Cargando…
Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging devices for acquiring anthropometric measurements are proliferating in health-care facilities, although applicability in young children has not been evaluated; small body size and movement may limit device accuracy. The current study aim was to crit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00938-x |
_version_ | 1784604460019875840 |
---|---|
author | Kennedy, Samantha Smith, Brooke Sobhiyeh, Sima Dechenaud, Marcelline E. Wong, Michael Kelly, Nisa Shepherd, John Heymsfield, Steven B. |
author_facet | Kennedy, Samantha Smith, Brooke Sobhiyeh, Sima Dechenaud, Marcelline E. Wong, Michael Kelly, Nisa Shepherd, John Heymsfield, Steven B. |
author_sort | Kennedy, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging devices for acquiring anthropometric measurements are proliferating in health-care facilities, although applicability in young children has not been evaluated; small body size and movement may limit device accuracy. The current study aim was to critically test three commercial 3DO devices in young children. METHODS: The number of successful scans and circumference measurements at six anatomic sites were quantified with the 3DO devices in 64 children, ages 5-8 years. Of the scans available for processing, 3DO and flexible tape-measure measurements made by a trained anthropometrist were compared. RESULTS: 60 of 181 scans (33.1%) could not be processed for technical reasons. Of processed scans, mean 3DO-tape circumference differences tended to be small (~1-9%) and varied across systems; correlations and bias estimates also varied in strength across anatomic sites and systems (e.g., regression R(2)s, 0.54-0.97, all p<0.01). Overall findings differed across devices; best results were for a multi-camera stationary system and less so for two rotating single- or dual-camera systems. CONCLUSIONS: Available 3DO devices for quantifying anthropometric dimensions in adults vary in applicability in young children according to instrument design. These findings suggest the need for 3DO devices designed specifically for small and/or young children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8617044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86170442022-02-09 Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry Kennedy, Samantha Smith, Brooke Sobhiyeh, Sima Dechenaud, Marcelline E. Wong, Michael Kelly, Nisa Shepherd, John Heymsfield, Steven B. Eur J Clin Nutr Article OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging devices for acquiring anthropometric measurements are proliferating in health-care facilities, although applicability in young children has not been evaluated; small body size and movement may limit device accuracy. The current study aim was to critically test three commercial 3DO devices in young children. METHODS: The number of successful scans and circumference measurements at six anatomic sites were quantified with the 3DO devices in 64 children, ages 5-8 years. Of the scans available for processing, 3DO and flexible tape-measure measurements made by a trained anthropometrist were compared. RESULTS: 60 of 181 scans (33.1%) could not be processed for technical reasons. Of processed scans, mean 3DO-tape circumference differences tended to be small (~1-9%) and varied across systems; correlations and bias estimates also varied in strength across anatomic sites and systems (e.g., regression R(2)s, 0.54-0.97, all p<0.01). Overall findings differed across devices; best results were for a multi-camera stationary system and less so for two rotating single- or dual-camera systems. CONCLUSIONS: Available 3DO devices for quantifying anthropometric dimensions in adults vary in applicability in young children according to instrument design. These findings suggest the need for 3DO devices designed specifically for small and/or young children. 2022-02 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8617044/ /pubmed/34040201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00938-x Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Kennedy, Samantha Smith, Brooke Sobhiyeh, Sima Dechenaud, Marcelline E. Wong, Michael Kelly, Nisa Shepherd, John Heymsfield, Steven B. Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry |
title | Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry |
title_full | Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry |
title_fullStr | Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry |
title_short | Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry |
title_sort | digital anthropometric evaluation of young children: comparison to results acquired with conventional anthropometry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00938-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennedysamantha digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT smithbrooke digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT sobhiyehsima digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT dechenaudmarcellinee digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT wongmichael digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT kellynisa digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT shepherdjohn digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry AT heymsfieldstevenb digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry |