Cargando…

Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) requires reliable diagnostic tests, not only to identify high-grade PCa, also to minimize the overdetection of low-grade PCa, and reduction of “unnecessary” prostate MRIs and biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the Sel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendriks, Rianne J., van der Leest, Marloes M. G., Israël, Bas, Hannink, Gerjon, YantiSetiasti, Anglita, Cornel, Erik B., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A., Klaver, O. Sjoerd, Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel, Van Criekinge, Wim, de Jong, Hans, Mulders, Peter F. A., Crawford, E. David, Veltman, Jeroen, Schalken, Jack A., Barentsz, Jelle O., van Oort, Inge M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00367-8
_version_ 1784604413720002560
author Hendriks, Rianne J.
van der Leest, Marloes M. G.
Israël, Bas
Hannink, Gerjon
YantiSetiasti, Anglita
Cornel, Erik B.
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
Klaver, O. Sjoerd
Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
Van Criekinge, Wim
de Jong, Hans
Mulders, Peter F. A.
Crawford, E. David
Veltman, Jeroen
Schalken, Jack A.
Barentsz, Jelle O.
van Oort, Inge M.
author_facet Hendriks, Rianne J.
van der Leest, Marloes M. G.
Israël, Bas
Hannink, Gerjon
YantiSetiasti, Anglita
Cornel, Erik B.
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
Klaver, O. Sjoerd
Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
Van Criekinge, Wim
de Jong, Hans
Mulders, Peter F. A.
Crawford, E. David
Veltman, Jeroen
Schalken, Jack A.
Barentsz, Jelle O.
van Oort, Inge M.
author_sort Hendriks, Rianne J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk stratification in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) requires reliable diagnostic tests, not only to identify high-grade PCa, also to minimize the overdetection of low-grade PCa, and reduction of “unnecessary” prostate MRIs and biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the SelectMDx test to detect high-grade PCa in biopsy-naïve men. Subsequently, to assess combinations of SelectMDx test and multi-parametric (mp) MRI and its potential impact on patient selection for prostate biopsy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter diagnostic study included 599 biopsy-naïve patients with prostate-specific antigen level ≥3 ng/ml. All patients underwent a SelectMDx test and mpMRI before systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB). Patients with a suspicious mpMRI also had an in-bore MR-guided biopsy (MRGB). Histopathologic outcome of TRUSGB and MRGB was used as reference standard. High-grade PCa was defined as ISUP Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2. The primary outcome was the detection rates of low- and high-grade PCa and number of biopsies avoided in four strategies, i.e., (1) SelectMDx test-only, (2) mpMRI-only, (3) SelectMDx test followed by mpMRI when SelectMDx test was positive (conditional strategy), and (4) SelectMDx test and mpMRI in all (joint strategy). A positive SelectMDx test outcome was a risk score of ≥−2.8. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess clinical utility. RESULTS: Prevalence of high-grade PCa was 31% (183/599). Thirty-eight percent (227/599) of patients had negative SelectMDx test in whom biopsy could be avoided. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 35% (48/138) with missing 10% (18/183) high-grade PCa. Yet, mpMRI-only could avoid 49% of biopsies, not detecting 4.9% (9/183) of high-grade PCa. The conditional strategy reduces the number of mpMRIs by 38% (227/599), avoiding biopsy in 60% (357/599) and missing 13% (24/183) high-grade PCa. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 58% (80/138). DCA showed the highest net benefit for the mpMRI-only strategy, followed by the conditional strategy at-risk thresholds >10%. CONCLUSIONS: SelectMDx test as a risk stratification tool for biopsy-naïve men avoids unnecessary biopsies in 38%, minimizes low-grade PCa detection, and misses only 10% high-grade PCa. Yet, using mpMRI in all patients had the highest net benefit, avoiding biopsy in 49% and missing 4.9% of high-risk PCa. However, if mpMRI availability is limited or expensive, using mpMRI-only in SelectMDx test positive patients is a good alternative strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8616754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86167542021-12-10 Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men Hendriks, Rianne J. van der Leest, Marloes M. G. Israël, Bas Hannink, Gerjon YantiSetiasti, Anglita Cornel, Erik B. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. Klaver, O. Sjoerd Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel Van Criekinge, Wim de Jong, Hans Mulders, Peter F. A. Crawford, E. David Veltman, Jeroen Schalken, Jack A. Barentsz, Jelle O. van Oort, Inge M. