Cargando…

Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10

Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuda, Yuhei, Kumakura, Isami, Okui, Tatsuo, Karino, Masaaki, Aoi, Noriaki, Okuma, Satoe, Takeda, Mayu, Hayashida, Kenji, Sakamoto, Tatsunori, Kanno, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112061
_version_ 1784604650839736320
author Matsuda, Yuhei
Kumakura, Isami
Okui, Tatsuo
Karino, Masaaki
Aoi, Noriaki
Okuma, Satoe
Takeda, Mayu
Hayashida, Kenji
Sakamoto, Tatsunori
Kanno, Takahiro
author_facet Matsuda, Yuhei
Kumakura, Isami
Okui, Tatsuo
Karino, Masaaki
Aoi, Noriaki
Okuma, Satoe
Takeda, Mayu
Hayashida, Kenji
Sakamoto, Tatsunori
Kanno, Takahiro
author_sort Matsuda, Yuhei
collection PubMed
description Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 eligible oral cancer patients (median age, 72 years; 42 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the internal consistency of the scale, was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, which indicates reproducibility, was 0.85 (95% confidential interval: 0.40–0.96, p < 0.05). Concurrent validity testing showed a statistically significant correlation between POD-10 and Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (r = 0.89, p < 0.05). To test discriminant validity, statistically significant differences were found between early-stage cancer (stage I and II) and advanced-stage cancer (stage III and IV) (p < 0.05). Twenty-four points were calculated as the cutoff value for POD-10 using receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate the cutoff value. The POD-10 was shown to be a clinically reliable and valid scale that can be used to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer and is expected to be used as a simple diagnostic tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8618035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86180352021-11-27 Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10 Matsuda, Yuhei Kumakura, Isami Okui, Tatsuo Karino, Masaaki Aoi, Noriaki Okuma, Satoe Takeda, Mayu Hayashida, Kenji Sakamoto, Tatsunori Kanno, Takahiro Diagnostics (Basel) Article Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 eligible oral cancer patients (median age, 72 years; 42 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the internal consistency of the scale, was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, which indicates reproducibility, was 0.85 (95% confidential interval: 0.40–0.96, p < 0.05). Concurrent validity testing showed a statistically significant correlation between POD-10 and Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (r = 0.89, p < 0.05). To test discriminant validity, statistically significant differences were found between early-stage cancer (stage I and II) and advanced-stage cancer (stage III and IV) (p < 0.05). Twenty-four points were calculated as the cutoff value for POD-10 using receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate the cutoff value. The POD-10 was shown to be a clinically reliable and valid scale that can be used to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer and is expected to be used as a simple diagnostic tool. MDPI 2021-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8618035/ /pubmed/34829408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112061 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matsuda, Yuhei
Kumakura, Isami
Okui, Tatsuo
Karino, Masaaki
Aoi, Noriaki
Okuma, Satoe
Takeda, Mayu
Hayashida, Kenji
Sakamoto, Tatsunori
Kanno, Takahiro
Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_full Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_fullStr Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_short Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_sort development of a subjective symptom rating scale for postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer: reliability and validity of the postoperative oral dysfunction scale-10
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112061
work_keys_str_mv AT matsudayuhei developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT kumakuraisami developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT okuitatsuo developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT karinomasaaki developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT aoinoriaki developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT okumasatoe developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT takedamayu developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT hayashidakenji developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT sakamototatsunori developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT kannotakahiro developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10