatments may be employed in selected cases of early stage uterine sarcoma. MDPI 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8616470/ /pubmed/34830960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225808 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Dondi, Giulia
Porcu, Eleonora
De Palma, Alessandra
Damiano, Giuseppe
De Crescenzo, Eugenia
Cipriani, Linda
Dirodi, Maria
Ravegnini, Gloria
De Leo, Antonio
Nannini, Margherita
Ferioli, Martina
Morganti, Alessio G.
Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanza
De Iaco, Pierandrea
Perrone, Anna Myriam
Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
title Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
title_full Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
title_short Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review
title_sort uterine preservation treatments in sarcomas: oncological problems and reproductive results: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225808
work_keys_str_mv AT dondigiulia uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT porcueleonora uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT depalmaalessandra uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT damianogiuseppe uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT decrescenzoeugenia uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT ciprianilinda uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT dirodimaria uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT ravegninigloria uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT deleoantonio uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT nanninimargherita uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT feriolimartina uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT morgantialessiog uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT pantaleomariaabbondanza uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT deiacopierandrea uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview
AT perroneannamyriam uterinepreservationtreatmentsinsarcomasoncologicalproblemsandreproductiveresultsasystematicreview