Cargando…

Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology has been widely applied worldwide, but it is often contaminated by confounders other than cortical stimulus-evoked activities. Although advanced sham coils that elaborately mimic active stimulation have recently been developed, their performanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takano, Mayuko, Havlicek, Jiri, Phillips, Dan, Nakajima, Shinichiro, Mimura, Masaru, Noda, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34834410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111058
_version_ 1784604641189691392
author Takano, Mayuko
Havlicek, Jiri
Phillips, Dan
Nakajima, Shinichiro
Mimura, Masaru
Noda, Yoshihiro
author_facet Takano, Mayuko
Havlicek, Jiri
Phillips, Dan
Nakajima, Shinichiro
Mimura, Masaru
Noda, Yoshihiro
author_sort Takano, Mayuko
collection PubMed
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology has been widely applied worldwide, but it is often contaminated by confounders other than cortical stimulus-evoked activities. Although advanced sham coils that elaborately mimic active stimulation have recently been developed, their performance is not examined in detail. Developing such sham coils is crucial to improve the accuracy of TMS neurophysiology. Herein, we examined the specifications of the sham coil by comparison with the active coil. The magnetic flux and click sound pressure changes were measured when the stimulus intensity was varied from 10% to 100% maximum stimulator output (MSO), and the changes in coil surface temperature over time with continuous stimulation at 50% MSO for each coil. The magnetic flux change at the center of the coil showed a peak of 12.51 (kT/s) for the active coil, whereas it was 0.41 (kT/s) for the sham coil. Although both coils showed a linear change in magnetic flux as the stimulus intensity increased, due to the difference in coil winding structure, the sham coil took less than half the time to overheat and had 5 dB louder coil click sounds than the active coil. The sham coil showed a sufficiently small flux change at the center of the coil, but the flux change from the periphery of the coil was comparable to that of the active coil. Future use of high-quality sham coil will extend our understanding of the TMS neurophysiology of the cortex at the stimulation site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8617996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86179962021-11-27 Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications Takano, Mayuko Havlicek, Jiri Phillips, Dan Nakajima, Shinichiro Mimura, Masaru Noda, Yoshihiro J Pers Med Article Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology has been widely applied worldwide, but it is often contaminated by confounders other than cortical stimulus-evoked activities. Although advanced sham coils that elaborately mimic active stimulation have recently been developed, their performance is not examined in detail. Developing such sham coils is crucial to improve the accuracy of TMS neurophysiology. Herein, we examined the specifications of the sham coil by comparison with the active coil. The magnetic flux and click sound pressure changes were measured when the stimulus intensity was varied from 10% to 100% maximum stimulator output (MSO), and the changes in coil surface temperature over time with continuous stimulation at 50% MSO for each coil. The magnetic flux change at the center of the coil showed a peak of 12.51 (kT/s) for the active coil, whereas it was 0.41 (kT/s) for the sham coil. Although both coils showed a linear change in magnetic flux as the stimulus intensity increased, due to the difference in coil winding structure, the sham coil took less than half the time to overheat and had 5 dB louder coil click sounds than the active coil. The sham coil showed a sufficiently small flux change at the center of the coil, but the flux change from the periphery of the coil was comparable to that of the active coil. Future use of high-quality sham coil will extend our understanding of the TMS neurophysiology of the cortex at the stimulation site. MDPI 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8617996/ /pubmed/34834410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111058 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Takano, Mayuko
Havlicek, Jiri
Phillips, Dan
Nakajima, Shinichiro
Mimura, Masaru
Noda, Yoshihiro
Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_full Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_fullStr Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_full_unstemmed Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_short Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_sort development of an advanced sham coil for transcranial magnetic stimulation and examination of its specifications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34834410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111058
work_keys_str_mv AT takanomayuko developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT havlicekjiri developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT phillipsdan developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT nakajimashinichiro developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT mimuramasaru developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT nodayoshihiro developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications