Cargando…
Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis?
PURPOSE: To establish machine learning(ML) models for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), texture analysis (TA), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative analysis and clinical param...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02507-w |
_version_ | 1784604421215223808 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Tao Xiao, JianMing Li, Lin Pu, BingJie Niu, XiangKe Zeng, XiaoHui Wang, ZongYong Gao, ChaoBang Li, Ci Chen, Lin Yang, Jin |
author_facet | Peng, Tao Xiao, JianMing Li, Lin Pu, BingJie Niu, XiangKe Zeng, XiaoHui Wang, ZongYong Gao, ChaoBang Li, Ci Chen, Lin Yang, Jin |
author_sort | Peng, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To establish machine learning(ML) models for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), texture analysis (TA), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative analysis and clinical parameters and to evaluate the stability of these models in internal and temporal validation. METHODS: The dataset of 194 men was split into training (n = 135) and internal validation (n = 59) cohorts, and a temporal dataset (n = 58) was used for evaluation. The lesions with Gleason score ≥ 7 were defined as csPC. Logistic regression (LR), stepwise regression (SR), classical decision tree (cDT), conditional inference tree (CIT), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models were established by combining mpMRI-TA, DCE-MRI and clinical parameters and validated by internal and temporal validation using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Delong’s method. RESULTS: Eight variables were determined as important predictors for csPC, with the first three related to texture features derived from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. RF, LR and SR models yielded larger and more stable area under the ROC curve values (AUCs) than other models. In the temporal validation, the sensitivity was lower than that of the internal validation (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and AUC (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Each machine learning model in this study has good classification ability for csPC. Compared with internal validation, the sensitivity of each machine learning model in temporal validation was reduced, but the specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV and AUCs remained stable at a good level. The RF, LR and SR models have better classification performance in the imaging-based diagnosis of csPC, and ADC texture-related parameters are of the highest importance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02507-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8616865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86168652021-12-01 Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? Peng, Tao Xiao, JianMing Li, Lin Pu, BingJie Niu, XiangKe Zeng, XiaoHui Wang, ZongYong Gao, ChaoBang Li, Ci Chen, Lin Yang, Jin Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To establish machine learning(ML) models for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), texture analysis (TA), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative analysis and clinical parameters and to evaluate the stability of these models in internal and temporal validation. METHODS: The dataset of 194 men was split into training (n = 135) and internal validation (n = 59) cohorts, and a temporal dataset (n = 58) was used for evaluation. The lesions with Gleason score ≥ 7 were defined as csPC. Logistic regression (LR), stepwise regression (SR), classical decision tree (cDT), conditional inference tree (CIT), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models were established by combining mpMRI-TA, DCE-MRI and clinical parameters and validated by internal and temporal validation using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Delong’s method. RESULTS: Eight variables were determined as important predictors for csPC, with the first three related to texture features derived from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. RF, LR and SR models yielded larger and more stable area under the ROC curve values (AUCs) than other models. In the temporal validation, the sensitivity was lower than that of the internal validation (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and AUC (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Each machine learning model in this study has good classification ability for csPC. Compared with internal validation, the sensitivity of each machine learning model in temporal validation was reduced, but the specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV and AUCs remained stable at a good level. The RF, LR and SR models have better classification performance in the imaging-based diagnosis of csPC, and ADC texture-related parameters are of the highest importance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02507-w. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8616865/ /pubmed/34677748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02507-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Peng, Tao Xiao, JianMing Li, Lin Pu, BingJie Niu, XiangKe Zeng, XiaoHui Wang, ZongYong Gao, ChaoBang Li, Ci Chen, Lin Yang, Jin Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
title | Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
title_full | Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
title_fullStr | Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
title_short | Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
title_sort | can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter mri and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02507-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengtao canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT xiaojianming canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT lilin canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT pubingjie canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT niuxiangke canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT zengxiaohui canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT wangzongyong canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT gaochaobang canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT lici canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT chenlin canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis AT yangjin canmachinelearningbasedanalysisofmultiparametermriandclinicalparametersimprovetheperformanceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdiagnosis |