Cargando…

Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia

PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the mechanisms underlying the oxygenation response to proning and recruitment maneuvers in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, at variable times since admission (from 1 to 3 weeks), underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Sandra, Palumbo, Maria Michela, Sverzellati, Nicola, Busana, Mattia, Malchiodi, Laura, Bresciani, Paolo, Ceccarelli, Patrizia, Sani, Emanuele, Romitti, Federica, Bonifazi, Matteo, Gattarello, Simone, Steinberg, Irene, Palermo, Paola, Lazzari, Stefano, Collino, Francesca, Cressoni, Massimo, Herrmann, Peter, Saager, Leif, Meissner, Konrad, Quintel, Michael, Camporota, Luigi, Marini, John J., Gattinoni, Luciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4
_version_ 1784604509358522368
author Rossi, Sandra
Palumbo, Maria Michela
Sverzellati, Nicola
Busana, Mattia
Malchiodi, Laura
Bresciani, Paolo
Ceccarelli, Patrizia
Sani, Emanuele
Romitti, Federica
Bonifazi, Matteo
Gattarello, Simone
Steinberg, Irene
Palermo, Paola
Lazzari, Stefano
Collino, Francesca
Cressoni, Massimo
Herrmann, Peter
Saager, Leif
Meissner, Konrad
Quintel, Michael
Camporota, Luigi
Marini, John J.
Gattinoni, Luciano
author_facet Rossi, Sandra
Palumbo, Maria Michela
Sverzellati, Nicola
Busana, Mattia
Malchiodi, Laura
Bresciani, Paolo
Ceccarelli, Patrizia
Sani, Emanuele
Romitti, Federica
Bonifazi, Matteo
Gattarello, Simone
Steinberg, Irene
Palermo, Paola
Lazzari, Stefano
Collino, Francesca
Cressoni, Massimo
Herrmann, Peter
Saager, Leif
Meissner, Konrad
Quintel, Michael
Camporota, Luigi
Marini, John J.
Gattinoni, Luciano
author_sort Rossi, Sandra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the mechanisms underlying the oxygenation response to proning and recruitment maneuvers in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, at variable times since admission (from 1 to 3 weeks), underwent computed tomography (CT) lung scans, gas-exchange and lung-mechanics measurement in supine and prone positions at 5 cmH(2)O and during recruiting maneuver (supine, 35 cmH(2)O). Within the non-aerated tissue, we differentiated the atelectatic and consolidated tissue (recruitable and non-recruitable at 35 cmH(2)O of airway pressure). Positive/negative response to proning/recruitment was defined as increase/decrease of PaO(2)/FiO(2). Apparent perfusion ratio was computed as venous admixture/non aerated tissue fraction. RESULTS: The average values of venous admixture and PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio were similar in supine-5 and prone-5. However, the PaO(2)/FiO(2) changes (increasing in 65% of the patients and decreasing in 35%, from supine to prone) correlated with the balance between resolution of dorsal atelectasis and formation of ventral atelectasis (p = 0.002). Dorsal consolidated tissue determined this balance, being inversely related with dorsal recruitment (p = 0.012). From supine-5 to supine-35, the apparent perfusion ratio increased from 1.38 ± 0.71 to 2.15 ± 1.15 (p = 0.004) while PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio increased in 52% and decreased in 48% of patients. Non-responders had consolidated tissue fraction of 0.27 ± 0.1 vs. 0.18 ± 0.1 in the responding cohort (p = 0.04). Consolidated tissue, PaCO(2) and respiratory system elastance were higher in patients assessed late (all p < 0.05), suggesting, all together, “fibrotic-like” changes of the lung over time. CONCLUSION: The amount of consolidated tissue was higher in patients assessed during the third week and determined the oxygenation responses following pronation and recruitment maneuvers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8617364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86173642021-11-26 Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia Rossi, Sandra Palumbo, Maria Michela Sverzellati, Nicola Busana, Mattia Malchiodi, Laura Bresciani, Paolo Ceccarelli, Patrizia Sani, Emanuele Romitti, Federica Bonifazi, Matteo Gattarello, Simone Steinberg, Irene Palermo, Paola Lazzari, Stefano Collino, Francesca Cressoni, Massimo Herrmann, Peter Saager, Leif Meissner, Konrad Quintel, Michael Camporota, Luigi Marini, John J. Gattinoni, Luciano Intensive Care Med Original PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the mechanisms underlying the oxygenation response to proning and recruitment maneuvers in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, at variable times since admission (from 1 to 3 weeks), underwent computed tomography (CT) lung scans, gas-exchange and lung-mechanics measurement in supine and prone positions at 5 cmH(2)O and during recruiting maneuver (supine, 35 cmH(2)O). Within the non-aerated tissue, we differentiated the atelectatic and consolidated tissue (recruitable and non-recruitable at 35 cmH(2)O of airway pressure). Positive/negative response to proning/recruitment was defined as increase/decrease of PaO(2)/FiO(2). Apparent perfusion ratio was computed as venous admixture/non aerated tissue fraction. RESULTS: The average values of venous admixture and PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio were similar in supine-5 and prone-5. However, the PaO(2)/FiO(2) changes (increasing in 65% of the patients and decreasing in 35%, from supine to prone) correlated with the balance between resolution of dorsal atelectasis and formation of ventral atelectasis (p = 0.002). Dorsal consolidated tissue determined this balance, being inversely related with dorsal recruitment (p = 0.012). From supine-5 to supine-35, the apparent perfusion ratio increased from 1.38 ± 0.71 to 2.15 ± 1.15 (p = 0.004) while PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio increased in 52% and decreased in 48% of patients. Non-responders had consolidated tissue fraction of 0.27 ± 0.1 vs. 0.18 ± 0.1 in the responding cohort (p = 0.04). Consolidated tissue, PaCO(2) and respiratory system elastance were higher in patients assessed late (all p < 0.05), suggesting, all together, “fibrotic-like” changes of the lung over time. CONCLUSION: The amount of consolidated tissue was higher in patients assessed during the third week and determined the oxygenation responses following pronation and recruitment maneuvers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8617364/ /pubmed/34825929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original
Rossi, Sandra
Palumbo, Maria Michela
Sverzellati, Nicola
Busana, Mattia
Malchiodi, Laura
Bresciani, Paolo
Ceccarelli, Patrizia
Sani, Emanuele
Romitti, Federica
Bonifazi, Matteo
Gattarello, Simone
Steinberg, Irene
Palermo, Paola
Lazzari, Stefano
Collino, Francesca
Cressoni, Massimo
Herrmann, Peter
Saager, Leif
Meissner, Konrad
Quintel, Michael
Camporota, Luigi
Marini, John J.
Gattinoni, Luciano
Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia
title Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_full Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_fullStr Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_short Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_sort mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in covid-19 pneumonia
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rossisandra mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT palumbomariamichela mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT sverzellatinicola mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT busanamattia mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT malchiodilaura mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT brescianipaolo mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT ceccarellipatrizia mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT saniemanuele mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT romittifederica mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT bonifazimatteo mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT gattarellosimone mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT steinbergirene mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT palermopaola mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT lazzaristefano mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT collinofrancesca mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT cressonimassimo mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT herrmannpeter mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT saagerleif mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT meissnerkonrad mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT quintelmichael mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT camporotaluigi mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT marinijohnj mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia
AT gattinoniluciano mechanismsofoxygenationresponsestoproningandrecruitmentincovid19pneumonia