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: Risk stratification in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) requires reliable diagnostic tests, not only to identify high-grade PCa, also to minimize the overdetection of low-grade PCa, and reduction of “unnecessary” prostate MRIs and biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the SelectMDx test to detect high-grade PCa in biopsy-naïve men. Subsequently, to assess combinations of SelectMDx test and multi-parametric (mp) MRI and its potential impact on patient selection for prostate biopsy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter diagnostic study included 599 biopsy-naïve patients with prostate-specific antigen level ≥3 ng/ml. All patients underwent a SelectMDx test and mpMRI before systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB). Patients with a suspicious mpMRI also had an in-bore MR-guided biopsy (MRGB). Histopathologic outcome of TRUSGB and MRGB was used as reference standard. High-grade PCa was defined as ISUP Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2. The primary outcome was the detection rates of low- and high-grade PCa and number of biopsies avoided in four strategies, i.e., (1) SelectMDx test-only, (2) mpMRI-only, (3) SelectMDx test followed by mpMRI when SelectMDx test was positive (conditional strategy), and (4) SelectMDx test and mpMRI in all (joint strategy). A positive SelectMDx test outcome was a risk score of ≥−2.8. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess clinical utility. RESULTS: Prevalence of high-grade PCa was 31% (183/599). Thirty-eight percent (227/599) of patients had negative SelectMDx test in whom biopsy could be avoided. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 35% (48/138) with missing 10% (18/183) high-grade PCa. Yet, mpMRI-only could avoid 49% of biopsies, not detecting 4.9% (9/183) of high-grade PCa. The conditional strategy reduces the number of mpMRIs by 38% (227/599), avoiding biopsy in 60% (357/599) and missing 13% (24/183) high-grade PCa. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 58% (80/138). DCA showed the highest net benefit for the mpMRI-only strategy, followed by the conditional strategy at-risk thresholds >10%. CONCLUSIONS: SelectMDx test as a risk stratification tool for biopsy-naïve men avoids unnecessary biopsies in 38%, minimizes low-grade PCa detection, and misses only 10% high-grade PCa. Yet, using mpMRI in all patients had the highest net benefit, avoiding biopsy in 49% and missing 4.9% of high-risk PCa. However, if mpMRI availability is limited or expensive, using mpMRI-only in SelectMDx test positive patients is a good alternative strategy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8616754/ /pubmed/33941866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00367-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hendriks, Rianne J.
van der Leest, Marloes M. G.
Israël, Bas
Hannink, Gerjon
YantiSetiasti, Anglita
Cornel, Erik B.
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
Klaver, O. Sjoerd
Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
Van Criekinge, Wim
de Jong, Hans
Mulders, Peter F. A.
Crawford, E. David
Veltman, Jeroen
Schalken, Jack A.
Barentsz, Jelle O.
van Oort, Inge M.
Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
title Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
title_full Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
title_fullStr Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
title_full_unstemmed Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
title_short Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
title_sort clinical use of the selectmdx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpmri in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00367-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hendriksriannej clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT vanderleestmarloesmg clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT israelbas clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT hanninkgerjon clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT yantisetiastianglita clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT cornelerikb clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT hulsbergenvandekaachristinaa clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT klaverosjoerd clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT sedelaarjpmichiel clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT vancriekingewim clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT dejonghans clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT mulderspeterfa clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT crawfordedavid clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT veltmanjeroen clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT schalkenjacka clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT barentszjelleo clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen
AT vanoortingem clinicaluseoftheselectmdxurinarybiomarkertestwithorwithoutmpmriinprostatecancerdiagnosisaprospectivemulticenterstudyinbiopsynaivemen