Cargando…
Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study
BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) despite conflicting evidence on its effectiveness. With high levels of user experience, this study aimed to assess consensus amongst experts on its clinical use. METHODS: A three-round interna...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00608-5 |
_version_ | 1784604468218691584 |
---|---|
author | Evans, Jonathan P. Maffulli, Nicola Smith, Chris Watts, Adam Valderas, Jose Goodwin, Vicki |
author_facet | Evans, Jonathan P. Maffulli, Nicola Smith, Chris Watts, Adam Valderas, Jose Goodwin, Vicki |
author_sort | Evans, Jonathan P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) despite conflicting evidence on its effectiveness. With high levels of user experience, this study aimed to assess consensus amongst experts on its clinical use. METHODS: A three-round international Delphi study was conducted. Participants were invited through national society mailing lists and contact lists derived from a systematic search of the literature on PRP. In round one, a primary working group developed 40 statements on PRP preparation and clinical application. In rounds two and three, an international group of researchers on PRP and clinical users of the device scored their levels of agreement with the statements on a five-point scale. Consensus was defined as an interquartile range of ≤ 1. RESULTS: Consensus of agreement was only reached for 17/40 (42.5%) statements. For statements on PRP formulation, consensus of agreement was reached in 2/6 statements (33%). Only limited consensus on the contraindications, delivery strategy and delivery technique was achieved. CONCLUSION: Experts reached very limited consensus on the use of PRP in LET. High levels of user experience have not resulted in a convergence of opinion on the technical components of PRP formulation and delivery, substantiating the need for further studies and improved trial reporting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-021-00608-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8617097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86170972021-12-10 Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study Evans, Jonathan P. Maffulli, Nicola Smith, Chris Watts, Adam Valderas, Jose Goodwin, Vicki J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) despite conflicting evidence on its effectiveness. With high levels of user experience, this study aimed to assess consensus amongst experts on its clinical use. METHODS: A three-round international Delphi study was conducted. Participants were invited through national society mailing lists and contact lists derived from a systematic search of the literature on PRP. In round one, a primary working group developed 40 statements on PRP preparation and clinical application. In rounds two and three, an international group of researchers on PRP and clinical users of the device scored their levels of agreement with the statements on a five-point scale. Consensus was defined as an interquartile range of ≤ 1. RESULTS: Consensus of agreement was only reached for 17/40 (42.5%) statements. For statements on PRP formulation, consensus of agreement was reached in 2/6 statements (33%). Only limited consensus on the contraindications, delivery strategy and delivery technique was achieved. CONCLUSION: Experts reached very limited consensus on the use of PRP in LET. High levels of user experience have not resulted in a convergence of opinion on the technical components of PRP formulation and delivery, substantiating the need for further studies and improved trial reporting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-021-00608-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-25 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8617097/ /pubmed/34825302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00608-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Evans, Jonathan P. Maffulli, Nicola Smith, Chris Watts, Adam Valderas, Jose Goodwin, Vicki Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study |
title | Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study |
title_full | Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study |
title_short | Even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international Delphi study |
title_sort | even experts cannot agree on the optimal use of platelet-rich plasma in lateral elbow tendinopathy: an international delphi study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00608-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evansjonathanp evenexpertscannotagreeontheoptimaluseofplateletrichplasmainlateralelbowtendinopathyaninternationaldelphistudy AT maffullinicola evenexpertscannotagreeontheoptimaluseofplateletrichplasmainlateralelbowtendinopathyaninternationaldelphistudy AT smithchris evenexpertscannotagreeontheoptimaluseofplateletrichplasmainlateralelbowtendinopathyaninternationaldelphistudy AT wattsadam evenexpertscannotagreeontheoptimaluseofplateletrichplasmainlateralelbowtendinopathyaninternationaldelphistudy AT valderasjose evenexpertscannotagreeontheoptimaluseofplateletrichplasmainlateralelbowtendinopathyaninternationaldelphistudy AT goodwinvicki evenexpertscannotagreeontheoptimaluseofplateletrichplasmainlateralelbowtendinopathyaninternationaldelphistudy |