Cargando…

Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study

INTRODUCTION: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomaschek, Rebecca, Touhami, Dima, Essig, Stefan, Gemperli, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873
_version_ 1784604504560238592
author Tomaschek, Rebecca
Touhami, Dima
Essig, Stefan
Gemperli, Armin
author_facet Tomaschek, Rebecca
Touhami, Dima
Essig, Stefan
Gemperli, Armin
author_sort Tomaschek, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primary care model based on this collaboration. METHODS: The intervention is medical education on SCI related topics offered by specialists to GPs practicing in rural areas. Outcomes are assessed and analyzed in physicians and patients. Group allocation of persons with SCI follows intention-to-treat principle with intervention group being those in close proximity to a participating GP. RESULTS: It is expected that ten GPs and sixteen specialists will take part in the study's intervention. An average difference in “Doctor's opinion on collaboration questionnaire” score (mean 44; SD ± 12) from baseline after two years post-intervention in the group of participating GPs is hypothesized at P-value level <0.05; meanwhile, the control group remains at an average score of 56. Of persons with SCI (n = 395), 230 are expected to take part in the study at baseline. An average modified “Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale” change in score from baseline to 24 months post intervention is expected to fall from 12.0 to 9.0 in the intervention group and to stay at 12.0 in the control group. CONCLUSION: The study aims to improve patients' outcomes and providers’ experience with delivery of care for persons with SCI, as compared to current best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04071938. Registered August 28, 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04071938.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8617342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86173422021-12-02 Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study Tomaschek, Rebecca Touhami, Dima Essig, Stefan Gemperli, Armin Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article INTRODUCTION: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primary care model based on this collaboration. METHODS: The intervention is medical education on SCI related topics offered by specialists to GPs practicing in rural areas. Outcomes are assessed and analyzed in physicians and patients. Group allocation of persons with SCI follows intention-to-treat principle with intervention group being those in close proximity to a participating GP. RESULTS: It is expected that ten GPs and sixteen specialists will take part in the study's intervention. An average difference in “Doctor's opinion on collaboration questionnaire” score (mean 44; SD ± 12) from baseline after two years post-intervention in the group of participating GPs is hypothesized at P-value level <0.05; meanwhile, the control group remains at an average score of 56. Of persons with SCI (n = 395), 230 are expected to take part in the study at baseline. An average modified “Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale” change in score from baseline to 24 months post intervention is expected to fall from 12.0 to 9.0 in the intervention group and to stay at 12.0 in the control group. CONCLUSION: The study aims to improve patients' outcomes and providers’ experience with delivery of care for persons with SCI, as compared to current best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04071938. Registered August 28, 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04071938. Elsevier 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8617342/ /pubmed/34869940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tomaschek, Rebecca
Touhami, Dima
Essig, Stefan
Gemperli, Armin
Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_full Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_fullStr Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_full_unstemmed Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_short Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_sort shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaschekrebecca sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT touhamidima sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT essigstefan sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT gemperliarmin sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy