Cargando…

Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test

The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Wansuk, Heo, Seoyoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111579
_version_ 1784604548696899584
author Choi, Wansuk
Heo, Seoyoon
author_facet Choi, Wansuk
Heo, Seoyoon
author_sort Choi, Wansuk
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning process. Videos were processed on YouTube and 103,116 frames converted from video clips were analyzed. In the modeling implementation, the process of importing the required modules, performing the necessary data preprocessing for training, defining the model, compiling, model creation, and model fit were applied in sequence. Comparative models were Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, NASNetMobile, DenseNet121, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, and fine tuning was performed. They were trained in a high-performance computing environment, and validation and loss were measured as comparative indicators of performance. Relatively low validation loss and high validation accuracy were obtained from Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet201 models, which is evaluated as an excellent model compared with other models. On the other hand, from VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, relatively high validation loss and low validation accuracy were obtained compared with other models. There was a narrow range of difference between the validation accuracy and the validation loss of the Xception, InceptionV3, and DensNet201 models. This study suggests that training applied with transfer learning can classify ULTT videos, and that there is a difference in performance between models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8617619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86176192021-11-27 Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test Choi, Wansuk Heo, Seoyoon Healthcare (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning process. Videos were processed on YouTube and 103,116 frames converted from video clips were analyzed. In the modeling implementation, the process of importing the required modules, performing the necessary data preprocessing for training, defining the model, compiling, model creation, and model fit were applied in sequence. Comparative models were Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, NASNetMobile, DenseNet121, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, and fine tuning was performed. They were trained in a high-performance computing environment, and validation and loss were measured as comparative indicators of performance. Relatively low validation loss and high validation accuracy were obtained from Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet201 models, which is evaluated as an excellent model compared with other models. On the other hand, from VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, relatively high validation loss and low validation accuracy were obtained compared with other models. There was a narrow range of difference between the validation accuracy and the validation loss of the Xception, InceptionV3, and DensNet201 models. This study suggests that training applied with transfer learning can classify ULTT videos, and that there is a difference in performance between models. MDPI 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8617619/ /pubmed/34828625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111579 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Wansuk
Heo, Seoyoon
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_full Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_fullStr Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_short Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_sort deep learning approaches to automated video classification of upper limb tension test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111579
work_keys_str_mv AT choiwansuk deeplearningapproachestoautomatedvideoclassificationofupperlimbtensiontest
AT heoseoyoon deeplearningapproachestoautomatedvideoclassificationofupperlimbtensiontest