Cargando…
Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
PURPOSE: Identification of pregnant women with bonding difficulties is important to provide early intervention. However, few studies have examined the utility of self-report questionnaires that assess mother–infant bonding as screening tools for bonding difficulties. This longitudinal study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S336819 |
_version_ | 1784604407964368896 |
---|---|
author | Hashijiri, Koyo Watanabe, Yuichiro Fukui, Naoki Motegi, Takaharu Ogawa, Maki Egawa, Jun Enomoto, Takayuki Someya, Toshiyuki |
author_facet | Hashijiri, Koyo Watanabe, Yuichiro Fukui, Naoki Motegi, Takaharu Ogawa, Maki Egawa, Jun Enomoto, Takayuki Someya, Toshiyuki |
author_sort | Hashijiri, Koyo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Identification of pregnant women with bonding difficulties is important to provide early intervention. However, few studies have examined the utility of self-report questionnaires that assess mother–infant bonding as screening tools for bonding difficulties. This longitudinal study aimed to identify pregnant women with bonding difficulties using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) and to estimate its optimal cutoff points in the peripartum period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1301 pregnant women completed the MIBS-J and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three time points: first trimester (T1; approximately 12–15 weeks gestation), third trimester (T2; approximately 30–34 weeks gestation), and postpartum (T3; approximately 4 weeks postpartum). A two-step cluster analysis was conducted to classify pregnant women based on their MIBS-J subscale scores at the three time points. Based on the cluster analysis results, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate the optimal cutoff scores for the MIBS-J total score at each time point. RESULTS: The two-step cluster analysis produced two clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 824) and Cluster 2 (n = 477). Both the MIBS-J and HADS scores were significantly higher in Cluster 2 than in Cluster 1 at all time points. The MIBS-J tentative cutoff points were 3/4, 3/4, and 2/3 at T1, T2, and T3, respectively. CONCLUSION: We identified two distinct groups across the perinatal period: pregnant women with bonding difficulties and pregnant women with normal bonding. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the MIBS-J as a screening tool to identify bonding difficulties during pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8616728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86167282021-11-29 Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points Hashijiri, Koyo Watanabe, Yuichiro Fukui, Naoki Motegi, Takaharu Ogawa, Maki Egawa, Jun Enomoto, Takayuki Someya, Toshiyuki Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: Identification of pregnant women with bonding difficulties is important to provide early intervention. However, few studies have examined the utility of self-report questionnaires that assess mother–infant bonding as screening tools for bonding difficulties. This longitudinal study aimed to identify pregnant women with bonding difficulties using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) and to estimate its optimal cutoff points in the peripartum period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1301 pregnant women completed the MIBS-J and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three time points: first trimester (T1; approximately 12–15 weeks gestation), third trimester (T2; approximately 30–34 weeks gestation), and postpartum (T3; approximately 4 weeks postpartum). A two-step cluster analysis was conducted to classify pregnant women based on their MIBS-J subscale scores at the three time points. Based on the cluster analysis results, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate the optimal cutoff scores for the MIBS-J total score at each time point. RESULTS: The two-step cluster analysis produced two clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 824) and Cluster 2 (n = 477). Both the MIBS-J and HADS scores were significantly higher in Cluster 2 than in Cluster 1 at all time points. The MIBS-J tentative cutoff points were 3/4, 3/4, and 2/3 at T1, T2, and T3, respectively. CONCLUSION: We identified two distinct groups across the perinatal period: pregnant women with bonding difficulties and pregnant women with normal bonding. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the MIBS-J as a screening tool to identify bonding difficulties during pregnancy. Dove 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8616728/ /pubmed/34848961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S336819 Text en © 2021 Hashijiri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hashijiri, Koyo Watanabe, Yuichiro Fukui, Naoki Motegi, Takaharu Ogawa, Maki Egawa, Jun Enomoto, Takayuki Someya, Toshiyuki Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points |
title | Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points |
title_full | Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points |
title_fullStr | Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points |
title_short | Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points |
title_sort | identification of bonding difficulties in the peripartum period using the mother-to-infant bonding scale-japanese version and its tentative cutoff points |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S336819 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashijirikoyo identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT watanabeyuichiro identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT fukuinaoki identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT motegitakaharu identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT ogawamaki identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT egawajun identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT enomototakayuki identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT someyatoshiyuki identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints |