Cargando…

Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging devices for acquiring anthropometric measurements are proliferating in health-care facilities, although applicability in young children has not been evaluated; small body size and movement may limit device accuracy. The current study aim was to crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Samantha, Smith, Brooke, Sobhiyeh, Sima, Dechenaud, Marcelline E., Wong, Michael, Kelly, Nisa, Shepherd, John, Heymsfield, Steven B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00938-x
_version_ 1784604460019875840
author Kennedy, Samantha
Smith, Brooke
Sobhiyeh, Sima
Dechenaud, Marcelline E.
Wong, Michael
Kelly, Nisa
Shepherd, John
Heymsfield, Steven B.
author_facet Kennedy, Samantha
Smith, Brooke
Sobhiyeh, Sima
Dechenaud, Marcelline E.
Wong, Michael
Kelly, Nisa
Shepherd, John
Heymsfield, Steven B.
author_sort Kennedy, Samantha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging devices for acquiring anthropometric measurements are proliferating in health-care facilities, although applicability in young children has not been evaluated; small body size and movement may limit device accuracy. The current study aim was to critically test three commercial 3DO devices in young children. METHODS: The number of successful scans and circumference measurements at six anatomic sites were quantified with the 3DO devices in 64 children, ages 5-8 years. Of the scans available for processing, 3DO and flexible tape-measure measurements made by a trained anthropometrist were compared. RESULTS: 60 of 181 scans (33.1%) could not be processed for technical reasons. Of processed scans, mean 3DO-tape circumference differences tended to be small (~1-9%) and varied across systems; correlations and bias estimates also varied in strength across anatomic sites and systems (e.g., regression R(2)s, 0.54-0.97, all p<0.01). Overall findings differed across devices; best results were for a multi-camera stationary system and less so for two rotating single- or dual-camera systems. CONCLUSIONS: Available 3DO devices for quantifying anthropometric dimensions in adults vary in applicability in young children according to instrument design. These findings suggest the need for 3DO devices designed specifically for small and/or young children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8617044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86170442022-02-09 Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry Kennedy, Samantha Smith, Brooke Sobhiyeh, Sima Dechenaud, Marcelline E. Wong, Michael Kelly, Nisa Shepherd, John Heymsfield, Steven B. Eur J Clin Nutr Article OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging devices for acquiring anthropometric measurements are proliferating in health-care facilities, although applicability in young children has not been evaluated; small body size and movement may limit device accuracy. The current study aim was to critically test three commercial 3DO devices in young children. METHODS: The number of successful scans and circumference measurements at six anatomic sites were quantified with the 3DO devices in 64 children, ages 5-8 years. Of the scans available for processing, 3DO and flexible tape-measure measurements made by a trained anthropometrist were compared. RESULTS: 60 of 181 scans (33.1%) could not be processed for technical reasons. Of processed scans, mean 3DO-tape circumference differences tended to be small (~1-9%) and varied across systems; correlations and bias estimates also varied in strength across anatomic sites and systems (e.g., regression R(2)s, 0.54-0.97, all p<0.01). Overall findings differed across devices; best results were for a multi-camera stationary system and less so for two rotating single- or dual-camera systems. CONCLUSIONS: Available 3DO devices for quantifying anthropometric dimensions in adults vary in applicability in young children according to instrument design. These findings suggest the need for 3DO devices designed specifically for small and/or young children. 2022-02 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8617044/ /pubmed/34040201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00938-x Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Kennedy, Samantha
Smith, Brooke
Sobhiyeh, Sima
Dechenaud, Marcelline E.
Wong, Michael
Kelly, Nisa
Shepherd, John
Heymsfield, Steven B.
Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
title Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
title_full Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
title_fullStr Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
title_full_unstemmed Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
title_short Digital Anthropometric Evaluation of Young Children: Comparison to Results Acquired with Conventional Anthropometry
title_sort digital anthropometric evaluation of young children: comparison to results acquired with conventional anthropometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00938-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedysamantha digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT smithbrooke digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT sobhiyehsima digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT dechenaudmarcellinee digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT wongmichael digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT kellynisa digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT shepherdjohn digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry
AT heymsfieldstevenb digitalanthropometricevaluationofyoungchildrencomparisontoresultsacquiredwithconventionalanthropometry